Web connector problem when using port.

50 views
Skip to first unread message

Stegie

unread,
Nov 3, 2014, 9:16:18 AM11/3/14
to const...@googlegroups.com
I installed constellio and start playing with.  It is working fine, except when I try to give him an url with a port in it. For example :  http://www.mywebsite.com:81/mydirectory/
Constellio don't log any error about it, but it is doing nothing.  If I change the url of the connector for one without port in it, it works as expected and index the site no problem.

Can anyone tell me if it's a limitation ?  Is there any workarround ?

Thanks !

Nicolas Bélisle

unread,
Nov 4, 2014, 12:12:04 PM11/4/14
to const...@googlegroups.com
It should work. Did you add the inclusion also  (with the port number) ?
Regards, 

Nicolas

--
Vous recevez ce message, car vous êtes abonné au groupe Google Groupes "Constellio".
Pour vous désabonner de ce groupe et ne plus recevoir d'e-mails le concernant, envoyez un e-mail à l'adresse constellio+...@googlegroups.com.
Pour envoyer un message à ce groupe, envoyez un e-mail à l'adresse const...@googlegroups.com.
Visitez ce groupe à l'adresse http://groups.google.com/group/constellio.
Pour obtenir davantage d'options, consultez la page https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Stegie

unread,
Nov 7, 2014, 10:28:27 AM11/7/14
to const...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I did !

As for more information... I'm using constellio 2.0M2
My web site is under an url like this : http://myweb.com:81/   -> this is a reverse nat to a machine inside my nat at port 80
My constellio is reachable with something like this : http://myweb.com:82/  -> this is a reverse nat to the same machine inside my nat at port 8080
The web connector  url and the inclusion is set to  http://myweb.com:81/Foo/Bar/

Thanks !

Stegie

unread,
Nov 14, 2014, 9:43:22 AM11/14/14
to const...@googlegroups.com
Any thought on how I can fix this ?

Thanks !

Nicolas Bélisle

unread,
Nov 14, 2014, 11:13:50 AM11/14/14
to const...@googlegroups.com
Are some of your URLs using redirections ?

Can you try without the reverse NAT ?

Regards, 

Nicolas

Stegie

unread,
Nov 17, 2014, 4:44:32 PM11/17/14
to const...@googlegroups.com
Hi Nicolas,

Thanks to put me on the right track...
Effectively, it was working without the reverse nat.   My firewall was blocking me, my DMZ subnet was not able to use the reverse nat loopback, after fixing this, everything start to work as expected !

Best regards !
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages