Dear CMS Team,
I hope you're doing well. I'm a student and competitive programmer who has used CMS extensively during various Olympiad-style contests, and I really appreciate the reliability and robustness the system offers.
That said, I’ve often found the user interface to be quite dated and unintuitive by modern standards. I understand that CMS prioritises functionality and correctness, especially in high-stakes settings, but I was curious: is there a specific reason the interface has remained in its current state? Is it a design philosophy, a matter of stability, or simply limited resources for UI development?
I’ve been considering proposing and potentially implementing some improvements to the CMS interface. I would be happy to open a detailed GitHub pull request or proposal if you’d be open to it. But before doing that, I wanted to check:
Are contributions in this area currently welcome?
Do you have any guidelines or expectations for UI/UX changes?
Are there past discussions or blockers I should be aware of?
I completely understand if the team prefers to keep the interface minimal or if changes could introduce risk, but I’d love to understand the reasoning and see if there’s any space to contribute meaningfully.
Thank you for your time, and for maintaining such an important piece of infrastructure for the Olympiad community.
Warm regards,
Avighna Chhatrapati
[GitHub: avighnac]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CMS support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to contestms-supp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/contestms-support/99040F24-545A-46C0-987B-91AAD2A7CDC5%40gmail.com.