I have always heard that to guarantee a safe accessibility to pdf
files and a clean display of the fonts we should use type 1 fonts, and
that Arial and Times New Roman are not part of type 1 fonts.
What I dont understand is that I do use Arial and Times New Roman in
my tex files and every time I look at the fonts using Adobe Reader it
is says that Arial and Times New Roman are type 1 fonts.
Arial appears as "embed subset" while Times New Roman appears as "type
1, actual font: TimesNewRoman-PSMT, actual font type: truetype".
In conclusion, can I keep using these two fonts and still be sure they
will not be rendered as type 3 or have problems when
I have always heard that to guarantee a safe accessibility to pdf
files and a clean display of the fonts we should use type 1 fonts, and
that Arial and Times New Roman are not part of type 1 fonts.
What I dont understand is that I do use Arial and Times New Roman in
my tex files and every time I look at the fonts using Adobe Reader it
is says that Arial and Times New Roman are type 1 fonts.
Arial appears as "embed subset" while Times New Roman appears as "type
1, actual font: TimesNewRoman-PSMT, actual font type: truetype" (what
it means, I do not know).
In conclusion, can I keep using these two fonts and still be sure they
will not be rendered as type 3 by other users or have problems when
printing?
actually, the requirement is that the fonts should be in _outline_
font formats, not 'just' type 1. times new roman and arial are
typically distributed as ttf (nominally truetype); that's another
outline format.
>What I dont understand is that I do use Arial and Times New Roman in
>my tex files and every time I look at the fonts using Adobe Reader it
>is says that Arial and Times New Roman are type 1 fonts.
>
>Arial appears as "embed subset" while Times New Roman appears as "type
>1, actual font: TimesNewRoman-PSMT, actual font type: truetype" (what
>it means, I do not know).
embedded is good; i don't actually understand what the file is saying
about tnr, but i imagine that the file is created with the assumption
that a viewer will have tnr available. this is not reliable: tnr is
typically _not_ available on un*x-like systems.
>In conclusion, can I keep using these two fonts and still be sure they
>will not be rendered as type 3 by other users or have problems when
>printing?
there will (probability very close to 1) be no "type 3-like"
problems. however, there may be font substitution problems from that
use of tnr: without actually seeing a file, i can't be sure.
you don't say how you created the pdf file; without knowing that, it's
difficult to make any other recommendation.
--
Robin Fairbairns, Cambridge
>Arial appears as "embed subset" while Times New Roman appears as "type
>1, actual font: TimesNewRoman-PSMT, actual font type: truetype" (what
>it means, I do not know).
TNR PS MT was referenced when the file was made, but not embedded ---
whenviewing at that moment on that system, TNR in TrueType was used.
William
I have changed the Ghostscritp instructions to
-dPDFSETTINGS=/printer -dCompatibilityLevel=1.3 -dMaxSubsetPct=100
-dSubsetFonts=true -dEmbedAllFonts=true -sPAPERSIZE=a4 -dSAFER -dBATCH
-dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile="%bm.pdf" -c save pop -f
"%bm.ps"
and everything works fine.