Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Which branch?

4 views
Skip to first unread message

tim1948

unread,
Oct 2, 2012, 2:46:53 PM10/2/12
to
I'm planning to install FreeBSD (x64) on a computer that already has Linux on it. I hope to use the new FreeBSD installation for routine tasks, but I might want to adapt to new developments, particularly in multimedia, that were not immediately incorporated into the RELEASE branch.

Assuming that STABLE is right for me, there don't seem to be any snapshots available for it online (9.0), as there have been with past releases. Or am I looking in the wrong place? Otherwise I'd use updates with the RELEASE version, I guess.

practice

unread,
Oct 3, 2012, 2:55:27 AM10/3/12
to
On 10/02/2012 13:46, tim1948 wrote:
> I'm planning to install FreeBSD (x64) on a computer that already has Linux on it. I hope to use the new FreeBSD installation for routine tasks, but I might want to adapt to new developments, particularly in multimedia, that were not immediately incorporated into the RELEASE branch.
>
> Assuming that STABLE is right for me, there don't seem to be any snapshots available for it online (9.0), as there have been with past releases. Or am I looking in the wrong place? Otherwise I'd use updates with the RELEASE version, I guess.
>


Have you tried distrowatch.com?

John McCue

unread,
Oct 3, 2012, 5:57:02 PM10/3/12
to
tim1948 <iconok...@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip long line>
Please correct you news client,
long lines look terrible in regular clients :)
>
> Assuming that STABLE is right for me, there don't seem
> to be any snapshots available for it online (9.0), as there
> have been with past releases. Or am I looking in the wrong
> place? Otherwise I'd use updates with the RELEASE version,
> I guess.

My understanding is there is no real thing as "9.0 STABLE".
I would suggest 9.0 Release and then move on from there.
Please see:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html


John

User Bp

unread,
Oct 4, 2012, 11:18:24 PM10/4/12
to
John McCue <jmc...@jmclin0.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> wrote:
>
> My understanding is there is no real thing as "9.0 STABLE".
> I would suggest 9.0 Release and then move on from there.
> Please see:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html

The tag RELENG_9 might do what is wanted when used with csup
or cvsup. The supfile is


*default host=cvsup11.us.freebsd.org compress
#*default release=cvs
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default delete use-rel-suffix
src-all
src-eBones
src-secure
#ports-all tag=.

The resulting system reports from uname -a
FreeBSD www.zefox.org 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #14: Fri Sep 21 20:28:02 PDT 2012

This isn't what the OP was looking for, but I think it's the only
present method.

Hope this helps,

bob prohaska
0 new messages