Ready for AmRev II (Bring it on)

[Mort Zuckerman]

To: Emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, zerh...@od.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net, tr...@hotmail.com,
illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com, tinaj...@yahoo.com,
jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us,
freet...@charter.net, scott....@po.state.ct.us,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov, Robert....@yale.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org

Subject: Ready for AmRev II

Date: Dec 5, 2008 5:45 AM

Yeah. When the Washington Times ran a story about the
US Military being deployed on the <choke, gag> Homeland
[COPIED AND LINKED BELOW THE PCR STORY], I was like,
Bring it on.

We need a civil war.

It's necessary because we have no U. S. department of
justice and all the cops are insane.

I'm ready. A lot of people I know are ready.

What's not predictable is what all the druggies and
alcoholics will do (about half the adult population);
we need them on the side of the people. However, they
tend to be wussier than the rest of us- the exact opposite
of what they would have everyone think.

Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
========================================

http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts259.html

Washington Arrogance Has Fomented a Muslim Revolution

by Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts

Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a
link to this
article and return to it at www.savethis.com Email a link to this
articleEmail
a link to this article Printer-friendly version of this
articlePrinter-friendly
version of this article View a list of the most popular articles on
our siteView
a list of the most popular articles on our site
DIGG THIS

"In a government of law, the existence of the government will be
imperiled
if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the
potent, the omnipresent
teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by example.
Crime is contagious.
If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the
law; it invites
every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy."

~ Justice Louis Brandeis

Is Pakistan responsible for the Mumbai attack in India? No.

Is India’s repression of its Muslim minority responsible? No.

Is the United States government responsible? Yes.

The attack on Mumbai required radicalized Muslims. Radicalized Muslims
resulted
from the US overthrowing the elected government in Iran and imposed
the Shah; from
the US stationing troops in Saudi Arabia; from the US invading and
attempting to
occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, bombing weddings, funerals, and
children’s soccer games;
from the US violating international and US law by torturing its Muslim
victims;
from the US enlisting Pakistan in its war against the Taliban; from
the US violating
Pakistan’s sovereignty by conducting military operations on Pakistani
territory,
killing Pakistani civilians; from the US government supporting a half
century of
Israeli ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from their lands, towns and
villages; from
the assault of American culture on Muslim values; from the US
purchasing the government
of Egypt to act as its puppet; from US arrogance that America is the
supreme arbiter
of morality.

As Justice Brandeis said, crime is contagious. Government teaches by
example, and
America’s example is lawlessness. America’s brutal crimes against the
Muslim world
have invited every Muslim to become a law unto himself – a
revolutionary. It is
not terror that Washington confronts but revolution.

By illegal, uncivilized and undiplomatic behavior, the US has stirred
Muslim peoples
from their long slumber as serfs of Western colonial powers. Some
Muslims have had
all that they can take, and their fury drives them to rouse a billion
of their fellows
to throw off the yoke of foreign hegemony.

The arrogant incompetence of American governments brought this
conflict to the American
people and inflicted it upon the world. By destabilizing Pakistan, the
US lost a
puppet and created an opportunity for Muslim revolutionaries to
exploit. By enraging
India against Pakistan, the Mumbai attack has created new problems for
Pakistan
that will focus that government’s attention away from combating
Taliban sanctuaries
on Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan. If the US picks up the slack,
it will have
invaded yet another country and become trapped in a larger quagmire.

Having fomented terrorism, the American government now pretends to be
the innocent
victim, just as Israelis, having brought about terrorism by driving
Palestinians
from their homes and villages, pretend to be innocent victims.

Today European members of NATO, an outdated organization formed to
defend Western
Europe against Soviet invasion, are sacrificing the lives of their
soldiers fighting
the American Empire’s war in Afghanistan. If America continues to have
its way,
Europeans will soon be dying in Ukraine, Georgia, and Iran.

The American government, which preaches "freedom and democracy" has in
the 21st century gone to great extremes to stamp out the US
Constitution and the
civil liberties that it guarantees. The US government has repudiated
the Geneva
Conventions and the prohibitions in US statutory law against torture.
The US government
has set aside habeas corpus, the ancient legal principle guaranteed by
the US Constitution
that prohibits governments from holding people in prisons without
presenting charges.
The US government has broken the laws of other nations by kidnapping
foreign citizens
and transporting them to other lands to be tortured.

These massive crimes have been justified in the name of the "war on
terror."
In truth, America’s crimes foment revolution.

It was the US government that created the "war on terror," which has
been
used to murder and dispossess millions of Iraqis and Afghans, to
imprison US citizens
as if they were medieval serfs, and to squander three trillion dollars
for the sole
purpose of enriching Halliburton and the military-security complex.

Investigative journalist John Pilger has shown that the so-called
"moral superiority
of the West" is a hoax designed to shield from view the self-seeking
West’s
crimes against humanity.

Obama promised change from this destructive behavior, but how does
change arise
when the most arrogant woman on earth is appointed Secretary of State
and the rest
of the new government is staffed with tried-and-true Likudniks and
servants of the
military-security complex?

The change over which Obama will preside will have no American
victories. The change
will come from America as a failed state, from the dollar dethroned as
reserve currency,
from America repudiated by its allies and paid puppets, from massive
unemployment
for which there is no solution, from hyperinflation that produces
anarchy.

The day might arrive when Washington is faced with revolution at home
as well as
abroad.

December 5, 2008

Paul Craig Roberts [send him mail] a former Assistant Secretary of the
US Treasury
and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been
reporting shocking
cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new edition of his
book, The Tyranny
of Good Intentions, co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented
account of
how Americans lost the protection of law, has just been released by
Random House.

Copyright © 2008 Creators Syndicate


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/dec/02/domestic-military-response/

When the liberal American Civil Liberties Union and the libertarian
Cato Institute
are singing the same song, it's time to pay attention to the tune. The
two organizations
are rightfully concerned by the expansion of executive authority that
is inherent
in plans to have 20,000 troops inside the United States whose role is
to respond
to any domestic catastrophe. This homeland security role cries out for
oversight
and strict guidelines.

Since 1878, in the wake of the Civil War, the military has been
constrained by the
Posse Comitatus Act from having a domestic law enforcement role under
most circumstances.
With the proliferation of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction,
it does seem
prudent to train military rapid-reaction forces to back up civilian
responders who
likely would be overwhelmed in a domestic chemical, biological or
nuclear incident.
On a much smaller scale, the military has had preparations for a
domestic WMD attacks
since at least 1996, as The Washington Post has reported. The paper
also says the
Pentagon - prodded by the Bush administration, Congress, various
experts and circumstances
- plans, funding permitting, three active-duty combat brigades of
4,700 troops apiece
and 80 smaller National Guard and Reserve units totaling 6,000
personnel. This is
a change in military culture and responsibilities not warmly embraced
by the military,
which is already stretched thin.

Late last month, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates gave officials 25
days to assess
whether active military, Guard and Reserve forces can respond
adequately to domestic
disasters. A congressionally sponsored commission back in January
concluded they
weren't ready and lacked equipment and training, and it is doubtful
the situation
has changed.

But a bigger question is whether domestic emergency deployment is, in
the words
of an ACLU official, "just the first example of a series of expansions
in presidential
and military authority" and an increase in domestic surveillance or,
in the
words of a Cato official, a possible "creeping militarization" of
homeland
security. These are not warnings to be taken lightly - too often the
camel's
nose under the tent leads to the tent never looking or being the same
again.

Obviously, a dirty bomb, for instance, needs immediate response. But
we would urge
Congress to seek an appropriate immediate-authorization mechanism for
use of active
duty or federalized forces in certain categories of domestic
emergency. Perhaps
the unanimous approval of the president, president pro tem of the
Senate, house
speaker and chief justice, with time limits on military activities
before congressional
review, should be considered.

The U.S. military has a long, strong history and culture of civilian
control, and
probably no one anywhere thinks this will ever change. Nor is any
president likely
to go rogue. That really isn't the point. In card games, everyone
trusts each
other but the cards are still cut before the dealer deals them.
[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permission