I have been working on an XPath 2.0/XSLT 2.0 implementation for
libxml2/libxslt. They are C libraries, rather than C++, but the
interface to C++ is trivial.
Work is stalled at the moment due to lack of resources (time and/or
money). Contact me for further information.
Cheers,
Steve Ball
I posted my initial enquiry about XSLT 2 for C++ on Dec 12, 2009.
As of Dec 18, 2009 you are the only respondent (thanks).
That's fair enough time for a market survey in this forum.
Accordingly there can only be two possible conclusions:
1. Few people read comp.text.xml, or
2. Few people are interested in XSLT 2 for C or C++
Sadly this looks like that even if one were to produce a FOSS version
of XSLT 2 for, say, C++, the said one could not even give it away.
On a positive note though, one can say that more people seem to care
about global warming .. so guess that's a good thing.
Jim :-(
--
Joe Kesselman,
http://www.love-song-productions.com/people/keshlam/index.html
{} ASCII Ribbon Campaign | "may'ron DaroQbe'chugh vaj bIrIQbej" --
/\ Stamp out HTML mail! | "Put down the squeezebox & nobody gets hurt."
> I posted my initial enquiry about XSLT 2 for C++ on Dec 12, 2009.
> As of Dec 18, 2009 you are the only respondent (thanks).
> That's fair enough time for a market survey in this forum.
> Accordingly there can only be two possible conclusions:
>
> 1. Few people read comp.text.xml, or
> 2. Few people are interested in XSLT 2 for C or C++
By "XSLT 2 for C++" do you mean an XSLT 2 engine, or a library
for constructing XSLT 2 engines, written in C++?
I think a newsgroup is usually not a good place to take a
market survey -- doubly so if there other discussion groups
that are more narrowly focused on the issue.
There is always interest in well-written free(*) software.
-- Bill
(*) "free" as in "free speech", not "free beer".