Re: [ControlTier] Re-run Failed ControlTier Job

23 views
Skip to first unread message

Anthony Shortland

unread,
Nov 20, 2012, 11:28:10 AM11/20/12
to contr...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ron,

Is your job encoded as a CtlCenter job or as a Ctl module workflow?

If it's the former, I think the functionality you're after is the "job step error handler" feature of Rundeck (http://rundeck.org - the CtlCenter replacement).

Anthony.

On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Ron Miller <sirr...@gmail.com> wrote:

I am running four commands in a job (Command 1, Command 2, Command 3, and Command 4).  The first two commands run successfully but the third one fails.  Is there any way to just re-run Command 3 instead of re-running the entire job?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ControlTier" group.
To post to this group, send email to contr...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to controltier...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/controltier?hl=en
http://wiki.controltier.org


Ron Miller

unread,
Nov 26, 2012, 4:01:00 PM11/26/12
to contr...@googlegroups.com
Hi Anthony,

I was unable to find functionality in the rundeck.org site/documentation that allows you to selectively run a failed command in a CtlCenter job.

Thanks,
Ron

Anthony Shortland

unread,
Nov 28, 2012, 2:43:47 PM11/28/12
to contr...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ron,

I'm proposing that you use Rundeck instead of CtlCenter. There hasn't been a ControlTier release since the 3.6.1 maintenance release in 9/2011, meanwhile the community's efforts have been going into Rundeck (the CtlCenter fork) for a couple of years now.

I confirmed that the job step error handler feature I'm thinking of is only available on the current Rundeck development branch ... you can pick up the latest build here: rundeck-development ... the feature is documented in that distribution but not yet published online.

By the way, are you using ControlTier Ant-based Ctl modules? Are you using the Workbench resource model beyond maintaining the Node list?

If the answer is no to these questions your move to Rundeck will be a doddle (as some of us say!)

Anthony.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages