Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Comparison of the hundred dollar Costco Seagate 5TB USB & 8TB USB HDD on sale now

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Arlen Holder

unread,
Nov 12, 2020, 7:22:40 PM11/12/20
to
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:25:51 -0500, Paul wrote:

> The 8TB drive is 3.5".
>
> The power requirements are 12V for motor, 5V for logic.
>
> 3.5" drives are available up to 14TB or so in capacity
> (at least, at your nearest retailer you might find them).
> Some of the larger ones than that, are only intended
> for data centers (host managed versus drive managed).
>
> The 5TB drive is a 2.5". It's the largest 2.5"
> they make. It runs off 5V only. 5V for motor, 5V for logic.
> Generally 2.5" drives try to draw no more than 1 ampere,
> and this occurs during spinup. The current consumed on
> the small 15mm tall 2.5" drives, drops back once they're
> up to speed.
>
> The 2.5" drives come in a variety of heights. 7mm & 9.5mm
> is useful in a laptop. The laptop bay is not big
> enough to support 15mm drives. The 15mm drives were
> made specifically for usage in portable external
> enclosures. It's also why you don't tend to find
> much information on 15mm ones, since they're not
> intended to be sold as "raw" drives at retail.
> As they don't fit in laptops, and nobody wants
> a steady stream of customers bringing raw 15mm
> drives back for a refund because they don't fit.
>
> External drives have a USB connector. Some drives used
> in such devices, the USB connector is part of the drive,
> and the drive cannot be "shucked" and removed for usage
> inside a SATA computer. Other external drives, there is a
> separate controller board which converts SATA protocol
> to USB protocol. Those sorts of drives can be taken
> apart and the disk reused. It's possible the 8TB Seagate
> mentioned, a 3.5", can be removed from the enclosure and
> reused. The warranty is likely void if the drive is
> used in this way (outside of its housing). Running the
> drive serial number on the warranty page, will show the
> drive itself in the bare state, has no warranty. The number
> on the housing could indicate a valid warranty exists for
> the entire item.
>
> Paul

Hi Paul,

Regarding
o 5TB Costco Item #3005555 P/N 2R2AY1-570 (STHP5000600 on sticker)
o 8TB Costco Item #8888881 P/N 1XAAY5-570 (STEL800401 on sticker)

Here are photos I just snapped for you of the two Costco drives:
o <https://i.postimg.cc/MpjQMNM7/hdd01.jpg> size & weight difference
o <https://i.postimg.cc/5tdFwgLZ/hdd02.jpg> Costco packaging
o <https://i.postimg.cc/76XGrydk/hdd03.jpg> Model numbers

Thanks for that purposefully helpful information where I must comment that
the sheer physical size & weight difference of these two Seagate devices is
immense.
o The 5TB Seagate drive weighs a puny 7 1/4 ounces all alone
o The 8TB Seagate drive weighs a whopping 30 1/2 ounces all alone
<https://i.postimg.cc/MpjQMNM7/hdd01.jpg>

Side by side the sheer physical size difference is also huge:
o <https://i.postimg.cc/5tdFwgLZ/hdd02.jpg>

These are the respective model numbers of the two hard drives:
o 8TB Seagate Backup Plus Hub P/N 1XAAP3-500 [aka Model SRD0PV1] 12VDC, 1A
o 12VDC 3.0A Schenzhen Honor Model ADS-40J-12 12036EPCU Switching Adapter
o 5TB Seagate Backup Plus Portable P/N 2R2APM-505
o <https://i.postimg.cc/76XGrydk/hdd03.jpg>

What I love about the 5TB is it doesn't require an additional 12VDC power
supply, which means, I would think, perhaps, maybe, it's more likely to
work in a decade or so, but I'm not sure of the correct logic on that.

Which is more likely to work in a decade or two from now?

> The 2.5" drives come in a variety of heights. 7mm & 9.5mm
> is useful in a laptop. The laptop bay is not big
> enough to support 15mm drives.

I do not know how tall the 5TB drive is, inside.

> External drives have a USB connector. Some drives used
> in such devices, the USB connector is part of the drive,
> and the drive cannot be "shucked" and removed for usage
> inside a SATA computer.

The possibility of being "shucked" makes a difference because we want this
drive to work in a decade or two from now.

> Running the
> drive serial number on the warranty page, will show the
> drive itself in the bare state, has no warranty. The number
> on the housing could indicate a valid warranty exists for
> the entire item.

1. I went to the Seagate warranty page
<https://www.seagate.com/support/warranty-and-replacements/>

2. I enter the 8-character serial number from the Costco sticker.

3. Your Product = Backup Plus Portable <== this is the 5TB
Model Number = STHP5000600
Serial Number = xxxxxxxx
Warranty Valid Until November 29, 2021

Your Product = Backup Plus HUB <== this is the 8TB
Model Number = STEL8000401
Serial Number = xxxxxxxx
Warranty Valid Until October 10, 2022

I'm not so much worried about warranty as I am the basic stone cold logic
of which drive is most likely to be still working a decade or two from now.
--
On Windows newsgroups everyone is always helpful even if we don't like M$.

Arlen Holder

unread,
Nov 13, 2020, 10:39:26 AM11/13/20
to
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 08:12:02 -0600, jer...@juno.com wrote:

>>Which is more likely to work in a decade or two from now?
>
> Neither. Rotating drives wear out over time. So do SSDs. If an SSD is
> not used much, it could last longer--but I would not rely on it.
> Expect to replace any drive (with today's technology) within 5-7
> years.

Hi Jerry,

Thanks for trying to help, where I apologize that _time_ is the issue.
o Not rotation time.

The drives will likely have fewer than 100 hours on them in 25 years.

While I completely understand your answer, you have to remember these
drives are _external_ drives, connected via USB, for _backup_ purposes.

Hence, rotation time isn't an issue in and of itself.
o Elapsed time is the issue (and technology changes).

Given how standards change, and the fact the 2.5 inch "portable" drive
isn't the same mechanics as the 3.5 inch "hub", and given SATA connections
and other changes over time, the question is simply one of how to choose
between them.

I apologize for not being clear that rotation time is never the issue for
backup drives (which are only connected once every few months, and even
then, for only a few hours at a time).

What matters is the technology changes that may likely occur over time, and
the reliability of the equipment over long periods of elapsed time in
storage.

I'm not so much worried about spinning time as I am the basic stone cold
logic of which drive is most likely to be still working a decade or two
from now after being stored (and while technology changes over time)?
0 new messages