HW2 problems?

43 views
Skip to first unread message

CM

unread,
Sep 18, 2017, 6:46:50 AM9/18/17
to comphys
I see that E2.1(a) is assigned.  There's no 2.1(a), though.  Did you mean 2.1, or 2.2(a)?

Jay Wang

unread,
Sep 18, 2017, 3:30:17 PM9/18/17
to comphys
There is a slight difference here between the lecture notes (draft) and the book.
If you are referring to the book, it should be E2.2 (a).
On the manuscript notes, it is E2.1(a)

CM

unread,
Sep 19, 2017, 3:22:37 PM9/19/17
to comphys
This question wants us to show second order accuracy, and the equivalence of 2 different RK2 methods.  Is it sufficient to demonstrate accuracy and equivalence by numerically solving an ODE?  Or are you looking for a traditional proof?

Jay Wang

unread,
Sep 19, 2017, 3:48:36 PM9/19/17
to comphys
 It's asking for an analytic proof. Expand k2 in powers of h, and show that the error is of the order h^3.
If you like, you may assume explicit dependence on t of the derivative f(t) to make it easier.

Of course, it'd be complete if you test this to be true numerically too (not required).
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
Message has been deleted
0 new messages