Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Magic Mouse - doesn't work too well

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Maurice

unread,
Dec 30, 2009, 5:32:09 PM12/30/09
to
So what else is new.

The best Apple combo - a broken 27 iMac with a broken Magic Mouse.

http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-10422849-263.html?tag=mncol;txt

A few people have noticed Apple's new multitouch "Magic Mouse" will
disconnect at seemingly random times. When the computer is booted the mice
connect just fine and are usable for a while; however, they will soon become
unresponsive and the "Connection Lost" icon will float at the bottom of the
screen.

When this happens, people have had mixed results with trying to get the mice
reconnected. Some have claimed that just clicking the mice will get them to
connect again, and others have mentioned tapping it on the case of their
desktop computers was how they get it to connect.

This problem appears to be with the mice losing power when movements jar the
batteries slightly. In some cases people have been able to cause the mouse
to disconnect by holding it up from the trackpad and firmly tapping on the
top side of the mouse. This suggests that slight battery movement may cause
the mice to lose power, and as such there are a couple of remedies
available:

I like the: "Wedge paper under the batteries" fix


Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 10:13:19 AM1/4/10
to

"Maurice" <Mauric...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ExQ_m.121319$gg6....@newsfe25.iad...

This is Apple Tradition. It harkens back to the Apple III "fix..." pick
it up and drop it on your desk! LOL


Lloyd Parsons

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 10:34:38 AM1/4/10
to
In article <kAn0n.14156$DY5....@newsfe08.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

Note the article says a 'few' with no definition of that.

I know that mine and others that I regularly correspond with, haven't
had any issues with the Magic Mouse at all.

Steve Hix

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:17:59 PM1/4/10
to

It doesn't matter what your chosen subject, you just cannot either get
it right, or tell the whole truth, can you?

1 - Apple never suggested "pick[ing] it up and drop[ping] it on your
desk". Although it's a bit more amusing than the truth, which was to
lift the front edge of the keyboard about an inch, then releasing it.

2 - It was not, nor was it ever suggested to be a fix; it was a
workaround until the fix could be pushed out to the field.

3- As usual, you cannot bear to tell the full truth, that Apple
redesigned the motherboard to fix the problem of thermal flexing causing
some socketed chips to "walk" up out of full contact, and at no cost to
the user replaced every customer's Apple/// motherboard. That was the
fix.

No, the cheap shot, the lie for effect is more to your liking than the
truth. Always.

One would think you'd get tired of it, or eventually want to grow up,
but I guess not.

Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:52:21 PM1/4/10
to

"Steve Hix" <se...@NOSPAMmac.comINVALID> wrote in message
news:sehix-CFDA33....@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com...

>> In article <kAn0n.14156$DY5....@newsfe08.iad>,
>> "Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This is Apple Tradition. It harkens back to the Apple III "fix..."
>> > pick
>> > it up and drop it on your desk! LOL
>
> It doesn't matter what your chosen subject, you just cannot either get
> it right, or tell the whole truth, can you?

Does projecting your circumstances into me help to soothe your dark soul?

> 1 - Apple never suggested "pick[ing] it up and drop[ping] it on your
> desk". Although it's a bit more amusing than the truth, which was to
> lift the front edge of the keyboard about an inch, then releasing it.

IOW, to all but pedantic individual such as yourself, I was correct. Your
revisions do not make that way of doing things into a professional way of
solving a problem. Apple, like you, is a laughing stock over this.

> 2 - It was not, nor was it ever suggested to be a fix; it was a
> workaround until the fix could be pushed out to the field.

Now you're just making up crap again.

> 3- As usual, you cannot bear to tell the full truth, that Apple
> redesigned the motherboard to fix the problem of thermal flexing causing
> some socketed chips to "walk" up out of full contact, and at no cost to
> the user replaced every customer's Apple/// motherboard. That was the
> fix.

The real truth is the problem was caused by a bad power supply connector.
The engineer who knew the cause of the problem kept it to himself because of
a "lowly engineer" remark made by Steve Jobs.

The boards weren't replaced as you claim either. If Apple had been doing
that there would have been no need to make fools of themselves by telling
customers to drop the their computers on their desks to "fix" them.

Also, any overheating problem was caused by the incompetence of Steve Jobs
insisting on fanless computers.

> No, the cheap shot, the lie for effect is more to your liking than the
> truth. Always.

You have me confused with Steve Hix, who doesn't have the guts to answer me
directly.

> One would think you'd get tired of it, or eventually want to grow up,
> but I guess not.

You never get tired of projecting.


Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:55:27 PM1/4/10
to

"Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:lloydparsons-6DF1...@port80.individual.net...

Yes, I note that Maccies regularly attempt to dismiss a Mac problem by
claiming it rarely happens, without having any figures at all on how often
it does.

> I know that mine and others that I regularly correspond with, haven't
> had any issues with the Magic Mouse at all.

Yet another Maccie dismissing Mac problems by saying it never happens to
them. I should also be able to make 99.99% of Windows problems disappear
in a puff of smoke, if not for the double standards of this group.


Tim Murray

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 2:50:34 PM1/4/10
to
Edwin wrote:
> Yes, I note that Maccies regularly attempt to dismiss a Mac problem by
> claiming it rarely happens, without having any figures at all on how often
> it does.

And the information you have to counter it is ... where?

Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:17:50 PM1/4/10
to

"Tim Murray" <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote in message
news:hhtgqa$ite$2...@news.eternal-september.org...

I'd like to give you directions to the real world, but I have no idea how to
get from where you are to here.


Tim Murray

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:20:08 PM1/4/10
to
Edwin wrote:

>
> "Tim Murray" <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote:
>> Edwin wrote:
>>> Yes, I note that Maccies regularly attempt to dismiss a Mac problem by
>>> claiming it rarely happens, without having any figures at all on how
>>> often it does.
>>
>> And the information you have to counter it is ... where?
>
> I'd like to give you directions to the real world, but I have no idea how
> to get from where you are to here.
>

I'd like to see you post some real information.

Lloyd Parsons

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:29:31 PM1/4/10
to
In article <hhtiho$u0c$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
Tim Murray <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote:

He doesn't have any

Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:30:52 PM1/4/10
to

"Tim Murray" <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote in message
news:hhtiho$u0c$2...@news.eternal-september.org...

Your wish has been granted repeatedly.


Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 3:58:46 PM1/4/10
to

"Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:lloydparsons-06B7...@port80.individual.net...

You have me confused with Lloyd Parsons.


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:14:30 PM1/4/10
to
In article <lloydparsons-06B7...@port80.individual.net>,
Lloyd Parsons <lloydp...@mac.com> wrote:

He never does...

--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)

Snit

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:17:55 PM1/4/10
to
Edwin stated in post aEs0n.12549$w21....@newsfe17.iad on 1/4/10 1:58 PM:

>>> I'd like to see you post some real information.
>>
>> He doesn't have any
>
> You have me confused with Lloyd Parsons.

I have pointed out, just today, posts where you have failed to make any
point. This does not mean you never post any real information, but you
clearly have a tendency to post without offering any real information or
anything else of value.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:24:45 PM1/4/10
to

"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message
news:C767A913.5C941%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...

> Edwin stated in post aEs0n.12549$w21....@newsfe17.iad on 1/4/10 1:58 PM:
>
>>>> I'd like to see you post some real information.
>>>
>>> He doesn't have any
>>
>> You have me confused with Lloyd Parsons.
>
> I have pointed out, just today, posts where you have failed to make any
> point.

You told another lie. Nobody is surprised.

> This does not mean you never post any real information, but you
> clearly have a tendency to post without offering any real information or
> anything else of value.

You have me confused with Snit.


Snit

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:27:07 PM1/4/10
to
Edwin stated in post y0t0n.5958$_H7....@newsfe24.iad on 1/4/10 2:24 PM:

>
> "Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message
> news:C767A913.5C941%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...
>> Edwin stated in post aEs0n.12549$w21....@newsfe17.iad on 1/4/10 1:58 PM:
>>
>>>>> I'd like to see you post some real information.
>>>>
>>>> He doesn't have any
>>>
>>> You have me confused with Lloyd Parsons.
>>
>> I have pointed out, just today, posts where you have failed to make any
>> point.
>
> You told another lie. Nobody is surprised.

Do you need links to the posts where I have done so today?

>> This does not mean you never post any real information, but you
>> clearly have a tendency to post without offering any real information or
>> anything else of value.
>
> You have me confused with Snit.

See: you post nonsense. You do not even try to make a point.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


Edwin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:27:57 PM1/4/10
to

"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-0E383...@news.shawcable.com...

> In article <lloydparsons-06B7...@port80.individual.net>,
> Lloyd Parsons <lloydp...@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <hhtiho$u0c$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Tim Murray <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Edwin wrote:
>> > >
>> > > "Tim Murray" <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote:
>> > >> Edwin wrote:
>> > >>> Yes, I note that Maccies regularly attempt to dismiss a Mac problem
>> > >>> by
>> > >>> claiming it rarely happens, without having any figures at all on
>> > >>> how
>> > >>> often it does.
>> > >>
>> > >> And the information you have to counter it is ... where?
>> > >
>> > > I'd like to give you directions to the real world, but I have no idea
>> > > how
>> > > to get from where you are to here.
>> > >
>> >
>> > I'd like to see you post some real information.
>>
>> He doesn't have any
>
> He never does...

Where "he" means "Alan Baker."


Alan Baker

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 4:29:04 PM1/4/10
to
In article <y3t0n.1914$nR4....@newsfe01.iad>,
"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote:

LOL

Maurice

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:58:18 PM1/4/10
to

"Edwin" <thor...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:kAn0n.14156$DY5....@newsfe08.iad...

It's even worse than that. Seems as if Apple's trend is to foist untested
crap on the faithful.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/185796/apples_magic_mouse_draining_bluetooth_keyboard_batteries.html

Apple's Magic Mouse is reportedly draining the batteries of Bluetooth
keyboards, according to the company's own discussion forums.
Forum members are reporting having to change batteries every week with some
debate over Apple's acknowledgement of the issue.

"I went to my local (US) Apple Store and the manager - after talking to the
folks in back - admitted that Apple was 'aware of the problem,'" reports
Stephen Hacker.

However, Michael Thomas O'Halloran based in Sydney, Australia, claims Apple
are ignoring or are unaware of the problem.


Edwin

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 11:16:44 AM1/8/10
to

"Snit" <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message
news:C767AB3B.5C957%use...@gallopinginsanity.com...

One day scientists may discover which variety of kiwi fruit you evolved
from.


0 new messages