Our Recent Paper on Evaluation of CAM5.3 using COSP and satellite observations

18 views
Skip to first unread message

Zhibo Zhang

unread,
Jan 12, 2018, 10:15:32 AM1/12/18
to COSP users group
Hi COSP community,

      I'd like to bring to your attention our recent paper "An Evaluation of Marine Boundary Layer Cloud Property Simulations in Community Atmosphere Model Using Satellite Observations: Conventional Sub-grid Parameterization vs. CLUBB" which just came out of the J. Climate. http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0277.1
     In the paper, we used satellite observations from NASA's A-Train constellation to evaluate the Marine Boundary Layer Cloud Properties simulated in two versions of CAM5.3, one with the conventional sub-grid parameterization scheme and the other with the CLUBB (Cloud Layer Unified By Binormals). The abstract of the paper is below. 

    We hope this study, in which COSP played an important role, will help your research. Let me know if you have any questions. 

Best,
-Zhibo Zhang

------------------------------------------
Dr. Zhibo Zhang
Associate Professor
Physics Dept./JCET-UMBC
------------------------------------------

Abstract

This paper presents a satellite observation based evaluation of the marine boundary layer (MBL) cloud properties from two Community Atmospheric Model Version 5 (CAM5) simulations, one with the standard parameterization schemes (CAM5-Base), and the other with the Cloud Layer Unified By Binormals scheme (CAM5-CLUBB). When comparing the direct model outputs, we find that CAM5-CLUBB produces more MBL clouds, a smoother transition from stratocumulus to cumulus and a tighter correlation between in-cloud water and cloud fraction than CAM5-Base. In the model-to-observation comparison using the COSP satellite simulators, we find that both simulations capture the main features and spatial patterns of the observed cloud fraction from MODIS and shortwave cloud radiative forcing (SWCF) from CERES. However, CAM5-CLUBB suffers more than CAM5-Base from a problem that can be best summarized as “undetectable” clouds, i.e., a significant fraction of simulated MBL clouds are thinner than MODIS detection threshold. This issue leads to a smaller COSP-MODIS cloud fraction and a weaker SWCF in CAM5-CLUBB than the observations and also CAM5-Base in the tropical descending regions. Finally, we compare modeled radar reflectivity with CloudSat observations, and find that both simulations, especially CAM5-CLUBB, suffer from excessive drizzle problem. Further analysis reveals that the sub-grid precipitation enhancement factors in CAM5-CLUBB are unrealistically large, which makes MBL clouds precipitate too excessively, and in turn results in too many “undetectable” thin clouds.

Klein, Stephen A.

unread,
Jan 12, 2018, 11:34:22 AM1/12/18
to cosp...@googlegroups.com

Dear Zhibo,

 

Thanks for sending this note. I had the pleasure of editing your paper which I do recommend to anyone interested in the observational assessment of marine low-cloud simulations by climate models.

 

Steve

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "COSP users group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cosp-user+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages