I figured out quite a bad approximation of the average symbol with this
code:
$\not\!\circ \; x$
Any better ones?
Thanks in advance!
best regards
Moritz Beller
--
web http://www.4momo.de
mail momo dot beller at t-online dot de
gpgkey http://gpg.notlong.com
see if you can find anything in the symboles file on CTAN
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/symbols/comprehensive/
--
/daleif (remove RTFSIGNATURE from email address)
LaTeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
AMSMATH Intro: http://www.ams.org/tex/amslatex.html
LaTeX Intro: http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/lshort/lshort.pdf
Graphics Intro: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/epslatex.pdf
Superb Class: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/memoir.html
Remember to post minimal working examples.
> see if you can find anything in the symboles file on CTAN
>
> http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/symbols/comprehensive/
That's what I already tried unsuccessfully.
> I figured out quite a bad approximation of the average symbol with this
> code:
>
> $\not\!\circ \; x$
>
> Any better ones?
Try $\varnothing$ with \usepackage{amssymb} in the preamble?
Daniel
I've never encountered that notation before and am curious: Is
$\varnothing x$ just the arithmetic mean of x or does "average" mean
something different here? Is $\varnothing$ common in some particular
field of math/science/engineering? I normally see the average of x
typeset as $\overline x$.
-- Scott
> field of math/science/engineering? I normally see the average of x
> typeset as $\overline x$.
Or sometimes $\langle x\rangle$
Donald Arseneau as...@triumf.ca
> Scott Pakin <scot...@pakin.org> writes:
>
>> field of math/science/engineering? I normally see the average of x
>> typeset as $\overline x$.
>
> Or sometimes $\langle x\rangle$
>
In Germany you often find \diameter (e.g. from wasy) used for average
(Durchschnitt). Especially in non-technical/scientific papers. So AMS
\varnothing is OK.
Björn