Windows XP-SP3 Corporate Version FRENCH
Nathanel Svagera
i have an another laptop with windows XP MCE 2005 SP3 (installed yesterday) with some POSready updates (and i install the latest ie8 update...i've downloaded the update in the microsoft update catalog... and TLS 1.0,1.1 and 1.2 are enabled) and i have a weird problem and i don't know how to repair it
when i try to use the microsoft update website, it's stuck to the checking the latest version who permit the use of the website (i'm french and i try my best to translate it ) and the website reload constantly...i tried to downgrade muweb.dll (7.6.7600.257 to 7.6.7600.256) and add MicrosoftUpdateCatalogWebControl.dll in system32
I have found that MS did something to Windows Update Site Agent 3.0 to loop on checking for the latest agent. 7.6 Works fine and i found that no looping is it. Just to inform you all also @dencorso the update agent that you provided to download is 7.6 so good then
I already had Windows Installer 4.5. Windows Update Agent 7.6 with the /wuforce switch restored Microsoft Update on my English XP SP4 POS 2009 installation. Much to my surprise, there were over 80 updates.
I could not install any version of anyconnect at all on my netbook with Windows XP Home edition, SP3 with all necessary updates. MSI installation fails at the same point. I attach 2 pictures and one log which describe my situation. I could not find if somebody reports it in any internet community forums.
Hi, I checked it before I wrote here my problem, the registry path "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce" exists on my pc and of course I install vpn client with admin rights. So I have this registry and still have a problem.
DEBUG: Error 2826: Control BottomLine on dialog PrepareDlg extends beyond the boundaries of the dialog to the right by 3 pixels
The installer has encountered an unexpected error installing this package. This may indicate a problem with this package. The error code is 2826. The arguments are: PrepareDlg, BottomLine, to the right
I tried googling "error 2826" and parts of the error message, and found a wide variety of problems with different solutions. But I am guessing this could have something to do with either the font used on the XP machine or perhaps it has something to do with the character encoding in the clients regional settings.
Hi all, at the end I found out what it causes this error. It is quite simple problem and it is very annoying from Cisco since there is not some special requirements for installation directory where anyconnect should be installed.
I have a netbook Eee PC 901 which it has 2 physical ssd hard disks, one is 4GB C:, the second one is 8GB D:. I really dont know how asus could even imagine users can use windows xp and program files directory together on one small 4GB hard disk, but I had to change system enviroment and the default location Program Files directory, which is on the same disk like %systemroot% directory by default, to second disk D:, so on my netbook I have the "D:\Program Files" directory.
I am confused about cisco anyconnect, because there is not any requirements, that installation need to be strictly in C: and in second there is not any chance to change directory location durring installation, so a man has to change the registry first.
When i was running anyconnect-win-3.1.00495-pre-deploy-k9.msi to install the VPN client to my corporate network I was getting the error "the file installhelper.exe is not marked for installation" first i looked into the registry under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Installer\Products\ (look for the folder with a KEY called ProductName = 'Cisco Anyconnect blablabla' then delete the folder in the registry, could be better if you made a backup of the registry before this).
Space-based imagery now provides the GIS professional with the ability to monitor isolated regions and minority groups at risk of environmental exploitation and human rights abuse. Increased economic globalization and climate change pressure will likely increase the frequency and intensity of regional ethnic and resource motivated conflict. Although the use of high resolution satellite imagery for monitoring human rights abuse was proposed even before the conflict in the former Yugoslavian state of Bosnia, only in the last decade has satellite imagery of sufficiently high resolution become available for mainstream human rights applications. Operators such as GeoEye have provided metric earth observation and analysis with satellites such as IKONOS 2, which travels in a roughly 423km altitude polar orbit around the earth.
I was invited by Survival International, a human rights organization focused primarily on indigenous groups around the globe, to look closely at the Grasberg mine complex in Irian Jaya (West Papua). This request followed previous studies I had been involved with in southern Sudan and Zimbabwe (1-2). We applied to the GeoEye Foundation for satellite imagery data covering this region.
The intention of this particular human rights study was to monitor mining corporation activities in these poorly documented regions. Very few maps and data are available for these areas due to their inherent inaccessibility. It should be noted that severe passive opposition (such as placarded marches, public awareness, use of national and international media, etc.) and active opposition (including deliberately damaging equipment, damaging fuel lines, etc.) near the Grasberg mine has resulted in concerted media interest world-wide. Access to this region is significantly restricted. The recent deaths of two U.S. journalists and the West Papuan leader, Kelly Kwalik, close to the mine in late December 2009 only served to heighten existing tensions in the Irian Jaya region. Kwalik had advocated passive resistance to the occupation of tribal homelands by Indonesian military forces.
A key challenge for confirming human rights abuse allegations is a rapid response to the claims and reports, which often lack precise locations on the ground. Effective and timely response by the international media and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) is hindered by not knowing the size of affected areas, or distribution of numbers of people affected. Furthermore, there is often unwillingness by the local governments to permit access to foreign press members who might verify poor living conditions or provide humanitarian relief to potential "enemies of the state." These fears create a xenophobic response to outside influences. This is evidenced by the rapid response of the international community in the aftermath of Cyclone Nargis in 2008, which was sadly short-circuited to a great extent by the reticence of the Burmese authorities to receive aid.
There has been considerable concern about the indigenous Amungme and Komoro tribes, with the expansive growth in the Grasberg mine. This mine is operated by Rio Tinto (a U.S. registered company) as a 40% joint venture partnership with Freeport McMoran Copper and Gold (FCX) run in partnership with the Indonesian Government. PT Freeport Indonesia (PTFI) is a subsidiary of the U.S. company, Freeport McMoran Copper and Gold Inc. Freeport McMoran Copper and Gold Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and PTFI is listed on the Jakarta Stock Exchange. This mine is the largest gold mine in the world and the third largest copper mine - a significant factor in the Indonesian economic sector.
A relatively recent (2006) and comprehensive report (3) by WAHLI - the Indonesian Forum for Environment, the environmental watchdog of Indonesia - stated significant concerns over Rio Tinto's continued failure to address human rights and workers' rights, as well as shortcomings in environmental protection. The report listed the following: legal breaches, copper wastage and pollution, engineering inadequacies, vegetation smothering, tailings toxicity, estuary habitat destruction, contamination of estuary food chain and ecological disruption.
WALHI's recommendations were very forthright. It recommended that the government immediately enforce national environmental law by halting Freeport-Rio Tinto operations until breaches were remedied, undertake its own thorough and regular sampling, re-examine tax and royalty arrangements, and establish an independent panel to define various issues including processing and waste management. Local communities protesting against environmental and cultural damage by the mine's expansion and operations have been subject to a range of measures including harassment, torture and even murder. It is on such grounds that the Norwegian Pension Fund finally disinvested from Rio Tinto in 2008. For the Amungme and Komoro tribes, the reduction of the once magnificent Mt. Grasberg, one of the largest peaks of the Sudirman range of West Papua, to an intensely excavated plateau has been quite devastating. Tribes were forcefully relocated, leaving thousands of indigenous people removed from their traditional farming and food gathering territories. Moving Amungme to the more tropical lowlands brought people without natural malarial immunity into contact with malaria carrying mosquitoes, which has led to an increase in mortality rates.
The vast Grasberg copper and gold mine (figure 1), at over 2.6M hectares, was first prospected thoroughly by Dutch geologists in the 1930s. It comprises several delicate ecosystems - alpine meadow, wetland and mangrove forest - which make this environmental site world-renowned for its range and diversity of flora and fauna. The mine is seen at the left with glaciers at the right. The accelerated rate of mine and infrastructure development and consequential environmental destruction are set against a backdrop of rising tension. The strong indigenous desire for West Papuan independence, which began during the Indonesian occupation in the1960s, places Grasberg's Freeport mine as a strong contender for the worst case of environmental and human rights abuse of any mining project currently underway in the world.