Last Day On Earth Offline Apk
Berry Spitsberg
Exhibition title: The last off-site show on the Earth at Plague Space and everywhere
(pt. 2 offline)
Artists: Alessandro Simonini, Alex de Roeck, Alex Nowak, Alexander Shameyev, Alexander Volkov, Alina Izmailova, Alisa Smorodina, Alix Bugat, Aliya Bayramova, Anastasia Yusypey, Andrei Beliaev X Daria Ivans, Andrey Karateev, Anna Bobrova, Anton Levin, Anton Osin, Arcangelo Costanzo, Bea Xu, Bene Andrist, Bernd Imminger, Charlotte Eta Mumm, Daniel Robles Lizano, Daniil Epifanov, Danny Milanese, Daria Arbuzova, Daria Kochetkova, Daria Radioryb, Dennis Rudolph, Dilya Garifzhanova, Dmitriy Tzupko, Efim Nadzhaf-Zade, Ekaterina Antoshkina, Ekaterina Gerasimenko, Ekaterina Serikova, Eliška Jahelkov, Ella Wang Olsson (xie3lla), Evgeniy Averin, Evgeny Berezin, Felix Ashford, Gabriele Ciulli, Galya Fadeyeva, Giulia Maria, Gleb Baranov, Hannah Hallam-Eames, Hristos Hantzis, Ilja Zaharov, Ilya Kolesnikov, Iona Mackenzie, Irina Petrakova, Javier Galn, Javier Trivio Murillo, Julie Maurin, Juliette Lena Hager, Jrgen Baumann, Kate Zhilina, Katerina Lukoshkova, Katya Isaeva, Lai Yu Tong, Lilia Kosolapova, Lydia Kuzak, Maksim Novikov, Maria Filimonova, Maria Katyanova, Maria Larionova, Maria Romashka, Marina Goryacheva, Mary Anaskina, Miguel Gaydosh, Miguel Martin, Misha Gudwin, Misha Yurov, Nicky Sparre-Ulrich, Nikos Katsampanis, Noah Greene, Noah Travis Phillips, Oleg Semenovyh, Olga Makhno, Olga Paramonova, Olga Scherbackova, Pasha Shestakov, Pavel Polshchikov, Pedro Gossler, Quinn Girard, Roman Kruglov, Ruslan Kovshik, Ryan Lim Zi Yi, Sam Blackwood, Sasha Deyash, Sasha Kochetkova, Sean Pearson, Sergey Zykov, Sonya Bondareva, Suze Chan, Svetlana Tsepkalo, Thanos Tsiousis, Theresa Tuffner, Tim Cierpiszewski, Tom Putman, Trexy Caio Menezes, Vadim Zaitsev, Valentin Trusov, Vega Sabrinado, Viktor Khyzhniak, Vladislava Tarasova, Xinhan Yu, Yuriy Otinov, Yury Beryozkin, Zu Kalinowska
Curator: PLAGUE
Photo: Angelina Venmer
Installation & support: Vanya Venmer, Vladislava Tarasova, Gleb Baranov,
Zukhra Salakhova, Evgenii Pomozanov, Vlad Semenkov, Arthur Golyakov
This evening, I received an e-mail indicating that our Tempest had gone offline. I wondered if the same thing that happened to me before had happened again, where there was a known glitch in the firmware which caused certain units to go offline. I pulled the mounting pole down just now, untwisted the Tempest from its base and hit the LED reset button. Unlike last time, this time, the LED never gave me any visual feedback. I tried turning the unit on and off with the power switch, but got the same negative results.
Max temperature was 103F. There was absolutely no chance the Styrofoam could melt with the arrangement I used. I checked it periodically. That high temperature was after being in that arrangement overnight.
I have a dbCache.dat file from PC A that's 2Gb in Size, I also have the dat.Index file that goes along with it. Now PC A has been on the internet before obviously. I then disconnected it and I can use google earth offline with the dbCache file.
However , I have a second PC that I'll call PC_B. PC_B installed google earth via a CD that the executable was downloaded to. I then went and placed the cache file and index file in the appropriate spot. However, when opening up google earth I am told that it can not connect to the Google Earth servers to activate the account.
Unfortunately I still haven't been able to get the steps to work. I suspect the reg setting is sensitive to the OS, so I need to create a Win2K virtual machine that I can connect to Google, then copy the reg settings to my target machine.
I don't care if the title of this post breaks some sort of forum usage rule, I just need to make it absolutely plain that I am sick and tired of every last company on Earth insisting I have an account with them and use it whenever I so much as breathe, drink a glass of water or, Chtuluh forbid ! update a HAL library for a microcontroller.
I believe there are more than enough bugs in CubeIDE, let alone actual necessary features that are missing, to keep your developers occupied forever. You did not need to waste everyone's time forcing people to login to ST. This feature brings nothing, helps no one but yourselves, and was asked by absolutely nobody, ever. So please, may I suggest you rethink this stupid, bordering on evil new addition to CubeIDE, and remove it with the next version ?
FYI, some of us work in companies where our computers are not, must not and cannot be, connected to the internet. It's already tough enough installing some of your HAL libraries (the patches) while being offline, we do not need the additional hassle of a login system that does nothing useful anyway.
A tool has to be convenient. If my screwdriver required an internet connection so as to snitch on how many turns I do in each direction depending on my GPS location, I'd start considering switching to fingernails or rocks.
Oh and I haven't checked on my last CubeIDE ticket... did you finally fix the bug where CubeIDE is confused when launching firmware on a target with Flash banks swapped ? Because that would sure be of actual use to the legions of programmers doing FOTA.
Coming back to your specific technical issue with the "offline" use case. This should not be a problem.
The user can use the following workflow on an offline computer without having the new authentication blocking him:
i installed V13.1 and then select new project with H563 , select nucleo-144 board ...and then it could not download the needed Cube package , but asked for login to my.ST --- but i cannot login there !
I have an open source project where I used a CubeMX script to build the code automatically, compile and place the output file ready for programming.
It worked perfectly, the users didn't had to mess with the IDE, only install it and then run the script, it was that easy.
Everyone is asking for personal data, then they screw up, I don't care if it was some evil hacker, the responsability was ultimately yours for storing my data, so you must take care for it.
But looking how their software still has years-long unresolved bugs, guess how the servers are.
Later your email/phone starts getting spammed and receiving strange calls from international numbers.
And your already complicated 15-char password mixing upper and lower case, symbols, numbers and unicorns, impossible to guess, was plainly revealed. Again change them all.
A post-**bleep**up "Sorry" is not enough.
You stated "Offline activation will be available soon." but weeks are passed from the update 2023.09 and the offline activation is still disabled, I have invested lot of time and resources for setup and configure my DAW, as I think many others, and now not only I'm forced to stay with 2022.11 version as you don't let me update it but probably soon even this one will stop working. WHEN offline activation will be available again?
I think you can agree with me that there is a problem when you release a "last or near last" update to a software that can be activated offline and JUST with this update (after five years the people are using it...) you remove the option to activate it. What can we do?
Sorry, but since you decided to announce a new payware Sonar and dismiss CbB it wasn't more easy to remove the activation at all from CbB last updates since you decided to retire it and it was a free (in any sense) and will remain (as it is) a free product anyway? It's simpler than what you have done.
Thanks for you suggestion but even if I plug an external wireless dongle, it's not only CbB that goes online, it's the entire machine, so it's not a solution. Also it needs a browser installed that I have removed from my pc as firewall, antivirus and all rest that is not necessary for fine tuning latency and have better performance.
Incidentally there was always an offline activation option and I supposed due to this, people with fine tuned and streamlined OS versions for optimal perfomance that have removed services from their systems. Why it's not working now?
You need to be patient. They said they will make it available. It is free software and they are basically done with it and moving on to Sonar. They need to focus on the 2 new products not worry about a half dozen off line users. I used to be off line and sure it was a hassle but I would just take my computer to town to my brothers house and update stuff then take it home for another year. Personally if I had no options about the internet I would never depend on software that does.
@John Vere I agree with you and I would like to be patient. The only problem is that this "last or near last" update was in the works for at least ONE year (the last update was the 2022.11). They collect bug reports for one year and when finally release this update the offline activation option was disabled. I as many others had to deal with all these bugs for over one year and now I can't even at least fix them. Also consider that we are in november, the update was released in september and still nothing...
If they are not ready to change the offline activation scheme also for this product, leave it as it was (it's a retired product in any case) or remove it but don't change it and push out an update knowing before that there will be people (don't matter how many) that can't use it.
Also I think this it's not a debate about DAW pc online vs oflline. Both solution have valid arguments on their side anyways but these are arguments for another topic. Here the problem is another, offline activation suddenly removed from the last update of a retired product and why it takes so long to be restored.
d3342ee215