Dear Bernardo and all,
I kindly request that you review the following write-up, as your insights and feedback are invaluable to its success:
Revisiting the Priority of Subjectivity and the Reality of Bhagavān in a Scientific Cosmos
Classical idealism posits that mind or consciousness is the primary substance of reality. However, historical idealism often lacked empirical grounding or integration with modern science. In this article, we present Neo-Idealism through the DPV~ICRDAM framework, wherein all reality is understood as a reflective dual-aspect system emerging from Nirguṇa Brahman (NB). Subjectivity (s-aspect) is not an emergent property but a primordial ontological dimension, co-expressed through non-subjective correlates (ns-aspects). This model affirms the absolute primacy of consciousness while accommodating empirical science through its dual-aspect metaphysics. The result is a non-solipsistic, theistic idealism compatible with neurophilosophy, quantum theory, and Gauḍīyan Vedānta.
While materialist science has dominated explanatory paradigms, philosophical idealism is resurging—especially through non-dual, panpsychist, and reflective models (Chalmers, 1995; Kastrup, 2019). Yet traditional idealism often lacked clarity on how to model the physical world. DPV~ICRDAM resolves this by asserting that consciousness is inseparable from its reflection as embodied structure (ns-aspect). This model synthesizes insights from Vedānta, cognitive science, and systems theory.
Neo-Idealism asserts:
Unlike subjective idealism, Neo-Idealism affirms a shared, relational divine personality (Ātmā/Bhagavān), aligning with bhakti-theistic Vedānta.
Model |
Primary Substance |
World Reality |
Scientific Integration |
Berkeleyan Idealism |
Mind of God |
Illusory |
Low |
German Idealism |
Absolute Spirit |
Dialectical |
Moderate |
Neo-Idealism (DPV) |
Reflective DAS |
Real and Structured |
High |
Neo-Idealism offers a modern, scientifically informed upgrade to classical idealism by grounding all phenomena in conscious-reflective structures derived from Nirguṇa Brahman. Within the DPV~ICRDAM framework, reality is dual-aspect and ontologically inseparable from experience. This model bridges metaphysics, consciousness science, and theistic Vedānta into a unified cosmology that honors both empirical and spiritual truth.
Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
Kastrup, B. (2019). The idea of the world: A multi-disciplinary argument for the mental nature of reality. Iff Books.
Northoff, G. (2016). Neurophilosophy of the self: A neural signature of the first-person perspective. MIT Press.
Rosenblum, B., & Kuttner, F. (2011). Quantum enigma: Physics encounters consciousness (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Vimal, R. L. P. (2023). Towards a Holistic Paradigm: Inseparable-Complementary-Reflective Dual-Aspect Monism and Dvi-Pakṣādvaita Vedānta can bridge the Gap between Science and Spirituality (Volume 1: Chapters 1-12). Vision Research Institute: Living Vision and Consciousness Research, 16(4), 1-1091. [Available: <Volume 1: (Vimal, 2023): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377964854> and <(Vimal, 2023): https://www.academia.edu/121285641/>]. https://5mp.academia.edu/RamLakhanPandeyVimal
Vimal, R. L. P. (2024a). Towards a Holistic Paradigm: Inseparable-Complementary-Reflective Dual-Aspect Monism and Dvi-Pakṣādvaita Vedānta can bridge Science and Spirituality (Volume 2: Appendices).Vision Research Institute: Living Vision and Consciousness Research, 16(5), 1-800. Available: <Volume 2: (Vimal, 2024a): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380850619> and (Vimal, 2024a): https://www.academia.edu/119946366>
Vimal, R. L. P. (2024b). Towards a Holistic Paradigm: Inseparable-Complementary-Reflective Dual-Aspect Monism and Dvi-Pakṣādvaita Vedānta can bridge Science and Spirituality (Volume 3: Discussions). Vision Research Institute: Living Vision and Consciousness Research, 16(6), 1-453. Available<Volume 3: (Vimal, 2024b): https://www.academia.edu/122272500/ and (Vimal, 2024b): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382457706 >. Note: All volumes (Vimal, 2023, 2024a, 2024b, 2025a, 2025b) adopt a non-sectarian approach to bridge the two seemingly opposite major sects: spirituality and science. <Volume 3.1: (Vimal, 2024b.Volume 3.1, Sections 1-77): https://www.academia.edu/122272500/ and (Vimal, 2024b.Volume 3.1,Sections 1-77): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382457706 > ]. <Volume 3.2: (Vimal, 2024b.Volume 3.2,Sections 78-89): https://www.academia.edu/122272500/ and (Vimal, 2024b.Volume 3.2): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382457706 > ]. <Volume 3.3: (Vimal, 2024b.Volume 3.3, Sections 90-): https://www.academia.edu/ and (Vimal, 2024b.Volume 3.3): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/> ]
Vimal, R. L. P. (2025a). Towards a Holistic Paradigm: Inseparable-Complementary-Reflective Dual-Aspect Monism and Dvi-Pakṣādvaita Vedānta can bridge Science and Spirituality (Volume 4: Challenges and Resolutions).Vision Research Institute: Living Vision and Consciousness Research, 17(1), 1-560. (Vimal, 2025a). Avialable : <https://groups.google.com/g/sboc-forum/c/847hqhHLdQg/m/uySeZHFLAgAJ>.
Vimal, R. L. P. (2025b). Towards a Holistic Paradigm: Inseparable-Complementary-Reflective Dual-Aspect Monism and Dvi-Pakṣādvaita Vedānta can bridge Science and Spirituality (Volume 5: Jñāna Yoga and Cosmology). Vision Research Institute: Living Vision and Consciousness Research, 17(7), 1-457. (Vimal, 2025b). Avialable : <https://groups.google.com/g/sboc-forum/c/TG8kVmRF8Vs/m/KlyDkKODEQAJ>
-------------------------------------------------- --------
RāmLakhan Pāndey Vimal, Ph.D.