Please Stand By Free Download
Viola Mathenia
Trying to log in to smart sheet and it keeps spinning and saying "Please stand by while SmartSheet is loading". All other sites work fine, just can't get in to Smartsheet, unless I go to an incognito window. Using Safari on Mac. Thanks!
"Firewall is starting. Please stand by while the system finishes loading. Firewall management and security services willl be available shortly. You will be redirected to the login screen, once starup is complete."
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered to be an autoimmune, inflammatory disease of the CNS. In most patients, the disease follows a relapsing-remitting course and is characterized by dynamic inflammatory demyelinating lesions in the CNS. Although on the surface MS may appear consistent with a primary autoimmune disease, questions have been raised as to whether inflammation and/or autoimmunity are really at the root of the disease, and it has been proposed that MS might in fact be a degenerative disorder. We argue that MS may be an 'immunological convolution' between an underlying primary degenerative disorder and the host's aberrant immune response. To better understand this disease, we might need to consider non-inflammatory primary progressive MS as the 'real' MS, with inflammatory forms reflecting secondary, albeit very important, reactions.
I have seen this issue on a number of peoples systems, several had success by uninstalling chrome and reinstalling, seemed to fix some broken component, if you decide to go down this route, please back up your password store (if you use this functionality)
But to be honest... I love my life today. Yes, there are some things I wish I could change. BUT If you have been around me for any length of time in the last 4-5 months there is utter JOY in what I am honored and humbled to do each day! IT is celebrating the simple joys of my life. Tonight, I can drink red wine and eat popcorn for dinner if I want! Haha, and I do! AND my biggest hearts cry for all the other Single Ladies, who are standing, is that we would not settle. We would not compromise. We would hope in the Lord, who KNOWS the desires of our hearts! I have seen amazing marriages and really hard ones. Not to say the hard ones have settled, but I know that I will not be blissfully happy forever when he, "puts a ring on it!" Life does not seem to work that way, and it appears marriage does not either! I will ALWAYS need my God, and so in this season of my life who better to search after, know more intimately, and seek then God alone!
The social pressure of continuing these norms keeps us standing unless we find a solid reason that we choose not to. However even when students make that decision, they still receive backlash for their differences in opinion.
Now, I know, and knew even as a young man, that I did not have a halachic obligation to stand. And yet, the overt sense that there was no place for me in the choreography of the service created great discomfort.
If the root end isn\u2019t fresh and clean, cut off a bit of it, stick the stalk in jar filled with about 3 inches of water and keep the jar near a sunny window or even outside. Change the water once a week. After a while, the stalk(s) will sprout roots. At that point, plant it deep enough (about 2 inches should be covered) so the stalk stands. Water like you would any other vegetable and it will grow and spread. Be patient.
Among the standard c\u01A1m t\u1EA5m accompaniments is b\u00EC, a shredded pork skin mixture flavored with nutty ground rice and ch\u1EA3 tr\u1EE9ng h\u1EA5p (steamed egg \u201Cmeatloaf\u201D). If you want to try the works, scan any c\u01A1m t\u1EA5m restaurant menu for a fully loaded version.
I should make it clear at the outset that I do not understand this article as offering reasons not to read them. In spite of my best efforts to avoid giving precisely this impression, some people have assimilated my efforts to the way that certain scholars attempted to use the facts of Heideggerʼs involvement with National Socialism as a way to expel him from the canon: according to Gilbert Ryle, because Heidegger was not a good man, he cannot have been a good philosopher. [2] But I have never used that argument, nor sought to apply any variation of it to the works of Locke or Kant. My point is not that we should now bypass these thinkers, but that, given their unquestioned importance, such that we cannot afford not to read them, we should make their racism a further reason to interrogate them. In other words, because they were unquestionably major philosophers whose impact lives on outside the academy as well as in it, their racism has a particular claim to our attention. This is what makes Kantʼs racism more philosophically interesting than that of Christoph Meiners, for example. So how should we address the racism of Locke and Kant? I will detail three initial tasks, but this is not intended as an exhaustive list.
For fifty years or so historians of philosophy have believed that they can write a work in the history of philosophy and brazenly rewrite the arguments of the canonical philosophers, if they think they can improve on what those philosophers had managed for themselves. For example, Bernard Williams in the preface to his book on Descartes explains that because Descartesʼ work was inevitably and essentially ʻambiguous, incomplete, imperfectly determined by the authorʼs and his contemporariesʼ understandingʼ, he would take it upon himself to write a ʻrational reconstruction of Descartesʼ thoughtʼ. [19] The history of ideas, he explained, is ʻan historical enquiry and the genre of the resulting work is unequivocally historyʼ, but the history of philosophy faces ʻa cut-off point, where authenticity is replaced as the objective by the aim of articulating philosophical ideas.ʼ [20] Clearly the casualty of such efforts is an understanding of the historical dimension of a philosopherʼs work and I believe that this leaves anyone who takes this route ill-equipped to address the question of the coexistence in the same thinker of both racism and moral universalism, which is why they tend to ignore one or the other, usually the racism. This approach allows philosophers to persist in presenting racism as no more than a surface feature of a philosophy, in contrast with moral universalism, which is a philosophical thesis that, as such, will always trump racist particularism.
The point of contention here is not the racism of the historical Kant, which Hill and Boxill concede, but how philosophers can come to a better understanding of how racism operates, the better to understand and so combat it. Hill and Boxill believe that in spite of his racism, Kantʼs moral theory ʻcan serve as a reasonable framework for addressing contemporary racial problems, provided it is suitably supplemented with realistic awareness of the facts about racism and purged from associations with certain false empirical beliefs and inessential derivative thesesʼ. But the problem of the coexistence of what they deem to be Kantʼs racist attitudes and his philosophical ideas incompatible with those attitudes is not pursued. This is all the more surprising because their defence of Kant as a philosophical resource to address racism and particularly their defence of ʻreasonable deliberation and dialogue to address racial problemsʼ leads them to argue for an examination of racism in terms that I fully endorse. This is what they say: ʻsuch use of reason must be informed by an adequate understanding of the empirical facts about racism, its genesis, its stubbornness, its hiding-places, its interplay with other factors, and the most affective means to combat itʼ. [29] My response is that if one indeed wants to address racism, then investigating Kantʼs racism in its coexistence with cosmopolitanism would have been a good place to start. One finds there an influential, articulate racism whose genesis, stubbornness, self-deception, and interplay with its opposite that is there to be studied. But how is this to be done?
Given the complexities of these issues, it is important for payments companies to understand the nature of their services and how they fit within the card network rules, and for merchants seeking processing services to understand what they are being offered. Otherwise, payments companies risk entering into arrangements that do not comply with the network rules or applicable law; it is therefore better for all involved for the real merchant (of record) to please stand up.
This past week, I learned a better way. I led a workshop with Carolyn Thompson and Samuel Kabue, who are both involved in the Ecumenical Disability Advocates Network. Carolyn introduced me to an elegant and inclusive way to invite people to stand up which turns the command (Please stand) into an invitation.
For example, is videotaping kids in church inappropriate? I hope not. I just did that a couple weeks ago myself. But is standing in front of others who are seated behind you inappropriate? Yes, it's inconsiderate of others. So maybe the video-tapers could be encouraged gently to step to the side of the church to avoid standing in front of others.
However, this was her first night with us. She had been brought as a guest. After she had attended a couple of times, I pulled her aside and talked with her about WHY her clothing was distracting for others (she had never thought about it) and gave her some very tangible guidelines (stomach can't show, shorts need to be visible from beneath your t-shirt). She trusted me and the other leaders enough not to be offended and to understand why we were placing these restrictions on her. If we had "thrown her out" the first night, would she be a junior counselor today? Would she have been baptized? I don't think so.
It is my hope that this article helps you understand yourself better. There are many ways you differ from others. However, it doesn't all come down to the extraversion-introversion dimension. Maybe you realized that instead of being an introvert, you are actually an extravert (enthusiastic and assertive) who is also a highly sensitive person. Or maybe you realized that you are really an extravert who likes to daydream and reflect deeply about ideas. Or maybe you even realized you are actually an introvert who daydreams a lot, or an introvert who doesn't have a vivid fantasy life but is high in intellectual curiosity. All of these combinations are possible, and more.
760c119bf3