Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Do I Still Need to Make Lucy Promiscuous?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
David M. Senseman
Jul 6, 1992, 11:59:31 PM7/6/92
to
We have 4 Indigos (XS-24's) in my lab - Lucy, Ricky, Ethel and Fred.
Because of very SLOW ethernet performance under 4.0.2, it was necessary to
force their ethernet chips into 'promiscuous' mode. Now that we
upgraded to 4.0.5, do we still have to force Lucy et al. to be
promiscuous? The release notes say nothing of either the ethernet
bug nor of it's fix that I could see. Thanks!
Because of very SLOW ethernet performance under 4.0.2, it was necessary to
force their ethernet chips into 'promiscuous' mode. Now that we
upgraded to 4.0.5, do we still have to force Lucy et al. to be
promiscuous? The release notes say nothing of either the ethernet
bug nor of it's fix that I could see. Thanks!
--
"Is this the party to | David M. Senseman (sens...@lonestar.utsa.edu)
whom I am speaking?" | Brain Research Laboratory
--Ernestine | The University of Texas at San Antonio
Bean Anderson
Jul 7, 1992, 1:05:50 PM7/7/92
to
Sorry, I don't know the answer to your question, but
congratulations on the most interesting subject line
I've seen in this group.
Bean
Paul Robins
Jul 7, 1992, 4:52:52 PM7/7/92
to
In article <1992Jul7.0...@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>, sens...@ricky.brainlab.utsa.edu (David M. Senseman) writes:
--
4.0.5 has fixed that problem.
Lucy can be celibate now. However what performance you gain in networking
will be lost in other more prosaic areas (which are not fit to be discussed
in this newsgroup).
--bubba
hakuna matata
390-1282 Mail stop 9U-510
0 new messages