Issue 20 in cortex-vfx: ProceduralHolderSop should be able to accept inputs the same as the OpHolderSop

[corte...@googlecode.com]

Status: Accepted
Owner: danbethell
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-IECoreHoudini

New issue 20 by danbethell: ProceduralHolderSop should be able to accept
inputs the same as the OpHolderSop
http://code.google.com/p/cortex-vfx/issues/detail?id=20

The procedural holder should be able to accept object/primitive inputs just
as the OpHolder does.

This ties in with moving a lot of the code which is common to both OpHolder
and ProceduralHolder up into the abstract ParameterisedHolder class.

[corte...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Assigned

Comment #1 on issue 20 by danbethell: ProceduralHolderSop should be able to

accept inputs the same as the OpHolderSop
http://code.google.com/p/cortex-vfx/issues/detail?id=20

(No comment was entered for this change.)

[corte...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Owner: andrewk.imageengine

Comment #2 on issue 20 by andrewk....@gmail.com: ProceduralHolderSop should

[corte...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Fixed

Comment #3 on issue 20 by andrewk....@gmail.com: ProceduralHolderSop should

be able to accept inputs the same as the OpHolderSop
http://code.google.com/p/cortex-vfx/issues/detail?id=20

This issue was closed by revision r4039.