On 8/29/22 8:39 AM, Skep Dick wrote:
> On Monday, 29 August 2022 at 13:49:22 UTC+2,
richar...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 8/29/22 12:46 AM, wij wrote:
>> In fact, there is a special name for functions that have the property
>> that f(c) = lim(x->c) f(x), that is they are continuous functions.
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
>
> So you are overtly admitting that lim(x->∞) f(x) is NOT continuous.
You seem to not understand what continuous means.
"Limits" are not continuous, "Functions" are, and lim(x->∞) f(x) isn't a
function (there is no parametric symbol to be a function of).
Function F is said to be continuous at point c if f(c) = lim(x->c) f(x),
and continuous over an interval if it is continuous at all points in
that interval.
Since ∞ isn't a real number, we never evaluate f(x) at ∞ so we can't
talk about it being continuous there. At best we can talk about it being
continuous on an interval that goes to infinity, like [0,∞)
Note, the ∞ limit is open, not closed, as there IS no closed interval to
infinitiy available in The Reals.
I will admit that I don't fully understand this, but I don't see
anything in there that actually talks about working in R, or
representing things as continuous data streams.
I do see mentions of the limitations of this sort of work, and even some
mentions of it being in opposition to some of the classical theories,
which says that it can't just be melded into those theories.
I get the impression that you are just throwing the spagetti at the wall
and seeing what sticks, all the while enjoying the mess you are making.
You made the mess, you get to clean it up.