Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Q: What is the largest harddrive I can get for my Macbook?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

top...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 26, 2009, 1:55:00 PM8/26/09
to
I have a friend who has a 15" Macbook pro intel core2duo with a
current harddrive of 120 GBs.

It has 2 G's of memory and is running 10.5.8.

She is planning to change the harddrive. What is the largest capacity
harddrive this computer can handle? Can it handle a 1TB harddrive?

Thanks

Message has been deleted

Bob Harris

unread,
Aug 26, 2009, 11:00:20 PM8/26/09
to
In article
<75e12ba1-4044-4707...@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com
>,
"top...@gmail.com" <top...@gmail.com> wrote:

I recently put a 2.5" 7200rpm 500GB Seagate SATA drive into my
MacBook (late 2006 manufacture).

Bob Harris

David Empson

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 1:08:11 AM8/27/09
to
Tim Lance <see...@bottom.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:55:00 -0500, top...@gmail.com wrote
> (in article
> <75e12ba1-4044-4707...@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):

> I've put some WesternDigital 320 B drives into both MBs and MBPs. The Hitachi
> 500 B is too thick. I know of no 1 TB laptop drives, not that I've been
> paying much attention.

Someone recently announced a 1 TB 2.5" drive (Western Digital, I think),
but it is 12 mm thick, too thick to fit in a MacBook Pro.

The highest capacity/speed drive currently available which fits in a
MacBook Pro (maximum thickness 9 mm) is 500 GB and 7200 rpm. Not sure
which brands are thin enough, but there is at least one Seagate model.

--
David Empson
dem...@actrix.gen.nz

ToprakA

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 11:02:10 AM8/27/09
to
On Aug 26, 10:08 pm, demp...@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) wrote:
> Tim Lance <see....@bottom.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:55:00 -0500, topr...@gmail.com wrote
> > (in article
> > <75e12ba1-4044-4707-a299-a85345650...@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com>):

>
> > > I have a friend who has a 15" Macbook pro  intel core2duo with a
> > > current harddrive of 120 GBs.
>
> > > It has 2 G's of memory and is running 10.5.8.
>
> > > She is planning to change the harddrive. What is the largest capacity
> > > harddrive this computer can handle?  Can it handle a 1TB harddrive?
>
> > I've put some WesternDigital 320 B drives into both MBs and MBPs. The Hitachi
> > 500 B is too thick. I know of no 1 TB laptop drives, not that I've been
> > paying much attention.
>
> Someone recently announced a 1 TB 2.5" drive (Western Digital, I think),
> but it is 12 mm thick, too thick to fit in a MacBook Pro.
>
> The highest capacity/speed drive currently available which fits in a
> MacBook Pro (maximum thickness 9 mm) is 500 GB and 7200 rpm. Not sure
> which brands are thin enough, but there is at least one Seagate model.
>
> --
> David Empson
> demp...@actrix.gen.nz

So, other than size limitations, there is no limitatio from the O/S
end?

Thanks

nospam

unread,
Aug 27, 2009, 11:23:57 AM8/27/09
to
In article
<ea97acbd-15e3-4810...@r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
ToprakA <top...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, other than size limitations, there is no limitatio from the O/S
> end?

none. the only limitation is that it must have a sata interface and be
9.5 mm thick so that it physically fits inside the laptop. as far as
the operating system is concerned, the capacity limit is *far* bigger
than any drive you'll see any time soon.

Message has been deleted

Timothy Mathews

unread,
Aug 28, 2009, 5:29:54 PM8/28/09
to

I put a Fujitsu 500 gigger in my 13" Macbook Pro

David Lesher

unread,
Sep 2, 2009, 9:24:22 PM9/2/09
to
ToprakA <top...@gmail.com> writes:


>So, other than size limitations, there is no limitatio from the O/S
>end?

There are hardware, BIOS err Firmware err EFI limits & OS limits.

The intel core2duo MacBook Pro uses SATA, and while SATA has some size
limit, I don't think current drives come close. [ISTM it's ATA6's 177
Petabytes, but I can't recall for sure.]

HFS+ has a limit of 8 EiB {i.e. 8*2^60 bytes} so I doubt that
will come up, either...

Power and cooling may be worth considerin, however...

0 new messages