Attention Lurkers. Both individuals and groups who have observed but
not posted, you have been identified.
Some of you are engaged in an illegal activity or activities. You will
be taken into custody at a proper time. You are under watch. You will
not escape. Some few of you will be offered lucrative positions. Most
of you will continue as you have been.
Attention Posters. One of you is a two time murderer and a suspect in
several other homicides. You were not successful in hiding your crimes.
You have been identified. You will be taken into custody at a proper
time. You are under watch. You will not escape.
Attention Posters. Some few of you will be taken into custody and
prosecuted for your crimes at a proper time. Some few of you will be
offered lucrative positions. Most of you will continue as you have been.
Attention All. Many of you have been interviewed. The stranger in the
supermarket. The woman who asked for directions. The girl walking her
dogs. The Mailman. A telemarketer. The clerk in the bank. Your
neighbor. The inattentive driver who bumped your car. Your gardener, a
close relative. We could be anyone, anywhere.
You have been informed so that we might judge your reactions and actions.
We thank you for your cooperation.
Hmm, zara? Not the usual groups, however. And not enough misspellings and
grammar errors.
> Attention Lurkers. Both individuals and groups who have observed but
> not posted, you have been identified.
Oh shit. Guess I will have to retrieve the fake ID and jump on the first
plane to South America. They will never take me alive. Bwahahaha!
Ian
--
Ian Gregory
http://www.zenatode.org.uk/ian/
Oh no! My cousin, who lives next door, owns dogs, delivers letters,
bumped my car, pruned a tree for me and called me to sell me some
products is an informer? This is terrible! At least she doesn't work
at a bank. I can sleep soundly tonight.
Tom Lake
Just what we need here, another mental case!
And we thought muah was enough...
--
Mike
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Do you feel that he's threatening your position, George?
They're crawling out of the woodwork! Oh, yes, and Muah is MORE than enough!
My intelligence files on you indicate that you are a fucking rookie.
You will ceast and desist from coopting our agenda like some fucking
wannabe.
Nor am I in need of your services or youe 'assistance'. Your
persistance in this course of behavior will only result in a 'visit'
from our agent "Gary 7". Trust me, he and I both have very *looong*
memories. A log of your activities is being maintained...
Flint
On 11/15/09 11:09 AM, in article UAWLm.32330$Wd1....@newsfe15.iad,
"Citizen Rob" <CB22...@OrangeGrove.org> wrote:
Just which of the groups are you referring in this cross-posting bullshit?!?
Fa Groon is GG?
How do you know that he is George?
--
"It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument."
William G. McAdoo.
American Government official (1863-1941).
I don't think so. Fagroon has disclosed the fact that he is a
socialist... something that George is dead set against.
When has Clyde ever required actual knowledge to say something?
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
<http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg>
I have some major gas.
I'm at the library researching some tax law, and I just let one go in
the stacks. Completely silent. I took the book I needed back to a
desk, and a professor went into the same general area, he made a funny
face and left.
It was an easy 9.5 on the rankness scale.
I'm not a Socialist. Strictly speaking, I'm a dedicated Marxist. While
Socialism is a cornerstone of Marxist collectivism, Marxism goes much further
than that. The world is starting to come around to the position that true
Marxism is society's only way forward.
How much chutzpah does it take for Alan 'too many times to count'
Baker to post such a thing?
LOL! George posted that he thought the government should use its guns
to force companies to make products for 'the common good', whatever
that is.
That's nothing but Marxist.
George gave a lot of lip service to conservatism but when you nailed
him down he always spewed leftwing crap.
Like I said many a'time George thought he was a right winger because,
even though he was actually a middling leftie, his neighbors in the
Bay area were hard core Communist revolutionaries.
"I'm not a Socialist". He wasn't speaking to you.
--
Wes Groleau
Guidelines for judging others:
1. Don't attribute to malice that which
can be adequately explained by stupidity.
2. Don't attribute to stupidity that which
can be adequately explained by ignorance.
3. Don't attribute to ignorance that which
can be adequately explained by misunderstanding.
I thought you might have had old headers that you remembered that
matches Fagroons headers.
It is the only way I could ever tell.
I realise this might surprise you but headers are easily spoofed. It's
why people think Willy Poaster is so funny.
For once an for all, I am NOT this George Graves person. Before I came here,
back in May, I had never heard of this guy, yet people keep accusing me of
being him. What I have gathered from people here, this guy was a
right-winger, I'm not. In fact, the only thing that I see that we have in
common is that we both are Mac advocates. Using Google, I see no posts on
Usenet for a George Graves since 2007. How do you know this guy's not dead?
Quite true, as headers can be spoofed, but George never went to that
trouble and I doubt
that Fagroon has went to that trouble either.
You are the living proof.
I don't know why the guy is whining like a bitch on the rag. He constantly
accuses others of being sock puppets, and now that the shoe is on the other
foot, he complains. What a fucking mutt.
> I don't know why the guy is whining like a bitch on the rag. He constantly
> accuses others of being sock puppets, and now that the shoe is on the other
> foot, he complains. What a fucking mutt.
>
That's not irony; most people in the group are not using more than one
nick.
Take it as a lesson in proper usage: if you post using only one name,
you're doing better than anyone using many.
You also have a much greater chance of being right once or twice.
Not that Wincent will ever try to be right.
You seem to have an interesting collection.
> Take it as a lesson in proper usage: if you post using only one name,
> you're doing better than anyone using many.
> You also have a much greater chance of being right once or twice.
> Not that Wincent will ever try to be right.
Less that 4% world market share.
Less reliable than Asus, Toshiba, Sony.
Oompa-loompa virus.