How can one change the section title that \begin{thebibliography} ...
\end{thebibliography} produces from "References" to "Bibliography" when
using the article class?
\renewcommand\refname{Bibliography}
if you use babel then either place it after \begin{document} or use
\addto\captionsenglish{
\renewcommand\refname{Bibliography}
}
--
/daleif (remove RTFSIGNATURE from email address)
LaTeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
LaTeX book: http://www.imf.au.dk/system/latex/bog/ (in Danish)
Remember to post minimal examples, see URL below
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=minxampl
Did you try searching the FAQ?
> How can one change the section title that \begin{thebibliography} ...
> \end{thebibliography} produces from "References" to "Bibliography" when
> using the article class?
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fixnam
///Peter
Thank you very much for all the replies!!
\bibliographyname ???
Nope. You were right. I was replying in a hurry and from memory; and
my memory failed me badly. My apologies.
Luis.
In fact, the above command is wrong: extras are other stuff; I meant
to say
\addto\captions<yourlanguage>{\def\refname{Bibliography}}
Actually, I don't know if for this particular case is it the same to
say \def or \renewcommand... AFAIK, the latest \def overrides the
previous one, isn't it?
Apologies again,
Luis.
it does not matter wheter one uses \renew... or \def in this case.
Does any one know why the article class uses \refname and, say, book,
used \bibname?
hysterical raisins[*]. it was done that way when this mechanism was
introduced into latex 2.09 in ca.1992, and no-one complained then so
it's remained that way ever since, for compatibility purposes.
if one was starting again...
[*] aka historical reasons; it occurs to me this joke may not be
common away from my environment.
--
Robin Fairbairns, Cambridge
no problem, here.
I added a list of all the standard names controlled by babel and mentioned that
there is a difference between article and book-like classes.
I was just woundering
> Does any one know why the article class uses \refname and, say, book, used
> \bibname?
Because it is more typical for ariticles to have "References" and for
whole books to have "Bibliography". The commands \refname and
\bibname are support for language switching, and not general "hooks"
for document design, although they can be abused that way.
The expectation(*) was always that there is a documentstyle/class for
any particular journal or book project that uses the correct words
for titles.
(*) I'm surmising this.
--
Donald Arseneau as...@triumf.ca