Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hypercard 1.2.5? Waaaaiit A Second

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Raines Cohen

unread,
Sep 22, 1989, 5:45:40 PM9/22/89
to

> [missing versions of HyperCard speculation]

The current theories running around BMUG are:

- 1.2.3 wasn't used for fear of a lawsuit from Lotus, and
- 1.2.4 wasn't used because it would be too obvious that
. they were just skipping 1.2.3.

-- Raines

TH: 161/444

--
-------------------------------------------------------------
FidoNet: 1:161/445 UUCP: sun!apple!bmug!<User.Name>
INTERNET: bmug!<User.Name>@apple.COM or <User.Name>@bmug.fidonet.org
USNAIL: BMUG, 1442A Walnut St. #62, Berkeley, CA 94709-1496
-------------------------------------------------------------
BMUG ARPANET ADDRESSES:
Newsletter submissions: p...@bmug.fidonet.org
Membership or business: b...@bmug.fidonet.org
Information: in...@bmug.fidonet.org
Help Line Questions: he...@bmug.fidonet.org

Chuq Von Rospach

unread,
Sep 26, 1989, 8:05:08 PM9/26/89
to

The answer to "Why Hypercard 1.2.5", direct from the mouth of Dan Winkler
(posted with permission):

> - 1.2.3 wasn't used for fear of a lawsuit from Lotus, and

Close. Not worried about a lawsuit at all. They just didn't want to deal
with the situation at all. No pressure from anyone....

> - 1.2.4 wasn't used because it would be too obvious that
> . they were just skipping 1.2.3.

Nope. 4 is an unlucky number in Japan, so Gassee and the Hypercard team
decided to skip it.


--

Chuq Von Rospach <+> Editor,OtherRealms <+> Member SFWA/ASFA
ch...@apple.com <+> CI$: 73317,635 <+> [This is myself speaking. I am not Appl
Segmentation Fault. Core dumped.

ned.horvath

unread,
Sep 27, 1989, 11:07:35 AM9/27/89
to
From article <35...@apple.Apple.COM>, by ch...@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach):

>> - 1.2.4 wasn't used because it would be too obvious that
>> . they were just skipping 1.2.3.

> Nope. 4 is an unlucky number in Japan, so Gassee and the Hypercard team
> decided to skip it.

Ye gods. We finally get Nancy's astrologer out of the White House...

I guess this means that the next feature release is 1.5; 1.3 looks too
much like (dare I whisper it?) (*thirteen*), and the Japanese will shun 1.4.

Now, if Apple considered "III" unlucky, I could understand that...

=Ned=

Robert Rubinoff

unread,
Sep 27, 1989, 4:53:02 PM9/27/89
to
In article <10...@cbnewsk.ATT.COM> e...@cbnewsk.ATT.COM (ned.horvath) writes:
>From article <35...@apple.Apple.COM>, by ch...@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach):
>>> - 1.2.4 wasn't used because it would be too obvious that
>>> . they were just skipping 1.2.3.
>
>> Nope. 4 is an unlucky number in Japan, so Gassee and the Hypercard team
>> decided to skip it.
>
>Ye gods. We finally get Nancy's astrologer out of the White House...

My understanding is that the word for "4" is also the word for "death"
in Japanese. (I can't remember whether it's the
pronunciation or the written form or both.) So it's just that
Japanese are reluctant to buy a product labelled "Version 1.2.Death"
This is perhaps not the most rational thing in the world, but it's not all
that unreasonable, especially since they had already skipped version 1.2.3.
It's sort of like when Chevy discoverd they had to change the name of the
"Nova" in order to successfully sell it in Latin America.

Robert

Paul Jacoby

unread,
Sep 28, 1989, 3:56:38 PM9/28/89
to
Not to digress, but if:

>>4 is an unlucky number in Japan, so Gassee and the Hypercard team
decided to skip it.<<

Then will the Japanese see System Software 6.0.5 for the Portable and IIci?
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| UUCP: {rosevax, crash, orator}!orbit!pnet51!pj | Working with idiots keeps |
| ARPA: crash!orbit!pnet51!p...@nosc.mil | my life interesting... |
| INET: p...@pnet51.cts.com | |
`-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'

KP2 KP2

unread,
Mar 12, 2023, 9:41:46 AM3/12/23
to
I seen you on Computer Chronicles. Awesome.
0 new messages