It would be great if we could set up a link somewhere to all of our CC courses. It would help us improve our courses, and perhaps more people will start offering CC at their schools. Thanks again for the great posts and see you at ICCC!
I think it is a great idea to have a section in the official ACC website for gathering resources and sharing experiences!
There are endless ways of teaching CC. We need to learn from each other. I am interested in comparing different approaches; e.g. what the PROSSECO's gang (PROSSECO is an European project) does, what people in Europe that do not participate in PROSSECO do and what people in other parts of the world (e.g. USA, Canada, Australia, Filipinas, México and so on) do in order to organise a course in CC.
I hope colleagues get excited about this initiative.
I share my experience in the topic.
The first time I tough a course on CC was in January 2002, in the postgraduate program in Computer Science at the UNAM (National University).
In general I do similar things to what Anna and Maya have described: a general introduction to creativity (mainly from a psychological and philosophical perspective); then we read and discuss different papers describing running systems, methodologies, and so on (during such discussions I encourage students to analyse what are the limitations and the contributions of such systems to the understanding of creativity; i.e. it is not enough to generate “something”); we have also done the exercise of studying one particular work and then organising discussion groups of critical vs. supportive students; we study in deep the models we have created in our research group and discuss their scope and limitations with students (this exercise has been very productive); and, of course, students develop a final project.
Sometimes I have had the opportunity to teach this course together with Atocha Aliseda, a colleague from the Institute of Philosophical Research at the UNAM.
When we teach the course together, we have groups of students coming from postgraduate programs in Computer Sciences and in Philosophy of Science. As a result, we have engineers, mathematicians, physicist, psychologists, philosophers, anthropologist…, in the same group.
This has been a really great experience!
The discussions are richer and it has produced really interesting results.
I strongly recommend this interdisciplinary approach.
Last time, I had the pleasure to teach this course together with Wendy, a former PhD student of mine. This is the web page of the course:
http://wendysan.wix.com/cc-2016
At ICCC this year, is there any room in the schedule to have a discussion about teaching CC? Or perhaps we can have this discussion alongside ICCC, during a lunchtime or evening slot? I'd be very keen to compare syllabi etc.
Anna
Dear all,
Thanks Hannu and Carlos for rising this theme, thanks everybody for the relevant contributions. This is being an inspiring discussion.
Following a suggestion that some of you make, the organisation of the ICCC 2016 analysed the possibility of promoting a discussion session about this theme during the conference. As you know, the number of submissions and the accepted papers increased a lot this year. As a consequence, the program is already very dense.
Still, we decided to promote a special panel on Friday, immediately after the “Community Meeting”, 14-15:30, in the main room.
Anna Jordanous accepted to chair this pannel (thanks Anna).
We all look forward to a very interesting and useful discussion.
Amilcar
> On 17/05/2016, at 18:42, Joe Corneli <j.co...@gold.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Cf. Ashok Goel in recent news:
>
> «A really fun thing in this class has been once students knew about Jill
> they were so motivated, so engaged. I’ve never seen this kind of
> motivation and engagement. What a beautiful way of teaching artificial
> intelligence.»
>
> From: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2016/05/11/this-professor-stunned-his-students-when-he-revealed-the-secret-identity-of-his-teaching-assistant/
>
> Some folks in the G+ discussion where I found this link questioned how
> this work would/could generalise:
>
> «I teach writing. None of my work can be automated in this way. Of
> course, maybe SOMEDAY they will invent a grammar checker that is not
> total crapola. That would be nice. [...] I teach appx. 80-90 students
> every semester, and I'm responding with detailed feedback to their
> formal writing every week.» -Laura Gibbs
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Computational Creativity Forum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to computational-creativity-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to computational-creativity-fo...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to
> To post to this group, send email to
> Visit this group at
> https://groups.google.com/group/computational-creativity-forum.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/computational-creativity-forum/8a04fc05-7150-4274-9f6f-3cc8d74c0a6b%40googlegroups.com.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Computational Creativity Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to computational-creativity-forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to computational-creativity-fo...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/computational-creativity-forum.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/computational-creativity-forum/557eaa7d-6d8e-425f-aa28-1c65d483e87c%40googlegroups.com.