On 2016-10-16 19:32, nospam wrote:
> In article <
tJKdnUlT9-lUZ57F...@giganews.com>, Alan Browne
> <
alan....@freelunchvideotron.ca> wrote:
>
>>>>> there is a *very* big difference between a container and the format
>>>>> that is contained.
>>>>
>>>> Which is still irrelevant to the current discussion and in any case, MS
>>>> define AVI as a "multimedia container format" so saying it either way is
>>>> little different except to pedants.
>>>
>>> it is not pedantic. you are wrong, you don't understand what it
>>> actually means and refuse to learn.
>>
>> Most of us know what a container is, but the distinction is not
>> generally relevant to most and in the current context, not at all. You
>> bringing it up to illustrate your general brilliance is nothing but that
>> and has impressed few if any.
>
> yes, most do know, except for you, who continues to argue.
All I said was the difference doesn't matter for the sake of the
subject. Had I not mentioned your pedantry over container/format the
fact that Perian lets me play avi's on my machine and its absence
prevent are really all that matters.
>>> nevertheless, for the benefit of other readers, avi and quicktime are
>>> containers which can *contain* pretty much anything, including mp3,
>>> aac, mpeg2, mpeg4, divx, wmv, wma and other *formats*.
>>>
>>> an avi that contains mpeg 4 does not need any additional codecs to play
>>> in quicktime, however, an avi that contains wmv does.
>>>
>>> that is *not* a pedantic difference.
Again, in the context of this thread, it doesn't make a difference at
all. Perian allows me to play avi's that won't play otherwise.
>>
>> In the current context (Perian needed or not) it has not shed an iota of
>> relevance to the discussion or solution. In the end I can watch every
>> variant of avi on my machine instantly with Perian installed whereas w/o
>> Perian I could not.
>
> actually you can't, because as i said, perian is not as good as
> flip4mac, which has microsoft's blessing. perian reverse engineered
> wmv/wma and while most will play, 'every variant of avi' certainly will
> not.
Every .avi on this machine plays perfectly or has been converted using
Handbrake to m4p.
>
>> The nature of avi (still described as a "multimedia container _format_)
>> being a container or a format is only of interest to the pedantic. If
>> this were a detailed rip-the-guts-out discussion of video/audio formats
>> then it would be relevant as a distinction here. But it is not at all.
>
> container format simply means the format of the container file, how it
> is laid out, not the format of the media within it. the distinction is
> *very* clear, except to you.
>
> as i said, an avi which contains mpeg4 does not need anything for
> quicktime to play, while one that contains wmv does.
Still irrelevant as I said: on my machines, with Perian: it works; w/o
it doesn't.
>
>>>>>> "As good"? Perian is completely transparent and immediate. As I recall
>>>>>> flip4mac there would be a long conversion delay before the video would
>>>>>> play. Dumped a long time ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> there's a setting to convert beforehand or convert on the fly, and with
>>>>> the latter, there is no delay. in other words, user error.
>>>>
>>>> Or the version I had back then (when MS "owned" the company that owned
>>>> F4M) did not have the on the fly capability.
>>>
>>> it did, you just had it set wrong.
See below.
>>
>> Back then it was frustrating to use, so I looked at all the preferences
>> and there was nothing for real time decoding. It converted, then
>> played. Note that the copy of F4M that I had dated from my prior Mac
>> and even then it been on there for several years.
>
> i've been using flip4mac since before microsoft supported it (back when
> microsoft had their own wmv codec) and i can't remember a single time
> where that option was not there.
So you say. I don't recall any such feature. And it is something I
would have looked for.
Was that a "pro" (paid for) feature?
Could be. All I remember is always waiting on it. Or was it a "pro"
feature that I would have had to pay for?