Busted, Steve
Snit
you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
Good day.
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
Steve Carroll
> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
>
> Good day.
>
>
Prove it.
--
"Wish that people could be more honest and reasonable ... but that is not
likely to happen." - Snit - http://tinyurl.com/68q8n
Steve
Snit
3amjrkF...@individual.net on 3/27/05 2:24 AM:
> Snit wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
>> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
>>
>> Good day.
>>
>>
> Prove it.
Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
LOL!
--
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
Steve Carroll
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
> 3amjrkF...@individual.net on 3/27/05 2:24 AM:
>
>
>>Snit wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
>>>you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
>>>
>>>Good day.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Prove it.
>
>
> Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
>
> LOL!
>
>
your router. Is this the same router you could not figure out how to get working? Sniff too much
glue today?
Snit
>>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
>>>> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> Good day.
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>> Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
>>
>> LOL!
>>
> More reading comprehension problems, Snit? I never said it was me you were
> imagining was working on
> your router. Is this the same router you could not figure out how to get
> working? Sniff too much
> glue today?
Nice back peddle, Steve! You even remembered to toss in some unrelated BS
to obfuscate the issue. The cretin crew will see you as their hero!
--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)
Johannes Bauer
Hash: SHA1
Steve Carroll wrote:
> More reading comprehension problems, Snit?
Yes he has. Now is trollfeeding really _that_ much fun?
Greetings,
Johannes
- --
PLEASE verify my signature. Some forging troll is claiming to be me.
My GPG key id is 0xCC727E2E (dated 2004-11-03). You can get it from
wwwkeys.pgp.net or random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de.
Also: Messages from "Comcast Online" are ALWAYS forged.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCRiN+CseFG8xyfi4RAvg5AKCDC7AY/flMEG8DoaK0GpXegMoqCgCgnAEr
d/qYmrckpeXWaS96JvfbATY=
=yrLq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Snit
vkkhh2x...@snifftop.sniffdomain on 3/26/05 8:07 PM:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Carroll wrote:
>
>> More reading comprehension problems, Snit?
>
> Yes he has. Now is trollfeeding really _that_ much fun?
LOL... I feed Steve and he complains about the popcorn being stale. :)
Peter Jensen
Hash: SHA1
Snit wrote:
>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope
>>> it makes you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against
>>> the likes of you.
>>
>> Prove it.
>
> Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
Perhaps because he is the only Steve that you have been consistently
trolling recently? Seems most likely.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCRoIZd1ZThqotgfgRAn9OAJ9cxbgs59Mqmm/LsZqJnQg/IMFcvQCgpj3L
ZXbMvlHQ5fsmjq0FTIz7uc4=
=l+ly
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
PeKaJe
When I saw a sign on the freeway that said, "Los Angeles 445 miles," I
said to myself, "I've got to get out of this lane." -- Franklyn Ajaye
Steve Carroll
Johannes Bauer <dfnson...@gmx.de> wrote:
Until now, I haven't answered this thread. The several posting you see
here are forged (and not very good, either... which leads me to believe
it's Snit doing the forging).
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
>
> Good day.
Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
"teacher"? :)
--
"Wish that people could be more honest and reasonable ... but that is not
likely to happen." - Snit - http://tinyurl.com/68q8n
"I openly admit to my errors." - Snit
Steve
Steve Travis
> Snit wrote:
>
>> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
>> 3amjrkF...@individual.net on 3/27/05 2:24 AM:
>>
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope
>>>> it makes
>>>> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes
>>>> of you.
>>>>
>>>> Good day.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>>
> More reading comprehension problems, Snit? I never said it was me you
> were imagining was working on your router. Is this the same router you
> could not figure out how to get working? Sniff too much glue today?
You get the feeling that snit's brain would explode if people were to
ignore him.
We should try that. Talk about him, but not TO him. Basically treat
all his posts, like they never even made it to the CSMA.. That should
be worth a few good laughs. Then he can get his sock puppets out and
have arguements with them.
He sais he's a teacher... I think he 'believes' that he's a teacher,
but we all know that for you to qualify as a teacher, your students
can't be the voices in your head.
Snit
> In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
>> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
>>
>> Good day.
>
> Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
> "teacher"? :)
You used this troll before, Steve. It was not a good one the first time.
--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)
_________________________________________
Snit
42468221$0$166$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk on 3/27/05 2:51 AM:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Snit wrote:
>
>>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope
>>>> it makes you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against
>>>> the likes of you.
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>> Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
>
> Perhaps because he is the only Steve that you have been consistently
> trolling recently? Seems most likely.
There are at least two other Steve's who have trolled me in the last week or
so. Funny how Steve Carroll "knew" it was him. No doubt from him. No
questioning.
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "Steve Carroll" <no...@nowhere.com> stated in post
> noone-AE3C69....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 3/27/05 9:24 AM:
>
> > In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> > Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it
> >> makes
> >> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of
> >> you.
> >>
> >> Good day.
> >
> > Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
> > "teacher"? :)
>
> You used this troll before, Steve. It was not a good one the first time.
Sounds feasible... except for the fact that you told this ng that you
had a lot of problems getting your Linksys router working. Care to
expound on your lie that I was 'working' on your router? Tell me, did I
fix it for you, too?
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "Peter Jensen" <use...@pekajemaps.homeip.net> stated in post
> 42468221$0$166$edfa...@dtext01.news.tele.dk on 3/27/05 2:51 AM:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Snit wrote:
> >
> >>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope
> >>>> it makes you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against
> >>>> the likes of you.
> >>>
> >>> Prove it.
> >>
> >> Gee, what made you think you were the "Steve" in question?
> >
> > Perhaps because he is the only Steve that you have been consistently
> > trolling recently? Seems most likely.
>
> There are at least two other Steve's who have trolled me in the last week or
> so. Funny how Steve Carroll "knew" it was him. No doubt from him. No
> questioning.
Not only was it not me who asked you to "prove it" here, all the forger
did was ask you to prove it, nothing else. Don't worry, Snit.. no one
*actually* expect you to be able to do that:) They are well used to you
making baseless accusations...
--
"Wish that people could be more honest and reasonable ... but that is not
likely to happen." - Snit - http://tinyurl.com/68q8n
"I openly admit to my errors." - Snit
Steve
Tim Adams
Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it makes
> > you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of you.
> >
> > Good day.
>
> Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
> "teacher"? :)
If he did, it was most likely with a lot of help from the other patients
at the asylum where he lives.
--
reguarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm
Tim
Steve Carroll
<teadams$2$0$0$3-41A01A.18...@news1.east.earthlink.net>,
Tim Adams <teadams$2$0$0$3...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> In article <noone-AE3C69....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> > Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > > Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it
> > > makes
> > > you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of
> > > you.
> > >
> > > Good day.
> >
> > Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
> > "teacher"? :)
>
> If he did, it was most likely with a lot of help from the other patients
> at the asylum where he lives.
ROFL!
seymour
> In article <noone-AE3C69....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>
>> > Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it
>> > makes
>> > you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of
>> > you.
>> >
>> > Good day.
>>
>> Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
>> "teacher"? :)
>
> If he did, it was most likely with a lot of help from the other patients
> at the asylum where he lives.
>
Prove it.
Snit
27126035....@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID on 3/28/05 12:35 AM:
LOL...
I must say, it is funny to watch Steve Carroll and Tim Adams make asses of
themselves and then, in an effort to minimize there embarrassment, support
each other's silliness.
What they don't do, however, is actually support their wild claims - not
just the clearly silly ones like what Tim wrote above, but the ones which
are just outright lies, such as Steve's recent accusations:
I'm merely pointing out that you often use the "fact" of being a
"teacher" of IT in your arguments, as if this "fact" lends some weight
to your argument.
and
...Snit fails to provide any support for his claim that he's a
"teacher", thereby making Mikey a liar ...
When I pointed out the fact that Steve was lying, he responded with:
Irrelevant, which is why you bring it up. I'm talking about your claimed
credentials.
It has become so easy to point out Steve's lies...
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.
steve....@gmail.com
Snit wrote:
> I must say, it is funny to watch Steve Carroll and Tim Adams make
asses of
> themselves and then, in an effort to minimize there embarrassment,
support
> each other's silliness.
Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost all self respect and
has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses' when referring to
others.
Oh, how could the morally superior snit have fallen so low.. Please
take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel embarassed for him. Or
perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more happy glue (and the
appropriate plastic bags).
Snit
1111981068....@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com on 3/27/05 8:37 PM:
Funny how you snipped the rest of the post - it shows where I provide
specific support - in the form of exact quotes from Steve - to show he is
acting like an ass.
Now let's look at your comments about drug usage - as pathetic trolling
claim your "borrowed" from Steve Carroll. Like Steve, however, you have no
support for your accusations - because your accusations are lies.
The next time you try to play "moral high ground" with me, remember that I
have just pointed out a clear and unambiguous lie of yours... that you made
in "retaliation" for me telling the truth.
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
_________________________________________
Tim Adams
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> "seymour" <feee...@littleshop.horrors> stated in post
> 27126035....@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID on 3/28/05 12:35 AM:
>
> > Tim Adams wrote:
> >
> >> In article <noone-AE3C69....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> >> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> >>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it
> >>>> makes
> >>>> you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the likes of
> >>>> you.
> >>>>
> >>>> Good day.
> >>>
> >>> Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
> >>> "teacher"? :)
> >>
> >> If he did, it was most likely with a lot of help from the other patients
> >> at the asylum where he lives.
> >>
> >
> > Prove it.
>
> LOL...
>
> I must say,
if you read what snit posts, you'll see all the proof you need.
Snit
teadams$2$0$0$3-870286.23...@news1.east.earthlink.net on 3/27/05
9:07 PM:
> In article <BE6CAC2D.DB20%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>
>> "seymour" <feee...@littleshop.horrors> stated in post
>> 27126035....@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID on 3/28/05 12:35 AM:
>>
>>> Tim Adams wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <noone-AE3C69....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
>>>> Steve Carroll <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <BE6B4800.D624%SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>,
>>>>> Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm, seems you have been working on my router a bit today... hope it
>>>>>> makes you happy. By the way, my network is quite secure against the
>>>>>> likes of you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good day.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Never even seen your router, Snit. Did you finally get it working.
>>>>> "teacher"? :)
>>>>>
>>>> If he did, it was most likely with a lot of help from the other patients at
>>>> the asylum where he lives.
>>>
>>> Prove it.
>>
>> LOL...
>>
>> I must say, it is funny to watch Steve Carroll and Tim Adams make asses of
>> themselves and then, in an effort to minimize there embarrassment, support
>> each other's silliness.
>>
>> What they don't do, however, is actually support their wild claims - not just
>> the clearly silly ones like what Tim wrote above, but the ones which are just
>> outright lies, such as Steve's recent accusations:
>>
>> I'm merely pointing out that you often use the "fact" of being a
>> "teacher" of IT in your arguments, as if this "fact" lends some weight
>> to your argument.
>>
>> and
>>
>> ...Snit fails to provide any support for his claim that he's a
>> "teacher", thereby making Mikey a liar ...
>>
>> When I pointed out the fact that Steve was lying, he responded with:
>>
>> Irrelevant, which is why you bring it up. I'm talking about your claimed
>> credentials.
>>
>> It has become so easy to point out Steve's lies...
>
> if you read what snit posts, you'll see all the proof you need.
You are right that if you read my posts you will see all the proof you need
of Steve's lies - but really you only need to look at his.
Oh, by the way, your news reader seems to have snipped some of my post. You
might want to look into having your computer fixed... unless you wish to me
to believe it was user error on your part.
--
I wrote:
It has become so easy to point out Steve's lies...
Tim Adams replied:
if you read what snit posts, you'll see all the proof you need.
_________________________________________
Steve Travis
...something about the voices in his head....
Tim Adams
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
that snit lies, distorts what others write by taking comments out of
context, and also has a very bad reading comprehension problem.
Snit
7:32 AM:
You removed context that I returned. If you do not like it, stop
dishonestly removing context.
--
I wrote:
It has become so easy to point out Steve's lies...
Tim Adams replied:
if you read what snit posts, you'll see all the proof you need.
_________________________________________
Tim Adams
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
and once again snit adds nothing
seymour
Prove it.
Snit
I just quoted two of them, Mr. Sock Puppet. What more do you need?
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
_________________________________________
seymour
So I take it you think I'm someone's sock puppet. Exactly who's sock puppet
do you think I am?
Snit
Whose sock puppet you are is irrelevant - but I did note that you have
dropped your request for me to prove what I have already shown you. Thank
you.
--
"Innovation is not about saying yes to everything. It's about saying NO to
all but the most crucial features." -- Steve Jobs
seymour
Dude, if you're going to claim that I am someone's sock puppet, and if you
aren't going to provide evidence for your claim, then at least extend me
the courtesy of telling me who you think I am.
Snit
I suggest you look at your headers - and compare them with your main ID.
--
"If you have integrity, nothing else matters." - Alan Simpson
seymour
Do your own research and support your claim, please.
Snit
It is merely my belief, based on knowledge all have available. If I am
wrong, I apologize.
In any case, I thank you again for dropping your request for me to prove
what I had already shown you.
--
I am at the point of wanting to stir up some sh*t to get noticed, even if it
means repercussions. -- Steve Carroll
seymour
I don't normally post in this newsgroup, although I have been reading it for
a long time. I'd still like to know who you thought I was though.And why!
> In any case, I thank you again for dropping your request for me to prove
> what I had already shown you.
I understand Steve's POV much better than yours in the above exchanges. I
think that you are blowing things out of proportion.
Snit
Steve has claimed that I am lying when I say I am a teacher. He is not only
wrong, he is lying. If you do claim to "understand" his point of view, then
that supports my belief about you. It is not, however, proof.
--
I know, this shows how weak my game really is. -- Steve Carroll
seymour
It looks like what they say about you is true. You are twisting my words.
Hasta la pasta, Snit.
Snit
I do that all the time. I just get mad when it is pointed out.
Snit
Sorry, I thought you were one of my sock puppets. I have so many I sometimes lose track.
Snit
I never support my claims. I do not know how.
Steve Carroll
Snit <SN...@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> wrote:
And I'm not alone... but what text of mine are you taking issue with?
Was it this?
"...Snit fails to provide any support for his claim that he's a
"teacher", thereby making Mikey a liar ..."
This is the text you have been showing recently to claim I am "lying".
I'll save you some time and tell you right now that it has nothing to do
with whether or not you are a "teacher". You are lying because you've
represented yourself as a person who supports his claims very well with
data he can back up:
"What, specifically, is offensive about my style? The fact that I base
my claims on data I can back up? The fact that I support my claims
very well? Be specific"
Well, you didn't support your "teacher" claim when Steve Travis asked
you to. You simply told him something tantamount to:
You wouldn't believe any proof I have, so what's the point in showing
you?
You're likely right about that... but it's besides the point that you
are a hypocritical liar for the reason I just stated.
> He is not only wrong, he is lying.
Fine... all that's left now is for you to prove this claim that I'm
"lying".
> If you do claim to "understand" his point of view, then
> that supports my belief about you. It is not, however, proof.
--
Elizabot v2.0.2
There is no doubt that Snit demeans himself in this ng pretty much on
daily basis. The days he doesn't demean himself are the days he does not
post, which are few and far between.
--
By responding to Elizabot v2.0.2 you implicitly agree to the TOS at:
http://elizabot.spymac.net/
Snit
noone-4F4CD0....@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 3/27/05 8:14 AM:
>> Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> More reading comprehension problems, Snit?
>>
>> Yes he has. Now is trollfeeding really _that_ much fun?
>
> Until now, I haven't answered this thread. The several posting you see
> here are forged (and not very good, either... which leads me to believe
> it's Snit doing the forging).
LOL... hmmm, you have been following me around making accusations of my
forging your name - though you could find no proof of your accusations - and
*magically* you start getting "forged" and then blame me.
Now let's see... what could be going on? LOL.
You are really not a very bright guy, Steve...
--
€ As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse
€ If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality")
€ One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted