Surfacing social media content

42 views
Skip to first unread message

Keith Bolland

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 12:43:51 AM4/18/13
to content...@googlegroups.com
Hi folks,

There's a discussion going on at my work (a medium-sized university) right now about the best way to drive engagement with our social media presence. We've had a request from higher up to display recent tweets and Facebook posts from our corporate accounts onto our homepage, the idea being that this will lure people to like/follow us. 

I'm sceptical about the value of this--I've been trying to inch us towards a COPE model and would rather put our energy into creating the content in our CMS and using OG markup and the like to make it as attractive as possible for social media, rather than creating content inside the silo of a social media platform and syndicating it back to our website. I think this is going to be more effective in getting people to actually interact with us.

However I don't know of any hard data one way or the other. Does anyone know of any case studies I can use to back up (or refute!) my argument? Or has anyone got any data they can share?

Cheers

Keith Bolland

Misty Melissa Weaver

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 6:10:38 PM4/18/13
to content...@googlegroups.com
I don't have hard data but would love some as this is the center of a proposal I'm now writing.

In my case, I turn the conversation back to business goals. The purpose of social media for this company is to drive people to their website. If people are on the home page and we send them away, then we're working against those goals. The staff prefer social media because their CMS is in the way, it's just easier from workflow to quality standards POV to post to Facebook. I have to point out what they're are losing by not investing in the website first - real, engaging shareable stories that people and the press want to share. None of the social channels facilitate any meaningful transactions for them. They want to see dollars, not more likes. I'm presenting this as challenge, tracked by analytics. They already know they can produce content for social channels, can they produce content for the website that brings in more visits, more multiple page visits and lower bounce rates?

Usually I find this conversation is political and sometimes, you have to give in or find a compromise. I think making very clear you have social media is great. Don't hide it, make a prominent graphic appeal. Or add it as "continue the conversation on ...." to the actual body of a post. Call to Action leads to social media, great. 

Is there data that is unique to your context? What do numbers of followers and likes really mean to your leadership? Is this tied to someone's evaluation or departmental funding? Is it an experiment a higher up wants to see done? Are your major competitors doing it - because if their not it's a sign, you can look at all of their numbers and what they're doing. Social channels take lots of time to develop audiences and community. If you're not seeing numbers there, taking it to the home page will only detract from the home page's function (meaning turning people away from sales.) Better to use the channels to find customers and start conversations and relationships. Use them to generate new leads - don't send away the ones you already have.

In my case, I work for non-profits who know social doesn't generate ROI. They use them solely for good will and community building, my challenge is to convince them that web content not social media that generates press, participation and donations. This can be harder to business leaders to understand but there are lots of articles - Forbes, Forrester - on how social doesn't create leads or sales. Kissmetrics, Boagworld sometimes.

Today's Forbes article is another in the series of how social doesn't bring in direct business
http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2013/04/17/why-small-businesses-are-losing-on-social-media/

Sometimes you just need one powerful stat.

Or a back-up plan - like if social goes on the home page you will agree to rigorous analytics review and remove if negative impacts are seen. Figure out how the current home page's analytics are working first :)

Hope this helps, I'm very interested to hear from folks.

Cindy Solomon

unread,
Apr 18, 2013, 6:22:39 PM4/18/13
to content...@googlegroups.com
Keith and Misty,

I've been experimenting with some very cool tools for curating, capturing, branding and maintaining the social media buzz on your site without sending traffic away.  Twylah.com, Scoop.it and Storify.com are out in front of developing lean and marketing content solutions and each has white labelilng and embedding features that they continue to enhance.  I can put you in touch with the CEO's of each if that would be helpful, as they would love your feedback.

Appreciate this valuable discussion.

Best,
Cindy


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Content Strategy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to contentstrate...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to content...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/contentstrategy?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



--
Cindy F. Solomon
510-499-6955
cfso...@gmail.com
www.linkedin.com/in/cfsolomon
Twitter and skype @cindyfsolomon

Join the Startup Product movement for product excellence!

Global Product Management Talk
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/prodmgmttalk
Broadcast discussion with professionals passionate about products, business process, product management, startups, marketing, innovation and excellence.
@prodmgmttalk #prodmgmttalk
Be showcased on the show! http://bit.ly/f4xAIW
------->As a top 10 business podcast on the BlogTalkRadio network, we receive >20,000 listens per week! Imagine your brand engaged with our audience for over 50 minutes on their personal devices! Sponsor us: http://bit.ly/gF0Tt3

---
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or phone and delete this message and its attachments, if any from your system.

Jonathon Colman

unread,
Apr 20, 2013, 6:04:56 PM4/20/13
to content...@googlegroups.com
I think that Misty is spot-on here. Use this request as an opportunity to help your organization move toward making data-driven decisions. Because if you end up simply standing in the way, you'll run the risk of becoming That Guy. And, as we all know, That Guy often has limited influence and growth in the future, mostly because That Guy leads with the word "No."

I like what Misty says about compromise; that's the art of saying "Yes, and...", which can get you things like trust and support that later lead to being influential within your organization. I don't see this as being strictly quid pro quo, however, so long as you're able to hold yourself accountable to using data to guide your decisions and your organization to using data to guide theirs.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages