per my understanding, interactive id is something which require
access
to SHELL or execute from SHELL.
Thanks,
Naru
> Hi can someone let me know the difference between the Interactive and
> Non Interactive user id's?
It's not a distinction that I recognise. Where did you hear about it,
and what was the context?
--
\ “Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood |
`\ it.” —Niels Bohr |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
> Naru <nvu...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Hi can someone let me know the difference between the Interactive and
> > Non Interactive user id's?
> It's not a distinction that I recognise. Where did you hear about it,
> and what was the context?
Just a guess: it sounds like a distinction between a user that gets a
shell upon login vs a user that gets a non-escapable application program
upon login.
--
John Gordon A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
gor...@panix.com B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
-- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"
> In <87iqj2a...@benfinney.id.au> Ben Finney
> <bignose+h...@benfinney.id.au> writes:
>
> > Naru <nvu...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > > Hi can someone let me know the difference between the Interactive and
> > > Non Interactive user id's?
>
> > It's not a distinction that I recognise. Where did you hear about it,
> > and what was the context?
>
> Just a guess: it sounds like a distinction between a user that gets a
> shell upon login vs a user that gets a non-escapable application program
> upon login.
I suspect he's thinking of the user id's that are intended to be used
for daemons or setuid applications, not for normal logins by users.
These typically have something like /bin/false as their login shell, and
usually don't have a password set.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
> In <87iqj2a...@benfinney.id.au> Ben Finney <bignose+h...@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> > Naru <nvu...@gmail.com> writes:
> > > Hi can someone let me know the difference between the Interactive
> > > and Non Interactive user id's?
>
> > It's not a distinction that I recognise. Where did you hear about it,
> > and what was the context?
>
> Just a guess
[…]
Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> I suspect he's thinking of
[…]
In the face of ambiguity, and especially when the person is around to
answer requests for clarification, I prefer to refuse the temptation to
guess.
--
\ “Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea |
`\ of liberty.” —Thomas Jefferson |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
> John Gordon <gor...@panix.com> writes:
>
> > In <87iqj2a...@benfinney.id.au> Ben Finney
> > <bignose+h...@benfinney.id.au> writes:
> > > Naru <nvu...@gmail.com> writes:
> > > > Hi can someone let me know the difference between the Interactive
> > > > and Non Interactive user id's?
> >
> > > It's not a distinction that I recognise. Where did you hear about it,
> > > and what was the context?
> >
> > Just a guess
> […]
>
>
> Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>
> > I suspect he's thinking of
> […]
>
>
> In the face of ambiguity, and especially when the person is around to
> answer requests for clarification, I prefer to refuse the temptation to
> guess.
My experience is that people who ask questions like the OP don't
understand your type of response. It's more helpful to try possible
answers, and if that's not what they're talking about they can clarify.
If I remember right there is no such thing as InterActive and Non-
InterActive UIDs but you have processes that are spun off on initial
boot that will run as you but arent started by you. Such as (in KDE)
the plasma Desktop shell.