Oreo Action

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Yoshi Heffernan

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 2:09:25 PM8/5/24
to condonanre
Im using the action_PROCESS_TEXT intent to provide a custom text selection action. On Marshmallow I am getting my action displayed on both readonly text and EditText controls and my code successfully displays/returns results.

On Oreo (Pixel 2 XL) my action is successfully displayed on read only text but I am not getting my action displayed on EditText controls, either in my own app or others. I also notice that other process text app's such as Google Translate are only randomly displayed.


Mondelez reportedly earned more than $31 billion in revenue in 2022, and some of its most popular products include Oreos, Chips Ahoy, Clif Bars and Toblerone. However, the Mondelez class action lawsuit alleges the company profits by paying local cocoa farmers as little as $3 per day, causing them to resort to child labor and child slavery.


Consumers are willing to pay a premium for sustainable and ethically sourced products, the child slavery class action lawsuit says. Van Meter points to a study showing 60% of consumers would stop purchasing a product if they knew human trafficking or forced labor played a role in its production.


In Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC v Y Merba Israel Ltd (CA 358/11, November 30 2011), the Supreme Court has reversed the district court's dismissal of a passing-off action brought by Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC against the retailers of Go-Go's sandwich cookies for allegedly copying the trade dress of its Oreo brand of cookies.


Plaintiff Kraft manufactures the Oreo sandwich cookies. It sued the retailers of sandwich cookies marketed under the name Go-Go's on the grounds of passing off and infringement of a well-known mark, seeking injunction and damages.






The defendants argued that their products not only bore the MERBA mark, but also had a different get-up due to, among other things, the differences in size and colour of the products. They further argued that pictures of black cookies filled with white cream, the colour blue, a background of splashing milk, the repetition of the letter 'O' and embossed logos were common in the trade both worldwide and locally.


The district court dismissed the action, holding that the get-up of the products was not sufficiently similar. The court observed that each party's product prominently bore their respective word marks (OREO and GO-GO'S) and differed in size, colour (the defendants' packaging was purple, while Kraft's packaging used shades of blue) and graphics (the number of cookies was different and the defendants' packaging depicted a girl). It further found that the use of pictures of sandwich cookies against a background of splashing milk was common in the trade. The court noted that Kraft's consumer survey was conducted before the consumers were exposed to the defendants' product and, therefore, could not support a likelihood of confusion.


The court also dismissed Kraft's argument that the creation of initial interest sufficed for a finding of likelihood of confusion (where the products were placed side-by-side on store shelves). The court pointed out that, under the tort of passing off, consumers must be mistaken into believing that the defendant's product originates from the plaintiff. Here, a reasonable consumer would not associate Go-Go's cookies with Kraft or the Oreo brand. The court further held that the claim that the Oreo get-up was a well-known mark would not avail the plaintiff, as the similarity was not confusing. Finally, the court stated that little weight was to be given to the fact that both products depicted sandwich cookies against a background of splashing milk, as they both contained black sandwich cookies filled with vanilla cream.


The settlement terms prohibited the further importation of the Go-Go's product in the same packaging, but allowed the importation of the product in a different packaging.


Orit Gonen and Sonia Shnyder, Gilat Bareket & Co, Reinhold Cohn Group, Tel Aviv


Legal updates Japan Japan rejects Google opposition against FITBEING Australia Australia awards A$250,000 in additional damages to Vitaco Health China What applicants need to know about partial design examination in China India AP Mller Mrsk obtains ex parte injunction against Maersk Pharma in India View more Legal updates Unlock unlimited access to all WTR content


For years, we have actively worked with our global suppliers to ensure that the palm oil we use in our products is sustainably sourced and fully traceable. In fact, we were the first multinational consumer goods company to require suppliers to trace all the oil they sell, not just the oil they sell to us.


In 2014, we published our Palm Oil Action Plan, a long-term roadmap to achieve a sustainable palm oil supply, which we launched after achieving our milestone of 100% Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) Palm coverage in 2013. The Palm Oil Action Plan defines our position and principles for palm oil sustainability, focusing on supplier expectations, government and sector engagement in key origins and global industry advocacy toward sector transformation.


By the end of 2019, 98 percent of the palm oil sourced by our company was traceable to the mill, and 98 percent was purchased from suppliers with published policies that are aligned with best practice sustainable principles.


From 2020, we require traceable, forest-monitored palm oil from mills across our supply chain. The new requirements include traceability to plantation and satellite monitoring covering all palm oil concessions supplying mills attributed to the company, against the deforestation criteria set out in its Palm Oil Action Plan. All mills must be identified on Global Forest Watch, with no active grievances against concessions in their direct supply, or operated by the same producer groups elsewhere. In addition, suppliers must have third-party assurance of their monitoring process and systems used and be subject to cross-check by Mondelēz International.


From Q1 2021, we expect 80% of its palm oil to meet these enhanced expectations with strong supplier partnership, working to increase coverage as quickly as possible. The enhanced sourcing requirements will improve transparency across the sector by requiring suppliers to confirm sustainable sourcing practices across their entire supply chain by 2025, not just the portion supplied to Mondelēz International.


The Mondelēz International Palm Oil Action Plan details actions to achieve our goals to make sustainable palm oil the mainstream option, based on the principles that production should be on legally held land; not lead to deforestation or loss of peat land; respect human rights, including land rights; and not use forced or child labor.


We continue to maintain our engagement with these and other stakeholders in the palm oil sector to ensure we learn and contribute toward our common goal of achieving palm oil sustainability. Since 2018, we have called for our suppliers to act faster to eliminate deforestation and to map and monitor all palm oil plantations and concessions. Specifically, we have asked our suppliers to commit to palm oil concession mapping and monitoring as a vital step to accountability and change. Our work with these organizations is based on our view that the complex challenge of producing sustainable palm oil can only be solved through collaboration with all actors in the palm oil supply chain, from growers to suppliers and buyers, as well as local and national government and non-governmental organizations. We remain committed to achieving complete sustainability and transparency across our supply chain and the industry at large, and will continue to provide regular updates on our progress.


The Power Manager (PowerMgr) allows an app to perform certain OS- and power-related actions on the device. These include rebooting or performing an OS update, resetting the device to a factory-fresh state or putting the device into Sleep mode. On some devices, such as the VC8x vehicle-mounted computer and similarly equipped Zebra devices, PowerMgr also can control device heaters and perform actions based on ignition status of the vehicle. PowerMgr performs only actions; it currently supports no queries other than to determine the version of the CSP that implements PowerMgr itself.


It's important to note that PowerMgr actions such as Reboot and Reset, once executed, prevent the execution of subsequent actions submitted by the Request XML document, including the submission of a Result XML to the application sending the original Request. Zebra therefore recommends using Condition Manager in conjunction with PowerMgr to ensure that appropriate conditions exist on a device before attempting to perform "risky" operations such as OS updates, the failure of which can render a device unusable, severely limited or otherwise in need of service.


On Android devices, Sleep mode turns off the device display screen and places some subsystems into low-power states. Depending on device configuration settings, certain apps and/or subsystems such as Wi-Fi and Cellular might remain active.


Rebooting an Android device generally causes only volatile information such as application state and transient data to be lost. Non-volatile data such as device settings and stored apps and data are preserved. A Reboot is sometimes referred to as a "Reset" or "Normal Reset," but is not to be confused with an Enterprise Reset or Factory Reset (explained below).


IMPORTANT: The Reboot Action causes the device to immediately restart, which prevents any subsequent Actions from executing, including the submission of a Result XML to the application sending the original request.


Enterprise Reset is intended to return the device to an enterprise-defined default state, generally as determined by the contents of the /enterprise partition. On Zebra devices running Android, an Enterprise Reset is the same as a Factory Reset except that the /enterprise partition is preserved. This action is supported only on Zebra devices running Android 4.4 KitKat and later. On Zebra Android devices running Android Jelly Bean or earlier, the same action could be performed using the "OS Update" action if a suitable OS Update .zip file was used.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages