* In general, people who use them for desktop publishing said they were
the greatest thing on the market, and people who use(d) them for AI
applications think they stink. There were 2 Lisp developers who said
they "loved" the Xerox workstations, but the opposition was quite vocal.
* People who did like the workstations generally liked the development
environment and complained about lack of speed.
* One person (who has my sympathy!) had a long list of horror stories
about upgrades that never worked, paid-for SW that never arrived, etc.
* Several people expressed concern that the management doesn't know what
it's doing, at least as far as selling and supporting computers
* Several people mentioned that Xerox is starting to put its software
on the SPARC, and they thought that was a good idea (sigh...why doesn't
anybody but ME really like *APOLLOS*!!?!?!)
* A few Xerox employees wrote to say that Xerox is a good place to work.
* A couple of people cited "The Xerox Star: A Retrospective", Jeff Johnson et al,
IEEE Computer, Sept 1989. That turned out to be a VERY useful article.
Some sample quotes (names withheld, most people didn't want their names
mentioned)
>> Xerox workstations are, as far as I can tell, just about dead. At least
>> for AI applications; I suppose they still do okay in the word processing
>> market, though I expect Macs are giving them a hard row to hoe there, too.
>> The system is effortless to
>> use and to learn to use: we have trained ... people to use our Xerox
>> network as their primary office tool in an average of four hours of
>> classroom time each.
>> In summary, unless you are doing research at PARC or selling copiers, I would
>> suggest a really close look at Xerox, unless you thrive on frustration. I don't
>> think Xerox wants to sell computers. All the AI stuff from Envos is going over
>> to Sun platforms now, anyway. I don't bet on the demand staying around for
>> dedicated word processors either.
>> A number cruncher she ain't. As a publishing platform it lacks only speed.
>> The software however, is virtually idiot proof.
>> In terms of hardware reliability, they're not so great.
>> But the Xerox Interlisp environment is the best environment in the
>> world, bar none, when it comes to software development.
>> When putting your AI-glasses the 1186 is
>> called A Lisp-machine, otherwise it is a plain workstation. It has come to
>> age over the years and is no longer performance competitive, though.
SUMMARY --> I took the job, and so I soon have a first-hand perspective.
Thanks to all who responded, and especially to those who pointed me toward
the IEEE Computer article, that was really great.
mef
--
WARNING: Opinions in posting are farther away than they appear.
Lee Moore -- Xerox Webster Research Center -- +1 716 422 2496
UUCP: {allegra, cornell, decvax, rutgers}!rochester!rocksanne!lee
Arpa Internet: Moore....@Xerox.Com