What kind of person will easy to accept the quantum Hamilton mechanics

[Han]

Hi, everyone, how do you think about what kind of person will easy to
accept our new theory? I think maybe the one who cannot accept the
quantum mechanics or who can accept the Chinese culture. What do you
think? Or can share your mind with us!!

[Micha Czapski]

Hi Han,
Very interesting question. In my opinion - this theory is much easier
to accept rather than normal quantum mechanics. The Newtonian laws are
tought in primary school and they are easily understandable. In
comparison q.m. postulates seem to be wooden. Students like us who
still learn about q.m. can easily switch to new theory but tutors and
lectureres might be more sceptical about it.

[Han]

Wow, it is good to know that!! As Prof. Yang says, the yang people
play the major role in the new physics revolution. The longer the
people study q.m, the more difficult to them to accept the new theory.
The ego of themself occupy their mind. I am so glad that we can
witness the history page of the physics revolution. ^.^

[Micha Czapski]

different approaches should always meet somewhere. I think one of the
common points is correspondce princple, maybe this is another step to
tighten both theories. I wonder if there is any divergence about
results, because there should be focused the research.

[Han]

Yes, I agree with that the different approaches should always meet
somewhere.
Actually, there are some research in the world using the similar
concept (deterministic way) to try to combine the two
mechanics~quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. For example, dBB
theory, semi-classical quantum mechanics, PT sysmetry Hamiltonian,
etc. If you have read some of them, you may find out that there are
some similar approach compare with us. But most of them did not
provide a complete theory or explain some question very well. It still
very important, because there are more and more evidences show that
the complex dimension is the way to lead us explore the puzzle. I
don't if I have anwsered your question properly. ^.^

> > witness the history page of the physics revolution. ^.^- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -

[Micha Czapski]

I surely must read more about it. Next week i'm taking an exam in
quantum mechanics so now I will more deeply focus on some points.
Teorethical physics isnt exactly my cup of tea. I focus more on
applied physics in which I major, still, it is good to broaden your
mind esspecially in q.m. which is very controversial at some points.