canadians, feh
Jerry
"Steeve" <ste...@eps.mcgill.ca> wrote in message
news:38318565...@eps.mcgill.ca...
>
> "Jerry Sanderson [C_Tech]" wrote:
> >
> > There are a number of patches available for various things; are you
> > sure you have the appropriate one? What version of Draw do you have as
> > shown in Help/About, and what's the URL of the patch you downloaded?
>
> None of the following is directed at any of the Corel
> Technical support people, all of whom have shown
> remarkable patience considering the idiocy behind
> the design of the product that they support.
>
> <RANT>
>
> I'm rewriting this reply because the language of my
> original was beyond that of acceptable use on Usenet.
>
> I've applied these patches UMPTEEN times. Nearly every
> time I try to apply a patch something goes wrong. Today
> I tried to update one of the machines in the department.
> The patch failed. Some file or other on the hard disk had
> a different version from that expected by the patch even
> though I was applying patch 232-369 to a version of CorelDraw
> 8 level 232. So now I uninstall CorelDraw 8 (which seems
> to be the only solution to this ridiculous problem) and
> immediately install two patches that take twenty minutes
> each to apply. Why the level 2 patch wasn't combined into
> the first patch is beyond me. Microsoft !#@$!@# logic
> is what that seems to be; make the patching process so
> tedious that one is forced to buy into the so-called
> upgrade.
>
> I'm am just so bloody sick of Corel installation programs.
> God help the Corel Linux venture if the same logic is
> used for the linux install programs. For now I'll stick
> with Redhat rpm's.
>
> </RANT>
>
> --
> :wq
When you uninstalled the suite, did you manually delete the entire directory
with all its contents? The uninstaller only removes the files recorded during
installation, so there are usually a few INI and workspace files left
over--and the patch could be looking at one of them and deciding it's the
wrong version.
Jerry
C_Tech Volunteer