Is this doable at all?
Also, is there a command to place things UNDER a "="-sign?
Not that i need it. Just being curious...
--
Kindly
Konrad
---------------------------------------------------
May all spammers die an agonizing death; have no burial places;
their souls be chased by demons in Gehenna from one room to
another for all eternity and more.
Sleep - thing used by ineffective people
as a substitute for coffee
Ambition - a poor excuse for not having
enough sense to be lazy
---------------------------------------------------
> Using the standard form doesn't let me place a multi-row
> text. I tried \stackrel{\textrm{a\\b}}{=} but that only made
> LaTeX grown angrily at me and ask me to buzz off.
>
> Is this doable at all?
Here's a way, which uses the amsmath package:
\stackrel{\begin{smallmatrix}\textrm{a}\\\textrm{b}\end{smallmatrix}}{=}
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
Smooth. A little bit cheating there but i guess everything is a nail
when you got nothing else but a hammer.
Thanks!
\[
\mathop = \limits^{df}
\]
\[
\mathop = \limits_{yoo - hoo!}
\]
--
Julian V. Noble
Professor Emeritus of Physics
j...@lessspamformother.virginia.edu
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/~jvn/
"Science knows only one commandment: contribute to science."
-- Bertolt Brecht, "Galileo".
>>\stackrel{\begin{smallmatrix}\textrm{a}\\\textrm{b}\end{smallmatrix}}{=}
>
>
> Smooth. A little bit cheating there but i guess everything is a nail
> when you got nothing else but a hammer.
Another solution, which does not require the \amsmath package, is
\stackrel{{\footnotesize\textrm{a}\atop\textrm{b}}}{=}
However, the bottom line gets too close to the = sign, at least for
my taste.