Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

C++ Style at Kuro5hin

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Michael D. Crawford

unread,
May 11, 2002, 12:01:33 AM5/11/02
to
My article "Musings on Good C++ Style" is featured at the community website
http://www.kuro5hin.org/ The full article is at:

http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/5/9/205040/3918

It discusses reducing build dependencies, choices for storage and representation
of data, and some apparently controversial practices I use for performance
tuning (studying the assembly output from compiling one's code).

K5 is a rather good community site that covers a wide range of topics, not just
programming. It's more intelligent than some of the communities I've
participated in, although it does have its trolls.

Sadly, many of the responses to my article are from people who dislike C++. It
would be nice if more people who actually used the language were to participate
in the discussion.

Mike
--
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
http://www.goingware.com/
craw...@goingware.com

Subscribe to the GoingWare Newsletter at http://www.goingware.com/newsletter/

Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.

Miro Jurisic

unread,
May 11, 2002, 4:18:59 AM5/11/02
to
In article <3CDC97F6...@goingware.com>,

"Michael D. Crawford" <craw...@goingware.com> wrote:

> My article "Musings on Good C++ Style" is featured at the community
> website http://www.kuro5hin.org/ The full article is at:
>
> http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/5/9/205040/3918
>
> It discusses reducing build dependencies, choices for storage and
> representation of data, and some apparently controversial practices I
> use for performance tuning (studying the assembly output from
> compiling one's code).
>
> K5 is a rather good community site that covers a wide range of
> topics, not just programming. It's more intelligent than some of the
> communities I've participated in, although it does have its trolls.
>
> Sadly, many of the responses to my article are from people who
> dislike C++. It would be nice if more people who actually used the
> language were to participate in the discussion.

As a person who uses the language, I see no point in expending energy on
most people who replied to your article. I agree with you, but I really
don't see what good it's going to do to add to a language religious war.

meeroh

Michael D. Crawford

unread,
May 11, 2002, 6:47:17 PM5/11/02
to
I agree with you that we shouldn't feed the trolls.

Rather what I hoped was that people would join and discuss the finer points of
C++, or ask questions.

Mike

Miro Jurisic wrote:
> In article <3CDC97F6...@goingware.com>,

> As a person who uses the language, I see no point in expending energy on
> most people who replied to your article. I agree with you, but I really
> don't see what good it's going to do to add to a language religious war.
>
> meeroh

--

Miro Jurisic

unread,
May 11, 2002, 10:32:04 PM5/11/02
to
In article <3CDD9FDA...@goingware.com>,

"Michael D. Crawford" <craw...@goingware.com> wrote:

> I agree with you that we shouldn't feed the trolls.
>
> Rather what I hoped was that people would join and discuss the finer
> points of C++, or ask questions.

In a forum in which your message generate 80+% of troll responses, I
doubt that it's possible to have a conversation about that with a
reasonable signal/noise ratio. Just my opinion, of course.

meeroh

0 new messages