The RRTH Act fulfils the historical
void that existed in safeguarding patient rights in India, writes the
author. Representational image. Pic courtesy: ILO Asia Pacific via
Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
The Rajasthan Right to Health Care Act (the RRTH Act) passed by the legislative assembly of the state of Rajasthan on March 21st this year, draws our attention to the quintessential issue of patients’ rights in healthcare. In the doctor-centric health care system in India, patient rights seldom feature in public debate, are rarely considered integral to realising our citizenship, and are not legally defined. Yet, patient rights form a very significant component of citizens’ fundamental right to health care.
The Right to Health Care Act is framed with the objective of ensuring health for all, and also conversely, that healthcare is never denied to any citizen. It proposes to legally define collective and individual rights in health care, constitute state and district authorities, and institute grievance redressal and social accountability mechanisms.
In a calibrated move, the Act also details the rights of doctors and health care providers, while laying down the duties, both of doctors as well as of the government.
Key provisions of the RRTH Act