I'm trying to evaluate the Gasper solution on a 25+ ATM network for my
small community bank. I'd like to get an objective opinion from experienced
Gasper customers before I talk to our ATM vendor about it. Thanks.
We use Gasper for our ATMs (about 500 of them), and are currently in the
process of moving our ATMs from a Unisys ATM to a NonStop/Tandem Base24
environment.
As far as I know, Gasper does not communicate with the ATMs at all. It
only talks to your host system (Mainframe / Tandem / etc). It will
interpret text messages sent to it by the host, and depending on the
message, can be set up to email, page, place in categories and whatnot.
Frankly (and this is a good time to remind everyone that I do not speak
for my employer, these are only my opinions - Also, I am not familiar
with every feature, add-on, or option available with the system), I am
not incredibly impressed by Gasper, although many people use it, and it
does the job.
As another poster put it, you have to weigh the benefit versus the cost.
Hope this helps...
--
Michael Acosta
Oops - Unisys mainframe, not ATM...
Dave
Michael Acosta wrote:
SNIP>>
...and this is a good time to remind everyone that I do not speak
> for my employer, these are only my opinions - Also, I am not familiar
> with every feature, add-on, or option available with the system)...
This is the product that was chosen by our internal clients - we just
have to run it.
Thank you very much for the offer, though.
In <mhqdnSfst4A...@comcast.com> Dave Bossi wrote:
> Now that's a great disclaimer! Welcome to the Tandem world.
>
> Dave
>
> Michael Acosta wrote:
> SNIP>>
> ....and this is a good time to remind everyone that I do not speak
Depending on the terminal type have you checked with vendors to see if
they'll provide monitoring ?
Some other monitoring frameworks offer ATM monitoring and ticketing,
but may also be out of your pocketbook.
We're a 500+ ATM shop and use Gasper heavily, works well, but be sure
to check the cost for size.
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:40:06 GMT, "Alan" <alanw...@nospam.com>
wrote: