NYT on Ely Lilly documents? Definite Malpractice
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Mort Zuckerman
Sep 7, 2008, 6:56:38 AM9/7/08
to corrupticourts
To: zerh...@od.nih.gov, Spin...@yahoogroups.com,
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, james.p...@yale.edu
Subject: NYT on Ely Lilly documents? Definite Malpractice
Date: Sep 7, 2008 6:55 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
Nope. The unwritten fact here is that the American Psychiatric
Association's guidelines say that you have to demonstrate a medical
rule out for organic or delirium signs (in every DSM), and that the
delirium has to be treated medically first.
First, note that I have this delirium:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
And that it goes away with long term intravenous ceftriaxone:
http://www.actionlyme.org/FALLON_DANGEROUS_TERRORIST.htm
IN the upcoming trial:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
The Malpractice Treatment of Lyme Delirium or Tabes Dorsalis:
http://www.actionlyme.org/anders4.jpg
"THE DELIRIUM SHOULD BE TREATED FIRST"
"Medications for psychiatric disorders can be both the cause of
delirium and
exacerbate or contribute to delirium from other causes."- The
American Psychiatric
Association
"The following is the testimony of KAREN FORSCHNER of the LYME DISEASE
FOUNDATION
(Lyme.org) who witnessed the brain damage the RESPONDENT suffered upon
the malpractice
treatment of Lyme Delirium by JAMES PHILLIPS, "MD" who happens to be
incompetent
due to his sex-obsession. PHILLIPS' only topic is sex, much like DCF,
as evidenced
by DCF's former commissioner, KRISTINE RAGAGLIA, and in this case,
apparently,
ANNETTE ANDERSON.
"You were rocking and pacing during the meeting."
This is the brain damage known as akathisia or a drug-induced
Parkinson's-like
disorder caused by brain damaging psychotropics. It is caused by
actual brain cell
death at the base of the brain from the multiple toxicities of Lyme
encephalopathy
in combination with the brain damage well-known to be caused by
psychotropics.
In order that JAMES PHILLIPS not be sued for malpractice, he perjured
himself, as
did DMHAS' KENNETH MARCUS. RESPONDENT DICKSON, never had a trial in
either
her DCF "case" or for her false criminal charges. That would be
because
it would be revealed that JAMES PHILLIPS is a malpractitioner,
perjurer, sex-obsessed,
and most of all, that Lyme is a real brain disease that should not be
malpractice-treated
as a psychiatric disorder. This in fact is the gist if the Lyme RICO
complaint:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
=============================
What this all means is that according to the American Psychiatric
Associations guidelines on Delirium, all Lyme victims are supposed
to be treated with ceftriaxone, or else the psychiatrist has
committed malpractice.
Get it?
This is a true and published "guidelines" fact.
Jemzek lost his license over it, and they "tried to shut
down" dozens of others over violations to Lyme treatment
"guidelines."
=======================
Ely Lilly went around saying Zyprexa is for everything, but no
one from the American Psychiatric Association said anything
about it being malpractice to treat a real brain disease with
anything other than real medicine- which is the real psychiatric
whores are routinely used by the Bigs to abuse sick people.
That is, PSYCHIATRISTS ARE SO RELIABLY STUPID, Ely Lilly knew
they could bet on pushing Zyprexa for old people and hyperactive
kids and anyone else. Psychiatrists have no idea what guidelines
are for. They said so under oath during the bag job of myself:
James Phillips (Yale moron) and Kenneth Marcus (former Yale moron
and incompetent head of the psych klink:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARCUS_DANGEROUS_INCOMPETENCE.htm )
This Lilly Zyprexa case should put the final nail in the coffin
for the APA, especially after all the recent $candal$ re bipolar in
children and other typical MD whore-payoffs by the BigPharma johns.
I'm kinda surprised people aren't racing me to publish a
scientifically
truthful book about psychiatry and psychotropics. Then again, the
cowardly authors don't dare offend interviewees because of the
possibility of interviewing the offended ones in subsequent books.
You know: Don't tell the truth in a book or a newspaper and cut off
your own money-supply, now, people.
(It's pathetic. If cowardice was a disease it would be EBOLA, since
it has consumed, very nearly completely, this entire society.)
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/business/06lilly.html?pagewanted=print
The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By
September 6, 2008
Judge to Unseal Documents on the Eli Lilly Drug Zyprexa
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
A federal judge in Brooklyn decided on Friday to unseal confidential
materials about
Eli Lilly’s top-selling antipsychotic drug Zyprexa, citing “the health
of hundreds
of thousands of people” and “fundamental questions” about the way
drugs are approved
for new uses.
The decision by Judge Jack B. Weinstein of Federal District Court came
as part of
a ruling that gave class-action status to a case brought by insurance
companies,
pension funds and unions that want Lilly to repay them billions of
dollars they
spent on the drug. They contend that Lilly hid the side effects of the
drug and
marketed it for unapproved uses.
The confidential documents were produced by Lilly in response to a
related lawsuit
filed by patients who said that Zyprexa had caused excessive weight
gain and diabetes.
The papers were placed under a protective court order soon after the
suit was filed
in 2004.
“Lilly’s legitimate interest in confidentiality does not outweigh the
public interest
in disclosure at this stage,” Judge Weinstein wrote.
A spokeswoman for Lilly, Marni Lemons, said the company would not
appeal the decision
to make the documents public but that it would appeal the judge’s
certification
of a class action.
The issue of confidential information arose in 2006, when some of the
Zyprexa papers
were provided to a reporter for The New York Times, Alex Berenson. He
wrote front-page
articles based on evidence they contained that Lilly executives had
kept information
from doctors about Zyprexa’s links to obesity and high blood sugar.
Eli Lilly denied having withheld such information and said that the
documents Mr.
Berenson had seen were “cherry-picked” to give a one-sided view.
The publication of sealed information led Judge Weinstein to issue a
sharply worded
ruling last year, stating that Mr. Berenson had engaged in a
conspiracy with a doctor
and a lawyer and that they had used others “as their agents in crime.”
The judge said the sealed documents belonged to Lilly and ordered the
doctor, David
S. Egilman, and the lawyer, James B. Gottstein, to return them. Dr.
Egilman had
been serving as an expert consultant for the plaintiffs at the time,
and Mr. Gottstein
was working on Zyprexa litigation in Alaska.
Since then, insurance companies, unions, medical researchers and other
publications
have filed formal requests for copies of the documents. Many of the
papers were
entered into open court proceedings in Alaska, and copies of some have
been posted
on the Internet.
In his ruling on Friday, Judge Weinstein repeated that the information
had been
“obtained illegally” by The Times but also cited “this country’s
general policy
of accessibility of court records.”
Dr. Egilman said on Friday that he felt vindicated.
“The public can now decide for itself what these documents stand for,”
he said.
Mr. Gottstein said he still disputed Judge Weinstein’s rulings that he
had obtained
the documents illegally.
“I think I did get them properly,” he said, adding that the new order
unsealed only
a small number of the Zyprexa documents that Lilly has provided to the
court. “There
are a lot of other documents that are hidden.”
Home
* World
* U.S.
* N.Y. / Region
* Business
* Technology
* Science
* Health
* Sports
* Opinion
* Arts
* Style
* Travel
* Jobs
* Real Estate
* Automobiles
* Back to Top
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
* Privacy Policy
* Search
* Corrections
* RSS
* First Look
* Help
* Contact Us
* Work for Us
* Site Map
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, james.p...@yale.edu
Subject: NYT on Ely Lilly documents? Definite Malpractice
Date: Sep 7, 2008 6:55 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
Nope. The unwritten fact here is that the American Psychiatric
Association's guidelines say that you have to demonstrate a medical
rule out for organic or delirium signs (in every DSM), and that the
delirium has to be treated medically first.
First, note that I have this delirium:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
And that it goes away with long term intravenous ceftriaxone:
http://www.actionlyme.org/FALLON_DANGEROUS_TERRORIST.htm
IN the upcoming trial:
http://www.actionlyme.org/andersonpenisbiter.htm
The Malpractice Treatment of Lyme Delirium or Tabes Dorsalis:
http://www.actionlyme.org/anders4.jpg
"THE DELIRIUM SHOULD BE TREATED FIRST"
"Medications for psychiatric disorders can be both the cause of
delirium and
exacerbate or contribute to delirium from other causes."- The
American Psychiatric
Association
"The following is the testimony of KAREN FORSCHNER of the LYME DISEASE
FOUNDATION
(Lyme.org) who witnessed the brain damage the RESPONDENT suffered upon
the malpractice
treatment of Lyme Delirium by JAMES PHILLIPS, "MD" who happens to be
incompetent
due to his sex-obsession. PHILLIPS' only topic is sex, much like DCF,
as evidenced
by DCF's former commissioner, KRISTINE RAGAGLIA, and in this case,
apparently,
ANNETTE ANDERSON.
"You were rocking and pacing during the meeting."
This is the brain damage known as akathisia or a drug-induced
Parkinson's-like
disorder caused by brain damaging psychotropics. It is caused by
actual brain cell
death at the base of the brain from the multiple toxicities of Lyme
encephalopathy
in combination with the brain damage well-known to be caused by
psychotropics.
In order that JAMES PHILLIPS not be sued for malpractice, he perjured
himself, as
did DMHAS' KENNETH MARCUS. RESPONDENT DICKSON, never had a trial in
either
her DCF "case" or for her false criminal charges. That would be
because
it would be revealed that JAMES PHILLIPS is a malpractitioner,
perjurer, sex-obsessed,
and most of all, that Lyme is a real brain disease that should not be
malpractice-treated
as a psychiatric disorder. This in fact is the gist if the Lyme RICO
complaint:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
=============================
What this all means is that according to the American Psychiatric
Associations guidelines on Delirium, all Lyme victims are supposed
to be treated with ceftriaxone, or else the psychiatrist has
committed malpractice.
Get it?
This is a true and published "guidelines" fact.
Jemzek lost his license over it, and they "tried to shut
down" dozens of others over violations to Lyme treatment
"guidelines."
=======================
Ely Lilly went around saying Zyprexa is for everything, but no
one from the American Psychiatric Association said anything
about it being malpractice to treat a real brain disease with
anything other than real medicine- which is the real psychiatric
whores are routinely used by the Bigs to abuse sick people.
That is, PSYCHIATRISTS ARE SO RELIABLY STUPID, Ely Lilly knew
they could bet on pushing Zyprexa for old people and hyperactive
kids and anyone else. Psychiatrists have no idea what guidelines
are for. They said so under oath during the bag job of myself:
James Phillips (Yale moron) and Kenneth Marcus (former Yale moron
and incompetent head of the psych klink:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MARCUS_DANGEROUS_INCOMPETENCE.htm )
This Lilly Zyprexa case should put the final nail in the coffin
for the APA, especially after all the recent $candal$ re bipolar in
children and other typical MD whore-payoffs by the BigPharma johns.
I'm kinda surprised people aren't racing me to publish a
scientifically
truthful book about psychiatry and psychotropics. Then again, the
cowardly authors don't dare offend interviewees because of the
possibility of interviewing the offended ones in subsequent books.
You know: Don't tell the truth in a book or a newspaper and cut off
your own money-supply, now, people.
(It's pathetic. If cowardice was a disease it would be EBOLA, since
it has consumed, very nearly completely, this entire society.)
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/business/06lilly.html?pagewanted=print
The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By
September 6, 2008
Judge to Unseal Documents on the Eli Lilly Drug Zyprexa
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
A federal judge in Brooklyn decided on Friday to unseal confidential
materials about
Eli Lilly’s top-selling antipsychotic drug Zyprexa, citing “the health
of hundreds
of thousands of people” and “fundamental questions” about the way
drugs are approved
for new uses.
The decision by Judge Jack B. Weinstein of Federal District Court came
as part of
a ruling that gave class-action status to a case brought by insurance
companies,
pension funds and unions that want Lilly to repay them billions of
dollars they
spent on the drug. They contend that Lilly hid the side effects of the
drug and
marketed it for unapproved uses.
The confidential documents were produced by Lilly in response to a
related lawsuit
filed by patients who said that Zyprexa had caused excessive weight
gain and diabetes.
The papers were placed under a protective court order soon after the
suit was filed
in 2004.
“Lilly’s legitimate interest in confidentiality does not outweigh the
public interest
in disclosure at this stage,” Judge Weinstein wrote.
A spokeswoman for Lilly, Marni Lemons, said the company would not
appeal the decision
to make the documents public but that it would appeal the judge’s
certification
of a class action.
The issue of confidential information arose in 2006, when some of the
Zyprexa papers
were provided to a reporter for The New York Times, Alex Berenson. He
wrote front-page
articles based on evidence they contained that Lilly executives had
kept information
from doctors about Zyprexa’s links to obesity and high blood sugar.
Eli Lilly denied having withheld such information and said that the
documents Mr.
Berenson had seen were “cherry-picked” to give a one-sided view.
The publication of sealed information led Judge Weinstein to issue a
sharply worded
ruling last year, stating that Mr. Berenson had engaged in a
conspiracy with a doctor
and a lawyer and that they had used others “as their agents in crime.”
The judge said the sealed documents belonged to Lilly and ordered the
doctor, David
S. Egilman, and the lawyer, James B. Gottstein, to return them. Dr.
Egilman had
been serving as an expert consultant for the plaintiffs at the time,
and Mr. Gottstein
was working on Zyprexa litigation in Alaska.
Since then, insurance companies, unions, medical researchers and other
publications
have filed formal requests for copies of the documents. Many of the
papers were
entered into open court proceedings in Alaska, and copies of some have
been posted
on the Internet.
In his ruling on Friday, Judge Weinstein repeated that the information
had been
“obtained illegally” by The Times but also cited “this country’s
general policy
of accessibility of court records.”
Dr. Egilman said on Friday that he felt vindicated.
“The public can now decide for itself what these documents stand for,”
he said.
Mr. Gottstein said he still disputed Judge Weinstein’s rulings that he
had obtained
the documents illegally.
“I think I did get them properly,” he said, adding that the new order
unsealed only
a small number of the Zyprexa documents that Lilly has provided to the
court. “There
are a lot of other documents that are hidden.”
Home
* World
* U.S.
* N.Y. / Region
* Business
* Technology
* Science
* Health
* Sports
* Opinion
* Arts
* Style
* Travel
* Jobs
* Real Estate
* Automobiles
* Back to Top
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
* Privacy Policy
* Search
* Corrections
* RSS
* First Look
* Help
* Contact Us
* Work for Us
* Site Map
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages