Re: avm change when user increase
0xdeadabe
<aksa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 9, 10:26 am, moonhkt <moon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All
>> Do you know why avm change when the system start busy ?
>>
>> AIX 5.2
>>
>> Interval=2 , Count=20
>> 2008/05/09.08:41:27
>> System Configuration: lcpu=4 mem=7817MB
>> memory page
>> faults cpu
>> -------------- -------------------------------------
>> ---------------------- ------------
>> r b avm fre re pi po fr sr cy in
>> sy cs us sy id wa
>> 3 7 876477 416 0 16 121 686 3096006 113 1749 26024
>> 1321 33 36 6 25 1
>> 3 3 875936 1108 0 77 18 491 2913651 109 1719 15716
>> 1349 34 34 4 28 2
>> 5 5 876766 374 0 6 48 719 2504073 99 1745 37122
>> 1487 44 35 10 11 3
>> 4 6 876788 429 0 66 50 408 2975797 112 1663 18435
>> 1216 43 34 5 18 4
>> 3 4 876174 438 0 25 91 457 1946006 77 1713 23586
>> 1489 48 27 6 18 5
>> 4 3 876522 719 0 70 33 672 3005327 118 1791 21912
>> 1451 40 35 5 20 6
>> 3 2 876466 540 0 7 6 315 2212822 80 1662 39562
>> 1466 50 28 10 11 7
>> 8 2 877594 419 0 53 74 926 3641333 140 1886 17722
>> 1406 40 36 4 20 8
>> 3 4 876926 394 0 14 51 413 2613814 94 1753 18161
>> 1502 48 28 7 16 9
>> 6 4 878323 363 0 29 143 1063 3989671 146 1901 17651
>> 1310 42 38 5 15 10
>>
>> 2008/05/09.09:24:09
>> System Configuration: lcpu=4 mem=7817MB
>> memory page
>> faults cpu
>> -------------- -------------------------------------
>> ---------------------- ------------
>> r b avm fre re pi po fr sr cy in
>> sy cs us sy id wa
>> 4 2 1116095 392 0 16 49 760 4035686 158 2121 12058
>> 1542 25 41 4 29 1
>> 4 1 1116127 419 0 21 17 646 3493681 133 2160 10489
>> 1619 30 39 7 24 2
>> 5 3 1116692 292 0 5 13 567 3327126 127 2010 12337
>> 1372 41 39 6 14 3
>> 10 2 1117189 471 0 66 86 648 3760497 139 2158 52038
>> 1592 46 39 4 12 4
>> 6 2 1117143 384 0 22 35 416 3434173 130 2361 25130
>> 1873 51 34 4 11 5
>> 7 1 1116606 429 0 4 7 540 3097305 122 2417 27087
>> 2322 50 37 8 6 6
>> 13 3 1116606 377 0 8 16 486 4506655 168 2268 15808
>> 1466 47 37 5 11 7
>> 3 2 1116735 376 0 6 12 671 4385992 166 2408 16481
>> 1817 41 38 6 15 8
>> 3 3 1116774 406 0 8 12 643 2973357 112 2125 15117
>> 1739 32 29 14 25 9
>> 2 4 1116692 523 0 14 35 448 3172179 124 1972 9315
>> 1438 19 39 19 23 10
>
>AVM is active virtual memory and denotes the active pages used by
>processes at the moment the sample is collected. This is bound to
>increase with system usages as more processes are activated. This
>value does not include file pages.
>Point to note here is that if the value of avm multiplied by 4K is
>less than the system RAM, ideally no paging should be visible and it
>is perfect in your case and needs no further investigation.
>HTH
>Ashok Sangra
That sounds wrong to me. Are youz some kind of Indian?
moonhkt
No. those figure just for begining morning. We check why avm changing.
Our Progress Database may have problem about not enough RAM. We try to
rent 8GB for testing.
It is better than the pi and po less than 5 ?
Ashok Sangra
Hello Mr oxdeadabe,
In the first place, we are not here to discuss Nationalities. This is
a technical discussion forum which is of day-to-day use to many of us
and as members we should respect this.
In case you feel that I have presented something wrong, pls point it
out.
Ashok Sangra
0xdeadabe
Yes, youz are right!
<giggle>
>In case you feel that I have presented something wrong, pls point it
>out.
>Ashok Sangra
Are youz some kind of asshole?
0xdeadabe
wrote:
>Ok, I was going to ignore this clown, but now that people are starting
>to respond, I have to.
>
>First of all, the person who posted this is not me, but a person using
>my NG handle. He is an old timer at this, he used to use Anthony
>Mandic® in the comp.unix.solaris newsgroup years ago. I have only used
>2 handles over the past 3 years, "AIX n00b" and "0xdeadabe" I had old
>handles I used in comp.sys.ncr and CUS, but can't remember them. You
>will have to take a good look at the headers of the postings to be able
>to distinguish which one of us we are. We both use RoadRunner as an
>ISP, so that makes it even more difficult. He is located in the New
>York City area, and I am in northeast Ohio.
>
>He used to have some entertaining posts, but the sexually/racially
>charged stuff is over the top for me.
>
>Ashok, I apologize on behalf of my handle only, but it really wasn't me.
> Please take the time to look at the posts of the headers (and the
>content) to be able to tell. I was going to wait this one out, but
>since people are beginning to believe its really me, I can no longer do
>that.
How many more times are youz going to forge my email address?
ab...@rr.com advised.
<giggle>
0xdeadabe
wrote:
>Also, don't reply to all of the newsgroups he posts to. On of them seem
>to have a bot monitoring them.
Who are youz calling a bot, asshole?
BWAWAWAWAWAWAWAWA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!