Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Macbook Pro 2012 15": What is the value of its design capacity?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Jolly Roger
Jan 1, 2013, 1:30:50 PM1/1/13
to
In article <XnsA13BAD14...@212.27.60.40>,
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook Pro 2012
> 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> Thank you.
So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook Pro 2012
> 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> Thank you.
So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
Message has been deleted
Jolly Roger
Jan 1, 2013, 1:37:52 PM1/1/13
to
In article <XnsA13BC6F9...@212.27.60.40>,
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote in
> news:jollyroger-83246...@news.individual.net:
> Jacobert
It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get from
Apple.
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote in
> news:jollyroger-83246...@news.individual.net:
>
> > In article <XnsA13BAD14...@212.27.60.40>,
> > Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook Pro
> >> 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> >> Thank you.
> >
> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
>
> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> > In article <XnsA13BAD14...@212.27.60.40>,
> > Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook Pro
> >> 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> >> Thank you.
> >
> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
>
> Jacobert
It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get from
Apple.
Message has been deleted
Jolly Roger
Jan 1, 2013, 5:43:44 PM1/1/13
to
In article <XnsA13BCD4D...@212.27.60.40>,
> A230CF.103...@news.individual.net:
> Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
>
> Jacobert
Why does it matter to you, as long as it works correctly?
> A230CF.103...@news.individual.net:
>
> > In article <XnsA13BC6F9...@212.27.60.40>,
> > Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote in
> >> news:jollyroger-83246...@news.individual.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <XnsA13BAD14...@212.27.60.40>,
> >> > Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook
> Pro
> >> >> 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> >> >> Thank you.
> >> >
> >> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
> >>
> >> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> >> Jacobert
> >
> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get from
> > Apple.
>
> But it is not the design capacity which estimated in maH. (I found with
> > In article <XnsA13BC6F9...@212.27.60.40>,
> > Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote in
> >> news:jollyroger-83246...@news.individual.net:
> >>
> >> > In article <XnsA13BAD14...@212.27.60.40>,
> >> > Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook
> Pro
> >> >> 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> >> >> Thank you.
> >> >
> >> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
> >>
> >> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> >> Jacobert
> >
> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get from
> > Apple.
>
> Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
>
> Jacobert
Why does it matter to you, as long as it works correctly?
Message has been deleted
Jolly Roger
Jan 2, 2013, 4:53:36 PM1/2/13
to
In article <XnsA13CE200...@212.27.60.39>,
> Jacobert
What is the ACTUAL PROBLEM here?
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook
> >> Pro
> >> >> >> 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> >> >> >> Thank you.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> >> >> Jacobert
> >> >
> >> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get
> from Apple.
> >>
> >> But it is not the design capacity which estimated in maH. (I found
> with Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
> >>
> >> Jacobert
> >
> > Why does it matter to you, as long as it works correctly?
>
> Therefore my question about the design capacity for Macbook Pro 2012 15".
> >> >> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook
> >> Pro
> >> >> >> 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> >> >> >> Thank you.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> >> >> Jacobert
> >> >
> >> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get
> from Apple.
> >>
> >> But it is not the design capacity which estimated in maH. (I found
> with Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
> >>
> >> Jacobert
> >
> > Why does it matter to you, as long as it works correctly?
>
> Jacobert
What is the ACTUAL PROBLEM here?
Fred McKenzie
Jan 2, 2013, 6:57:06 PM1/2/13
to
> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get from
> > Apple.
>
> > Apple.
>
> But it is not the design capacity which estimated in maH. (I found with
> Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
Jacobert-
> Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
I think that is your answer. Divide 77.5 Watt Hours by 10.95 Volts to
get 7.07762557 Ampere Hours, or 7077.62557 maH.
Fred
nospam
Jan 2, 2013, 11:31:34 PM1/2/13
to
In article <jollyroger-483CD...@news.individual.net>,
Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
> > >> >> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook
> > >> >> >> Pro 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> > >> >> >> Thank you.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> > >> >> Jacobert
> > >> >
> > >> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get
> > >> > from Apple.
> > >>
> > >> But it is not the design capacity which estimated in maH. (I found
> > with Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
> > >>
> > >> Jacobert
> > >
> > > Why does it matter to you, as long as it works correctly?
> >
> > Therefore my question about the design capacity for Macbook Pro 2012 15".
> > Jacobert
>
> What is the ACTUAL PROBLEM here?
he wants to know the mah rating of the battery. that's what.
> > >> >> >> I would like to know how many mAH is listed a battery of Macbook
> > >> >> >> Pro 2012 15" Without Retina display? (Well, "design capacity")
> > >> >> >> Thank you.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > So go look on Apple's web site like the rest of us.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks, but already done, unsuccessfully. (only cycles mentionned)
> > >> >> Jacobert
> > >> >
> > >> > It's 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. That's probably all you're going to get
> > >> > from Apple.
> > >>
> > >> But it is not the design capacity which estimated in maH. (I found
> > with Google the D.C. only for the MBPr)
> > >>
> > >> Jacobert
> > >
> > > Why does it matter to you, as long as it works correctly?
> >
> > Therefore my question about the design capacity for Macbook Pro 2012 15".
> > Jacobert
>
> What is the ACTUAL PROBLEM here?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Fred McKenzie
Jan 4, 2013, 12:44:14 AM1/4/13
to
In article <XnsA13DE2D7...@212.27.60.37>,
Jacobert-
As JR stated, that is probably the best you will be able to get from
Apple. I suspect they calculated 77.5 Wh by multiplying mAH by 10.95,
dividing by 1000 and rounding off.
Different laptops often use batteries with different voltages and have
different operating currents. Therefore Watt Hours are probably more
useful for comparing battery charge life. If you can find how much
power a given laptop uses, you can approximate its battery charge life
by dividing the battery's Watt Hours by the laptop's power requirement.
Fred
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > Jacobert-
> >
> > I think that is your answer. Divide 77.5 Watt Hours by 10.95 Volts to
> > get 7.07762557 Ampere Hours, or 7077.62557 maH.
> >
> > Fred
>
> Thanks for your answer, Fred. I hope it is the right answer.
> > Jacobert-
> >
> > I think that is your answer. Divide 77.5 Watt Hours by 10.95 Volts to
> > get 7.07762557 Ampere Hours, or 7077.62557 maH.
> >
> > Fred
>
Jacobert-
As JR stated, that is probably the best you will be able to get from
Apple. I suspect they calculated 77.5 Wh by multiplying mAH by 10.95,
dividing by 1000 and rounding off.
Different laptops often use batteries with different voltages and have
different operating currents. Therefore Watt Hours are probably more
useful for comparing battery charge life. If you can find how much
power a given laptop uses, you can approximate its battery charge life
by dividing the battery's Watt Hours by the laptop's power requirement.
Fred
Message has been deleted
Jolly Roger
Jan 6, 2013, 12:42:31 PM1/6/13
to
In article <XnsA13FC89E...@212.27.60.40>,
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Fred McKenzie <fm...@aol.com> wrote in
> news:fmmck-645F3A....@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com:
> Thanks Fred, I call Apple but they do not have the information. However,
> I read your indications on a battery on the website "FixIt".
>
> The most important thing is the indication of Coconut is false: it is
> written:6900 mAh.
> Jacobert
None of this means much.
Jacobert <em...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Fred McKenzie <fm...@aol.com> wrote in
> news:fmmck-645F3A....@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com:
> I read your indications on a battery on the website "FixIt".
>
> The most important thing is the indication of Coconut is false: it is
> written:6900 mAh.
> Jacobert
None of this means much.
0 new messages