> > >> Dariusz Dolecki <
dariusz.dole...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >Am I correct in assuming that Sun/Oracle recommends UPGRADING FIRST to
> > >> >the highest release instead of applying the recommended patch cluster?
>
> > >> I've not seen that recommendation.
>
> > >> John
>
> > >Some info is here:
> > >
http://www.scribd.com/doc/40022723/Patching-Best-Practices#outer_page_4
>
> > It should be easier in Solaris 11.
>
> > One of the things you can't do in Solaris 10 and before is adding
> > packages after you've patched the system: because you don't know whether
> > the packages you just added were modified by the installed packages.
>
> > In Solaris 11, upgrade to a specific release and all the packages in
> > that release will compatible and have the same bugs applied to them.
>
> > The only downside is that you cannot avoid one particular patch; it
> > is all or nothing; but you can always revert to the older release.
>
> > The upside of having fewer choices it that the packages are always
> > integrated in the same set and that means that all packages get
> > the same exposure.
>
> > Casper
>
> Casper,
>
> Thanks for posting in this thread, I always look forward to your valuable opinions. You are correct about S11, however, my question is regarding S10 patching best practises. There was a "bigadmin" post about this by "Enda O'Connor" titled "the Patch Management Best Practices" guide, which I cannot now find.
>
> Is Sun/Oracle's recommendation to upgrade to the highest possible release than patch?
>
> Thanks again for taking the time to pitch in. I need an answer about S10.