> To create nomenclature or list of symbols I found the below packages.
seems that you missed to add the packages you found ...
Regards,
Stefan
interesting package selection ;-)
anyways I think I'd recommend the glossaries package. Mostly because it
is modern and well maintained.
I haven't tried it yet myself, but will shortly for my Danish LaTeX book.
--
/daleif (remove RTFSIGNATURE from email address)
LaTeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
LaTeX book: http://www.imf.au.dk/system/latex/bog/ (in Danish)
Remember to post minimal examples, see URL below
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=minxampl
http://www.minimalbeispiel.de/mini-en.html
nomencl may be all you need.
> Dear Torben,
>
>> To create nomenclature or list of symbols I found the below packages.
> seems that you missed to add the packages you found ...
Sorry, here they are
1 listofsymbols Create and manipulate lists of symbols
2 nomencl Produce lists of symbols as in nomenclature.
3 nomentbl Nomenclature typeset in a longtable
> Torben Knudsen wrote:
>> To create nomenclature or list of symbols I found the below packages.
>> I haven't done such lists before. Some of the packages seems a bit
>> old. Does anyone have suggestions for which to use or maybe
>> suggestions for better ones?
>
> interesting package selection ;-)
>
> anyways I think I'd recommend the glossaries package. Mostly because
> it is modern and well maintained.
>
> I haven't tried it yet myself, but will shortly for my Danish LaTeX
> book.
I now finally made a nomunclature. I first considered to install
glossaries but even the installation seem complicated to me. Moreover
the whole packages seemed large and complicated.
Then I installed nomencl which is simpler but I think it works fine.
If anyone have good arguments for another packages I am interested.
Thanks for the help.
Installation of ctan packages is elegantly managed by TeX Live 2009. So
I haven't come into any problems with installing glossaries.
One key thing about glossaries is that its author is actively developing
it and offering solutions in a prompt mannner whenever questions are
posted to this group (which I'm very grateful). As a bonus, glossaries
offers more features than similar packages.
But I agree the document is a bit daunting. I actually got started with
glossaries through this know-how doc� on www.latex-community.org.
Best wishes,
Leo
Footnotes:
� http://www.latex-community.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=263%3Aglossaries-nomenclature-lists-of-symbols-and-acronyms&catid=55%3Alatex-general&Itemid=112
--
Emacs uptime: 63 days, 1 hour, 39 minutes, 31 seconds