Claris Emailer isnt working anymore?
Theo
--
Try out Email Cleaner for Macintosh, it cleans up Emails and NewsGroup posts,
from a badly wrapped mess into neatly wrapped text. And all from one button
click in a small window that Email Cleaner gives you, that floats over all of
your programs. It is "neat and intergrated". It is useful for heavy Email and
NewsGroup users.
Frank Nospam
> Where can I find an update to Claris Emailer?
Nowhere. There is no such update. It has not been supported for years.
Alternate answer: http://www.eudora.com
-F
.
Theo
> Theo <del...@softhome.nyet> wrote:
>> Where can I find an update to Claris Emailer?
> Nowhere. There is no such update. It has not been supported for years.
Well, I was using it until yesterday. Then it expired. it is version 2.0
Michael Dines
> Theo <del...@softhome.nyet> wrote:
> > Where can I find an update to Claris Emailer?
>
> Nowhere. There is no such update. It has not been supported for years.
>
How odd that they should be available from the Apple site then. Can't
remember the link, I think you can find it through Fogcity.com
Matt Broughton
For a full list of Claris Emailer files on the Apple site go to:
http://asu.info.apple.com/swupdates.nsf/264eb185562a53f2862567ed00685a00?Crea
teDocument
For the Claris Emailer udater from version 2.0 to 2.0v3, go directly to:
http://asu.info.apple.com/swupdates.nsf/artnum/n10219
Claris Emailer 2.0v3 is the last version. Still works great. Best e-mail
app there is.
Matt Broughton
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Cadimus
> Where can I find an update to Claris Emailer?
Emailer aren't supported anymore since Claris became Filemaker and all
other Claris products went over to Apple. At best, updaters to 2.0v3 is
available since no official version beyond 2.0v3 exists. I can email
them if you need it.
--
Email address *is* valid.
PayPal is free to use. For a limited time, you can get a $5 bonus for
signing up & additional $5 for each referals. Please use the link below:
https://secure.paypal.com/refer/pal=cadimus%40tds.net
Theo
> Theo <del...@softhome.nyet> wrote:
>> Where can I find an update to Claris Emailer?
> Emailer aren't supported anymore since Claris became Filemaker and all
> other Claris products went over to Apple. At best, updaters to 2.0v3 is
> available since no official version beyond 2.0v3 exists. I can email
> them if you need it.
Well. I tried re-installing it, then copying all the data files back.
That worked. But I'll have to do this every 30 days.
Theo
<mbro...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>For a full list of Claris Emailer files on the Apple site go to:
>http://asu.info.apple.com/swupdates.nsf/264eb185562a53f2862567ed00685a00?Crea
>teDocument
"(do not bookmark this page, it will change)" it says. When I went I
saw a list of Extensions.
>For the Claris Emailer udater from version 2.0 to 2.0v3, go directly to:
>http://asu.info.apple.com/swupdates.nsf/artnum/n10219
Thanks.
Cadimus
> Well. I tried re-installing it, then copying all the data files back.
> That worked. But I'll have to do this every 30 days.
That shouldn't be right. I still use Emailer because it's the only one
that can collect AOL emails. And I don't need to reinstall every 30
days.
Have you tried holding down certain keys on starting up Claris Emailer
to force complete rebuilding of all email data? I believe it's
control-option but I could be wrong.
Michael Dines
> Theo <del...@softhome.nyet> wrote:
>
> > Well. I tried re-installing it, then copying all the data files back.
> > That worked. But I'll have to do this every 30 days.
>
> That shouldn't be right. I still use Emailer because it's the only one
> that can collect AOL emails. And I don't need to reinstall every 30
> days.
>
I assume every thirty days because it's a demo copy? If you can't buy a
full copy sometimes just trashing a specific Prefs file reawakes a demo.
Don't know which one you should Trash though, might even be an invisible
(doesn't sound like it if reinstalling gets Emailer going again.)
John D. Newsome
expires every 30 days. You cannot download the full , non-expiring version
anywhere on the net that I know of. You have to buy a hard copy that came
in the box. I did, about 2 years ago, but they are VERY scarce now. Best
places to look would be a classifieds site, an auction site, or post a
message in the Mac newsgroups asking if anyone has a hard copy they want to
sell. You can continue to trash the demo and reinstall every 30 days.
There's no limit that I know of to how many times you can do that. You can
also look around for the free version of Claris E-mailer 1.1. It's similar
to 2.0, but doesn't quite have all of the bells & whistles.
FWIW, I never really understood everyone's fascination with Claris E-mailer.
It was a good program in its day, and I tried to use it, but it continuously
crashed my PowerMac at work. I tried and tried to resolve the problem, but
never did. I KNOW I'll get flamed for this, but to me Outlook Express is
the best e-mail program money *can't* buy! I use OE 5.0.2, and it is
flawless. I even use it to check my Hotmail accounts. If you don't have
the latest, fastest Mac, OE 4.5 is just as good in my book. I've got
Eudora. I BOUGHT a copy of Eudora Pro in the box, and have upgraded it
every time they post a final upgrade. It just doesn't get the job done - it
just seems "quirky" to me. I receive some HTML messages every day, and,
while Eudora will display them, they aren't formatted right.
Yes, I KNOW Bill Gates & Microsoft are evil... yes, I know we are supposed
to hate them if we love the Mac... but a good program is a good program.
And the price is sure right!
Who says that? I say that... John D. Newsome, on the John Boy & Billy Show.
P.S. If anyone is interested in buying my hard copy of E-mailer 2.0v3,
e-mail me at nu...@hotmail.com and we'll talk. It's just collecting dust on
my shelf.
----------
In article <1eavks6.1s9...@usr55-cro.cableinet.co.uk>,
John C. Baker
> You can
> also look around for the free version of Claris E-mailer 1.1. It's similar
> to 2.0, but doesn't quite have all of the bells & whistles.
No, no, no, no, no. Claris E-Mailer 1.1 has the dreaded Y1.999K bug. All
downloaded mail dates, since 1-1-99, are hopelessly screwed up. Unless you
don't care what dates are on your e-mail, 1.1 is not an option.
If you want to stay with Claris E-mailer, you can download the full
version of 2.0 through a link at www.macemail.com. You'll have to pay
about $30 for it, though. Otherwise, check out...
> I KNOW I'll get flamed for this, but to me Outlook Express is
> the best e-mail program money *can't* buy! I use OE 5.0.2, and it is
> flawless. I even use it to check my Hotmail accounts.
I switched to Outlook Express 5 in November, when I got tired of using Res
Edit to change all my E-mailer dates. It works great, and can convert
E-Mailer 2 files into an Outlook Express files almost flawlessly. Every
once in a while, Microsoft does something right.
--
John C. Baker; jc...@humboldt.edu; AOL IM: jcbaker10
San Mateo, CA, USA € N 37'31.974, W 122'17.435
http://www.humboldt.edu/~jcb10/
SETI@Home: 613 units, 5442 hours
Cadimus
> I switched to Outlook Express 5 in November, when I got tired of using Res
> Edit to change all my E-mailer dates.
Were you using Emailer 1.x? If you were using 2.x then something wasn't
right with yours since my Emailer 2.0v3 always displayed the right date
(except when downloading from AOL, it goes to 194-something)
Adam Bailey
The AOL issue was fixed months ago.
--
Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois
ad...@lull.org | Finger/Web for PGP
ada...@aol.com | http://www.lull.org/adam/
John C. Baker
DoNo...@mac.com (Cadimus) wrote:
> John C. Baker <jc...@axe.humboldt.edu> wrote:
>
> > I switched to Outlook Express 5 in November, when I got tired of using Res
> > Edit to change all my E-mailer dates.
>
> Were you using Emailer 1.x? If you were using 2.x then something wasn't
> right with yours
No, I was indeed using 1.X. When the issue of changing dates became
unbearable, I decided to change. I figured I could download 2.x for $30,
try to find it second hand and pay who knows what, or go with OE 5 for
free. I chose the later.
John D. Newsome
Claris E-mailer, you might want to check out PowerMail 3.0 at:
It looks and acts just like Claris E-mailer 2.0v3 in my limited experience
with it. Just my .02.
John Newsome
> From: Theo <del...@softhome.nyet>
> Organization: Theo
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 01:41:11 +0000
> Subject: Claris Emailer isnt working anymore?
>
> Where can I find an update to Claris Emailer?
>
Mike Hutchison
> That's exactly what it is. He's got a demo copy of Claris E-mailer that
> expires every 30 days. You cannot download the full , non-expiring version
> anywhere on the net that I know of. You have to buy a hard copy that came
> in the box. I did, about 2 years ago, but they are VERY scarce now. Best
> places to look would be a classifieds site, an auction site, or post a
> message in the Mac newsgroups asking if anyone has a hard copy they want to
> sell. You can continue to trash the demo and reinstall every 30 days.
> There's no limit that I know of to how many times you can do that. You can
> also look around for the free version of Claris E-mailer 1.1. It's similar
> to 2.0, but doesn't quite have all of the bells & whistles.
>
> FWIW, I never really understood everyone's fascination with Claris E-mailer.
> It was a good program in its day, and I tried to use it, but it continuously
> crashed my PowerMac at work. I tried and tried to resolve the problem, but
> never did. I KNOW I'll get flamed for this, but to me Outlook Express is
I'm NOT gonna flame you, instead I want to congratulate you for choosing a
decent program, even if it does originate from the pits of hell.
> the best e-mail program money *can't* buy! I use OE 5.0.2, and it is
> flawless. I even use it to check my Hotmail accounts. If you don't have
> the latest, fastest Mac, OE 4.5 is just as good in my book. I've got
> Eudora. I BOUGHT a copy of Eudora Pro in the box, and have upgraded it
> every time they post a final upgrade. It just doesn't get the job done - it
> just seems "quirky" to me. I receive some HTML messages every day, and,
> while Eudora will display them, they aren't formatted right.
>
> Yes, I KNOW Bill Gates & Microsoft are evil... yes, I know we are supposed
> to hate them if we love the Mac... but a good program is a good program.
> And the price is sure right!
I agree whole heartedly.
It's good to see we're not all blinded to Micro$ofts evil empire building.
[This message was written in OE.]
--
Regards,
Mike Hutchison
[replace "ANTISPAM" with "blizzard" to reply personally]
Pat Caudill
(in message <B552E5DC.5610%new...@iname.com>):
>
> If you're interested in a program that seems to me to be an almost clone of
> Claris E-mailer, you might want to check out PowerMail 3.0 at:
>
> https://www.ctmdev.com/
>
> It looks and acts just like Claris E-mailer 2.0v3 in my limited experience
> with it. Just my .02.
The May 8, 2000 TidBits ahd a review of PowerMail and a migration to it.
Pat Caudill
Perry Noyd
It runs on a small RAM footprint and works quite well. It doesn't have
all the bells and whistles of the newer programs but it's stable on a G3
running Mac OS 8.6
Not sure where you can find it but I think it was availble once on one
of the MacAddict CDs.
Cheers,
Perry
Tim Lapin
wholeheartedly. I have just moved my Emailer 2.0v3 setup to my G4
running OS 9.0.4. It was a flawless migration.
My only gripe is that a program with so much potential and room for easy
growth was killed before its prime.
In article <8fvf28$hvp$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Matt Broughton
<mbro...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>Claris Emailer 2.0v3 is the last version. Still works great. Best e-mail
>app there is.
>
>Matt Broughton
>
--
Tim Lapin (at home)
mail: mailto:ti...@vax2.concordia.ca
web: http://alcor.concordia.ca/~timl
John D. Newsome
the incoming messages were mangled. There are patches out there that "fix"
the date I think. (I say fix with quotation marks because if I remember
right, the patch I saw only fixed archived messages, and not the ones in
your inbox.) If you can live with the glitch it's still a viable program,
but to my knowledge, no one has figured out what causes the problem or if
it's fixable.
As to finding it? Both versions are getting more and more rare on the
internet as time goes on. I believe most reputable sites pulled version 1
when the 1999 bug became apparent. I don't think you can download a full
version of 2.0 anywhere on the internet.
Perry Noyd
> Version 1.0 has the 1999 bug in it. Starting in 1999 all of the dates of
> the incoming messages were mangled. There are patches out there that "fix"
> the date I think. (I say fix with quotation marks because if I remember
> right, the patch I saw only fixed archived messages, and not the ones in
> your inbox.) If you can live with the glitch it's still a viable program,
> but to my knowledge, no one has figured out what causes the problem or if
> it's fixable.
You are correct... there is a fix.
Preferences>Defaults tab>UNCHECK senders date/time for received mail
Makes an elegant and simple program viable once again.
> As to finding it? Both versions are getting more and more rare on the
> internet as time goes on. I believe most reputable sites pulled version 1
> when the 1999 bug became apparent. I don't think you can download a full
> version of 2.0 anywhere on the internet.
I agree... and there are other excellent e-mail programs available but
the fact of the matter is that the original message was asking whether
or not Claris Emailer still worked.
The answer is... yes... quite well despite the fact that it's difficult
to find and no longer supported by Apple.
Cheers,
:Perry
Zelda Queen of the Night
I found an LC III in a dumpster that I am rehabbing for a friend. Can I run
OS 8.1 on it? It has 36MB Ram. The reason I'd like to have it running 8.1 is
so I can put Timbuctu on it in case she needs remote support. She lives 2
hours away over mountains.
thanks
Miranda
Geof Gonter
DoNo...@mac.com (Cadimus) wrote:
> Good luck!!! OS 8.1 and above all requires PowerPC. And IIRC LCIII
> won't work under OS 8.0 either since 8.0 needs a minimum of '040
Funny, Mac OS 8.1 works just fine on my Quadra 840A and my daughter's
Quadra 650. You are right though, 8.x will not run on a 68040 Macintosh.
Zelda Queen of the Night
----------
In article <ggonter-2DD2F4...@news.landmarknet.net>, Geof Gonter
<ggo...@landmarknet.net> wrote:
well I just wondered. According to AppleSpec the farthest I can go is 7.6.1
but I have known them to be wrong. Perhaps I'll just try it and see what
happens.
thanks all
Miranda
Paul McGrane
> Good luck!!! OS 8.1 and above all requires PowerPC. And IIRC LCIII
> won't work under OS 8.0 either since 8.0 needs a minimum of '040
8.1 still works on 68040s. It's 8.5 and higher that require a Power
Mac.
Anyway, according to Apple, an LCIII can run 7.6.1. You might consider
7.5.5 anyway since it's only a little older and can be downloaded for
free (download 7.5.3 and then the 7.5.5 update).
--
...Paul McGrane
Matt Broughton
"Zelda Queen of the Night" <mirand...@valley.net> wrote:
>
> I found an LC III in a dumpster that I am rehabbing for a friend. Can I run
> OS 8.1 on it? It has 36MB Ram. The reason I'd like to have it running 8.1 is
> so I can put Timbuctu on it in case she needs remote support. She lives 2
> hours away over mountains.
> Miranda
>
No. The highest OS you can use is System 7.5.5.
Cadimus
> I found an LC III in a dumpster that I am rehabbing for a friend. Can I run
> OS 8.1 on it? It has 36MB Ram. The reason I'd like to have it running 8.1 is
> so I can put Timbuctu on it in case she needs remote support. She lives 2
> hours away over mountains.
Good luck!!! OS 8.1 and above all requires PowerPC. And IIRC LCIII
won't work under OS 8.0 either since 8.0 needs a minimum of '040
--
Email address *is* valid.
Phyllis Evans
<mbro...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> > I found an LC III in a dumpster that I am rehabbing for a friend. Can I
> > run
> > OS 8.1 on it? It has 36MB Ram. The reason I'd like to have it running
> > 8.1 is
> > so I can put Timbuctu on it in case she needs remote support. She lives
> > 2
> > hours away over mountains.
> > thanks
> > Miranda
> >
> No. The highest OS you can use is System 7.5.5.
Correction - The LC III has an '030 processor and can run 7.6.1 with
ease. I'm running it on a Duo 230.
Cadimus
> Funny, Mac OS 8.1 works just fine on my Quadra 840A and my daughter's
> Quadra 650. You are right though, 8.x will not run on a 68040 Macintosh.
I think I'm seeing a crossed wires somewhere. Quadra 650 and 840av are
both 68040 based Macs. You're sure it's a 8.1 and not 8.0?
Grace Palazzolo
> Zelda Queen of the Night <mirand...@valley.net> wrote:
>
> > I found an LC III in a dumpster that I am rehabbing for a friend. Can I
> > run
> > OS 8.1 on it? It has 36MB Ram. The reason I'd like to have it running
> > 8.1 is
> > so I can put Timbuctu on it in case she needs remote support. She lives
> > 2
> > hours away over mountains.
>
> Good luck!!! OS 8.1 and above all requires PowerPC. And IIRC LCIII
> won't work under OS 8.0 either since 8.0 needs a minimum of '040
Actually, that's OS 8.5 and above that needs PPC. OS 8.1 runs just fine
on my Quadra 610, which sports a 68040 chip sans FPU.
BTW, "sans" == "without"
Grace Palazzolo
Gonter <ggo...@landmarknet.net> wrote:
> Funny, Mac OS 8.1 works just fine on my Quadra 840A and my daughter's
> Quadra 650. You are right though, 8.x will not run on a 68040 Macintosh
No, 8.5 and above won't run on a 68040. A 68040, with or without FPU,
will run all Mac OS 7.1 - 8.1 .
Grace Palazzolo
Night" <mirand...@valley.net> wrote:
>
> well I just wondered. According to AppleSpec the farthest I can go is
> 7.6.1
> but I have known them to be wrong. Perhaps I'll just try it and see what
> happens.
>
> thanks all
>
> Miranda
>
I would also suggest installing the maximum amount of RAM your LCIII
will take. I don't know what that would be, off-hand.
Geof Gonter
Night" <mirand...@valley.net> wrote:
In article <ggonter-2DD2F4...@news.landmarknet.net>, Geof
Gonter <ggo...@landmarknet.net> wrote:
> > Funny, Mac OS 8.1 works just fine on my Quadra 840A and my daughter's
> > Quadra 650. You are right though, 8.x will not run on a 68040
> > Macintosh.
>
> well I just wondered. According to AppleSpec the farthest I can go is
> 7.6.1
> but I have known them to be wrong. Perhaps I'll just try it and see what
> happens.
Sorry, my original post should have been "You are right though, 8.x will
not run on a "68030" Macintosh. I am sure I'm running 8.1 on both
Quadras. 7.6.1 is as far as you can go on an 68030 machine. The post I
as responding to said you needed a PPC for 8.1.
headgap
>Funny, Mac OS 8.1 works just fine on my Quadra 840A and my daughter's
>Quadra 650. You are right though, 8.x will not run on a 68040 Macintosh.
I don't think an LCIII is an 040. Even if it would run 8.1 it is a bit fat
for that machine. I run 7.6.1 on older 030 Macs and it works with most of
the newer programs.
Bob Nunn - President, Operator Headgap Systems
President, AppleCore of Memphis, Inc.
E-mail: hea...@headgap.com
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
|Marketing, Sales and Technical Support for TeleFinder Internet BBS|
| http://www.tfbbs.com or call 901-759-1541 for info |
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
| Operator Headgap Web BBS | V.34 Modem : (901) 759-1542 |
| Supporting Mac, 64&128, Amiga | 33.6k Support: (901) 759-1543 |
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
| Visit our WWW Site at: http://www.headgap.com |
| Visit our TeleFinder Site at: bbs.headgap.com - port 1474 |
| Visit our Telnet Site at: telnet://bbs.headgap.com:1474 |
| IP Address: 208.246.252.34 Fast Web Access! |
| New AppleCore Web BBS Page http://www.memphisapplecore.com |
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
| Best Memphis Web Sites http://www.portalmemphis.com |
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
| Visit http://www.ihomedecor.com Home Decor, Value Pricing |
| Use coupon code T55 to receive $10 off any $25 order! |
| New Online Magazines - http://ihomedecor.com/magindex.asp |
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
Ask about Headgap's Cash Back Deal - Free Web Mail - Free Web Space
Advertise on Headgap - http://www.headgap.com/business.spml
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-*
Karl B
> I found an LC III in a dumpster that I am rehabbing for a friend. Can I run
> OS 8.1 on it?
No.
8.1 needs an '040 processor or better.
The latest OS you can use is 7.6.1, which needs an '020, and you have an
'030.
--
Please don't cc or reply via email! (My news service works fine!)
( Ohg vs lbh qb - erzbir gur rkgen ABFCBZ )
( Jul ABFCBZ? Jryy, V yvxr FCNZ! Vg'f lhzzl! )
http://welcome.to/KalleBoo/
Karl B
> Anyway, according to Apple, an LCIII can run 7.6.1. You might consider
> 7.5.5 anyway since it's only a little older and can be downloaded for
> free
The biggest thing in 7.6.1 is better stability for PowerMacs, and your
mac isn't a PowerMac.