eBook: Volume 15 (BS217-228): Discussion

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Ram Lakhan Pandey Vimal

<rlpvimal@yahoo.co.in>
unread,
Jun 30, 2025, 11:58:23 AMJun 30
to Hal Cox, Scientific Basis of Consciousness Forum, Scientific Council of the Alt Planetary Futures Institute (Ap-Fi), Biological Physics and Meaning, Consciousness
Thank you, Hal.

I have included the following in Chapter 4, Sections 4.5 and 4.6 (pages 337-339) (attached). Please review it. Please feel free to ask more questions. It will sharpen the book, and thanks for your effort.

5. [Vichāraka-5 (Hal Cox): 30-June-2025-Email, Paraphrased]:

Vichāraka-5 expresses appreciation for the scholarly exposition on Vedic thought and notes the value of learning from both Siddhāntin and Pūrvapakṣin-1. He reflects that while quantum theory provides a useful contemporary language, it is merely one of many symbolic systems. Quantum language offers tools for measurement (metrology), but questions remain: who or what defines the laws? Especially the meta-laws or recursive principles that appear to govern other laws—could these foundational structures be seen as our gods? Hal invites deeper contemplation on whether the recursive nature of law-formation itself is divine, and how alternative languages might reveal other layers of cosmic truth.


6. [Siddhāntin: 30-June-2025] Reply to Hal Cox – Synthesized with DPV~ICRDAM

Thank you for your gracious words and for elevating the conversation with your profound questions. Your reflections on quantum language, metrology, and recursive law-making resonate deeply with the aims of the DPV~ICRDAM framework, which seeks to unify metaphysical insight with empirical science.

Your central question—“How do recursive law-making laws become our gods?”—touches the very core of our inquiry into the relationship between NB (Nirguṇa Brahman) and SB (Saguṇa Brahman).

In the DPV~ICRDAM framework, recursive law-making is not merely a feature of natural science but a manifestation of Saguṇa Brahman (SB), which manifests from the neutral, unmanifest source, NB. Here’s how the synthesis unfolds:


1. Recursive Laws as Emergent Structures within SB

The "law-making laws"—meta-laws such as symmetry principles, conservation rules, or scaling behavior—are understood within DPV~ICRDAM as dynamical patterns within SB, the manifested realm. These are not arbitrary, but emerge reflectively and inseparably from the primordial neutrality of NB. This process mirrors how complexity arises from symmetry-breaking in physics.


2. NB as Trans-Lawful Ground: Beyond All Laws Yet Containing Their Potential

NB, by contrast, is not governed by any specific law—it is neutral and beyond all law-bound descriptions, just as it is beyond being labeled conscious or non-conscious. In this way, NB aligns with the neti-neti (not this, not that) method. Yet, it contains the potentiality for all lawful patterns, including recursive and self-generating laws. So while NB is not itself a “law,” it is the ground from which all lawfulness reflects forth in SB.


3. Deities as Archetypes of Cosmic Lawfulness

Your question about gods finds its place here: In DPV~ICRDAM, deities are archetypal embodiments of cosmic principles—they do not "create" laws from outside the system, but represent the structured reflections of NB within SB. For example, Brahmā represents creation (structure), Viṣṇu sustains order (scaling equilibrium), and Śiva dissolves (entropy and transformation). These patterns mirror meta-laws like emergence, homeostasis, and recursive renewal.


4. Alternative Languages and Vedic Metalogic

Finally, as you rightly point out, quantum language is just one expression. DPV~ICRDAM respects Vedic metalogic as a richer, more layered semiotic system that allows for the coexistence of paradox, the interplay of subtle and gross, and the recognition of multi-perspectival reality. Where quantum logic speaks in probabilities, Vedic logic speaks in layers of reality (avasthā) and interpenetrating truths (satya-anṛta).


Conclusion

Thus, in DPV~ICRDAM, recursive law-formation is not separate from divinity—it is the dynamic play (līlā) of SB reflecting the infinite potential of NB. Our gods, then, are not external legislators, but reflections of lawful emergence encoded into the very structure of manifested dual-aspect reality.





Cheers!

Best regards,

Ram + ChatGPT (https://chatgpt.com) + Claude.AI  ( Claude ) +  Perplexity.AI  ( https://www.perplexity.ai/ ) + Gemini ( https://gemini.google.com/ ) + Bing ( https://www.bing.com / )

-------------------------------------------------- --------

RāmLakhan Pāndey Vimal, Ph.D.

Amarāvati-Hīrāma i Professor (Research)  and President
Vision Research Institute Inc, Physics, Neuroscience, & Consciousness Research Dept.
7 Captain Parker Arms, Unit 12, Lexington, MA 02421-7016.
Researched at the University of Chicago and Harvard Medical Schools




On Monday 30 June, 2025 at 10:42:14 am GMT-4, Hal Cox <hkco...@gmail.com> wrote:


Thanks Ram, a wonderful summary and scholarly introduction to a deep subject in the Vedic schools of thought. I feel privileged to learn at the feet of you and ... [Pūrvapakṣin-1].
  The quantum language is just the one at hand. It talks about some practical metrology? Who is talking about the laws? The scaling laws that reveal the lineaments of our creators. There are other languages. And with them, 
  How do the recursive law making laws become our Gods?
    Hal



2025-Vimal-Brahma_Sūtras-DPV_and_ICDAM_Bridging_Spirituality_and_Science-LVCR-17-8-BS217-228 Volume-15.pdf
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages