@wbreidbach: Hi! It is still called ISPF & TSO. Both points to the same thing still. But there's an in-depth explanation about it - which I almost forgot. Something about how TSO is a kind of an utility inside ISPF.
And about the following comment,
> like excluding lines from view and limiting replacements only on (not) excluded lines.
Good point that. Exactly what I was trying to convey. I miss those on the tandem TEDIT interface. But still I accept that each environment has its own perks.
And "when found" is much similar to the "C ALL" command on TSO.
> I think most people only use a little fraction of the capabilities of TEDIT.
Again spot on. Tandem is actually blessed with a lot of powerful utilities which are long forgotten by most people who use it on a day to day basis. Only a handful of people are really "well versed" in these systems. I hope that changes. That's why I'll be going through the manual @Keith has suggested for TEDIT.
And about that compare program which you've written, I'll mail you from my personal ID as soon as I finish typing this comment out. Thanks! :) Always good to see people willing to help, most often than not in this group. And as always I'm eager to learn. :)
And @wbreidbach, about the below comment you posted:
> to compare type-101 files as well, it simply can use the linenumber as a sortcriteria, so it will find inserted, changed and deleted lines.
101 files only? And also "line number as sort criteria", what does that mean? Also you mean to say that it will pin point the exact lines which are inserted/changed/deleted in the corresponding files compared?
I'm guessing that the reply mail you send along with your compare TAL program will have a note or something of that sort which will explain on this doubt. But still, I just wanted to ask.
@keith: Wow, you amaze me time and again. This "QACOMP", I'll give it a try. But going by what you've just said, I'm guessing it is not in my system. I'll let you know after I try. This just adds to the list I mentioned in an other post in this group. These missing files are just a matter of double standards!? Ah. One standard version, or one package for all - would make life so much easier. In any platform, but that can't be the case. I understand.
And this "OSH" command I'll give it a try. And since you've mentioned that it is depending on how the user account is set up, I'm not going to add this to the above worry list of things. Ha! Hope at least this works.
And yes, I understand your point on why a better editing tool was not in place.
And that TEDIT manual, keith, I'll look into it.
> I seem to recall a different manual that was available in the past (many, many years ago) that did a better job of explaining the commands, but I do not see it in the manual set.
This 'different' manual which you seem to recall, would you be kind enough to pass it on to me if ever you have the fortune to find it? "better job of explaining the commands", already feels good to even think of such a manual's existence, ha!
@Randall: Hey randall, "non interactively" - what does this mean? I'm guessing that it means accessing the osh side of tandem from the Guardian interface itself? Without fully switching over to OSS?
And what does OSH expand to?
And what does that "-c" command imply? It is not in the command that @Keith mentioned?