pdftk
BugBear
http://www.docu-track.com/home/prod_user/
--
Best Regards
John Verbeeten
Tracker Software Products
PDF-XChange & SDK, PDF-XChange Viewer;
PDF-Tools & SDK, Image-XChange SDK,
TIFF-XChange & SDK, Raster-XChange.
Email : jo...@docu-track.com
Support: http://www.docu-track.com/forum/index.php
Web site : http://www.docu-track.com
"bugbear" <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote in message
news:4512a1d2$0$3582$ed2e...@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
copy /b pdf.001 + pdf.002 + pdf.003 + pdf.004 + pdf.005 book.pdf
>copy /b pdf.001 + pdf.002 + pdf.003 + pdf.004 + pdf.005 book.pdf
Unless you have a very different copy command to me, this won't even
slightly work.
----------------------------------------
Aandi Inston qu...@dial.pipex.com http://www.quite.com
Please support usenet! Post replies and follow-ups, don't e-mail them.
The above copy command should work in any DOS/Windows OS.
I supposed, the files are split with a any split program like
http://www.freebyte.com/hjsplit/
To combine the files, the above copy command should be sufficient.
What doesn't work for you?
>Aandi Inston wrote:
>>
>> Herbert Kleebauer <kl...@unibwm.de> wrote:
>>
>> >copy /b pdf.001 + pdf.002 + pdf.003 + pdf.004 + pdf.005 book.pdf
>>
>> Unless you have a very different copy command to me, this won't even
>> slightly work.
>
>The above copy command should work in any DOS/Windows OS.
>I supposed, the files are split with a any split program like
>http://www.freebyte.com/hjsplit/
I think we are answering different questions. I do not know who of us
is right, so I will summarise, I hope correctly.
If the PDF files were split just into chunks, by a program like
hpsplit, they will not be valid PDF files, just pieces. The DOS copy
command can join them and should get back the original pieces.
However...
If the PDF book is in the form of separate PDF files, each of which is
a complete PDF, and can be viewed now, then the copy command will NOT
work. The poster would need a program designed to merge the contents
of multiple PDF files.
But then the names wouldn't be "pdf.001 .. pdf.005" but
"001.pdf .. 005.pdf".
You, sir, may be genius!
BugBear
Not exactly. There is no requirement for a PDF file to have the filename
extension ".pdf" (verified on this Windows workstation).
In addition, the OP did not specify whether or not each of the sections is a
valid PDF file; and furthermore, used different names for the sections in
the subject line and the body of his query.
Mr. Norton could help clear up this problem by simply staing whether or not
the sections are valid PDF files.
Cheers,
Bill Segraves