September 2008 Quotes about Steve Carroll
Snit
comment about Bush many years ago that you think he did not
prove and because of that you think it is fine to accuse him
of forging your posts without any evidence at all and you
expect him to jump in and defend you when others call you
names when you act like a complete asshole. Please, Steve,
tell me that I am wrong about you being that stupid.
So you claim snit lies and therefore beause he lies, you get
to be a lying fuck tube with anyone you want to declare to be
a snit sock.
So, Steve am I a snit puppet like you deluded previously?
Because, fuck tube, you have to prove I am snit BEFORE you
can assert that you are using the same tactics. Now, prove
I am a snit sockpuppet, your assertion, or admit you are a
completely clueless fuck tube.
So, you can't prove that 'Ratz is Snit's sock.
Never said it was. But your retorts after being caught with
your foot in your mouth, they have all been weak.
You would have been better off by accepting that you'd made a
fool of yourself. Instead, you've chosen to act like a
grade-schooler.
This isn't worth my time. Grow up.
Where is the evidence of sock puppetry Steve? Do you think
hiding like a spanked coward will help your case?
Why did you claim things were snipped when they were still in
the post?
When will you stop lying?
Please post edit everything, again, Steve.
None of that is support for anything but the affirmation, "I
HATE SNIT AND I WANT HIM TO DIE!!!!!" You have to prove that
he is lying and socking up (to people who could not possibly
give a flying fuck about you, Snit, or your tiff with him) to
get anyone thus disinterested to believe that you are, in
fact, not lying or socking up yourself.
Alternatively, you can go on to win many awards for
dipshittery, looniness, pathological lying, and sockpuppetry,
and get listed on Kookpedia, where at least two kooks have
made it damn clear they don't care to be litsed, and only
gotten their way because they have nyms or nicknames on
usenet. You have no such protection, so you'll be "Steve
Carroll" on all Kookpedia pages, and "Steve_Carroll" in the
URL.
So you admit you are a lying scumbag.
Hint: You are claiming someone with years of posting with the
exact same nym & email is a sockpuppet of someone with much
less posting history.
So how exactly does that work, Steve? Explain how I could be
posting years in advance and be a sockpuppet now?
<Insert next lying evasion>
Weak, carroll.
Steve, I am still awaiting your proof I am a snit sock
puppet. More evasions will be proof you are a lying scum bag.
What is required is you post something other than your
opinion as proof:
Care to share of your abundant wisdom, carroll?
I didn't bring up the economy. I even pointed out that I was
*not* talking about the economy. But you, with your twisted
"alice in wonderland"-logic, immediately assumed I was
talking about the economy. You need to have your head
examined.
Running away? No. I'm watching your "logic" once again snarl
itself up like a plate of spaghetti. Just like it always
does.
What are you going on about *this* time?
I've decided to accept the nomination, not for the evidence
presented /prior/ to the nomination, which might have
convinced me to at least excise Steve Carroll from the "COLA
Kook Collective" but from the ample evidence Mr. Carroll
presented afterwards. At some point, he exceeded the "doth
protest too much" threshold.
Poor Steve, can't understand when he is asked a direct
question and then is stupid. I could have said "acts stupid"
but I doubt he is acting.
The only thing you proved is that you're as scrambled as
always.
Right... care to elaborate on this? Use a tiny teaspoon
please. Assume that I'm *really* stupid.
For the slow kid:
1. You claim I am snit's sock.
2. you claim you get to use the same tactics as snit
because I am snit's sock.
3. You cannot show the slightest piece of evidence that I am snit.
Ergo you cannot whine about anyone's tactics unless you can
supply evidence that either of your claims can be supported
by evidence.
Does that help, fuck tube?
Or are you just going to continue to claim that anyone who
thinks you an obsessive fuck tube to be a snit sock.
Only I wasn't talking about the economy. You skipped tracks.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:03:33 -0600, a coward and pest named
Steve Carroll lied: Then lied about lying, lied about having
lied about lying, lied some more to cover up the previous
lies, and lied again.
Note: Steve once again runs away from posting his proof.
"Which sockpuppets would those be, Steve? Itemize the one YOU
think are me." What's the matter, chickenshit, you said I was
a snit sock, now prove it.
No, I'm going to make a distinction between sentences that
contain the word "not" and sentences that don't.
Because, fuck tube, you have to prove I am snit BEFORE you can
assert that you are using the same tactics. Now, prove I am a
snit sockpuppet, your assertion, or admit you are a completely
clueless fuck tube.
What are you talking about now?
So all you can do is make up more delusion and lies in a
pathetic attempt to cover for your previous lies. What's the
matter, Steve, you could not find a lie, could you? All you
can find is you hiding behind snit's skirts. How does that
make you feel Steve, knowing that the only sense of safety
you have is cowering in the shadows like a beaten little
puppy.
Stevie once more evades and hides:
************************************************
>> >>So here is where you show I lied about you:
************************************************
When you going to show these lies, Steve? You going to keep
snipping and running and hiding behind Snit. You are a
gutless little crybaby.
The only reason you want to use your twisted view of his
standards is you have none of your own. Clearly your word
means nothing to you. You fucking bitch about how Snit
talked badly about Bushy years ago so you get to be an
asshole and lie about him all you want. Are you stoned? Are
you really that stupid and fucked up? Get a goddam life
already!
Steve fucktube Carroll blew a gasket because someone said
something mean about his buddy Bushy. Well Fucktube Carroll,
Bushy is a law breaking asshole of galactic proportions who
lies to the world for a drop of oil. He can bend over
forwards and take it up the ass from Cheney for all I care.
Are you going to chase me down for years now to and lie about
me forging you?
No corrections offered, so now we know the real story here:
Snit made some comment about Bush many years ago that you
think he did not prove and because of that you think it is
fine to accuse him of forging your posts without any evidence
at all and you expect him to jump in and defend you when
others call you names when you act like a complete asshole.
You clearly are that stupid.
I have seen Snit point to his website where he does have
support. Have you seen it? Do you have a counter arguement?
I bet not! Snit made some comment about Bush many years ago
that you think he did not prove and because of that you think
it is fine to accuse him of forging your posts without any
evidence at all and you expect him to jump in and defend you
when others call you names when you act like a complete
asshole.
Why? Because now you will follow me around for years
accusing me of forging your posts, too? Are you making a
threat? Are you going to try to hunt me down and fuck with
me, too?
Now you accept Snit offered support. Lovely. Do you have
anything to counter his support or will you just follow him
around for eternity claiming he is forging you?
Shove your crap up your ass, Steve. Snit has posted his
website that has his argument. Can you refute it or will you
just continue to lie about him throughout eternity because he
said something mean about Bushy the war monger?
You clearly are in a perpetual mental breakdown you fucktube.
...You have labelled Snit as being guilty of forging you.
When pressed to provide proof, you provide over 100 quotes
from various individuals regarding their perceptions of him.
That isn't proof of anything except that he lives rent-free
in a whole lot of heads. Therefore, by the definition you
just gave me, you are, indeed, a thug, as well as a Rethug.
And you are a dissembling fuck tube.
Snit made a comment about Bushy years ago that set you off so
now you get to accuse him of forging your posts and you think
that is just fine. You are fucked up more than most of the
idiots who post to Usenet.
So is 5 days enough for you to have come up with a response,
fucktube?
Of sweet fuck-all. Voltaire said, "A witty saying proves
nothing." Your quotes aren't even /witty/. Who gives a shit
what people "believe"? It doesn't mean you've proven Snit to
be a liar for a second. As for being a troll, most usenetters
are that. The ones who aren't trolling are k00ky wallflowers
who want no one to reply to them. Try again, slaphead.
So you'd rather not prove any of your claims, but instead
keep foaming away at Snit and anyone who dares question your
attacks on him. You're gonna walk away with that CNOTM.
Your statement, cupcake, you provide proof of your own
assertion. Here is a hint, I don't give one flying Ratz ass
about your co-dependant obsession with snit. Now back to the
question you cannot answer: :What's the matter, chickenshit,
you said I was a snit sock, now prove it. <Next cowardly
avoidance and obfuscation>
Do shut the fuck up.
You were asked to provide YOUR evidence not what other unknown
people write. "Which sockpuppets would those be, Steve? Itemize
the one YOU think are me."
What lie did I post? You can of course show where I lied
about anything about you, right? Proof is so important to you
and lying is so egregious to you you would noyt want to be
caught lying yourself, right? So here is where you show I
lied about you:
Which sockpuppets would those be, Steve? Itemize the one YOU
think are me.
You keep whining about Snit saying he did not have proof. So
what? Did he have support? Do you think a lack of proof is
the same as a disproof? Are you hoping Bushy jumps in Air
Force One to come meet you and then meat you?
Prove it, moron. You made a claim, now prove you did not lie.
"What's the matter, chickenshit, you said I was a snit sock,
now prove it." <insert next obfuscation>
What else will netkook Steve obsess over next?
Come on fuck tube, where was the *post*? To what am I
replying? Demonstrate how that *post* that has no text in the
body and consists of just headers is not a *post*.
Steve = Nutjob
Oh how cute! Another 29 percenter!
Well, that's where you're royally fucked, then, isn't it?
Because Snit's proof that Bush is a war criminal is possessed
of Herculean strength, next to your 98-pound weakling that he
is a sockpuppeteer.
Look, I don't care who is who. I comment on topics, I
generally don't care who writes the subject matter.
And we should care as to his ethnicity/religion
precisely...why?
Again, you think the opinions of posters who are mostly
amateur kookologists (at best -- I saw one single nym
belonging to an accredited pro) and (in at least a few cases)
k00ks is enough to sway me on the subject of Snit's kookery.
You are, at minimum, at least as obsessed as he is, and that
isn't taking into account you getting completely thrashed in
a debate about Bush five years ago, then going on a five-year
mission of destruction against Glasser. Tell me, do you still
support the Idiot Tyrant?
Will you _ever_ stop lying?
Did he offer support? Was the support strong? Was there any
counter support? And why the hell do you care if this
happened years ago? Did Bushy promise you a blow job if you
defended him for the rest of eternity?
Oh, shut up, you whiny little fuckbot.
You need to look at your own moral scorecard in these
matters.
Steve Carroll is the resident right wing nutjob over in mac
advocacy. Expect some kind of CRAZED response.
<Proof Steve Carrol is a clueless knob><Compounding the
clueless knob nature>
WOOT! Paranoia!!!! So I posted without anything in the body,
is that a post or not, fuck tube?
He did in fact say "You", in reply to me, when he was
referring to you, so I'd say you're the one who is apparently
an ESL student -- and you aren't exactly in a good position
to be chiding anyone about this, Mr. "I think Everyone Is A
Snit Sock If They Don't Agree With Me About Snit". You
exhibit no understanding as to what a "sockpuppet" is, nor
are you aware of the fact that Snit is on a Windows box,
whilst I am using Linux, as my headers will reveal.
Note: No response.
What exactly does the following mean in response to you being
shown to be a complete idiot?
So was it a post or not? Be a man, stand up for what you
believe, show how a post that has nothing in the body and
only headers is not a post.
It gets more deliciously k00ky with age...
Nice lie, Steve. Why didn't you claim I snipped what was not
snipped, again?
...
Why would you need to edit your comments, coward?
I see YOU finally snipped your comments you were claiming I
snipped. How's that one working out, liar.
Still have not seen one shred of evidence to support you lies
I am someone's sock puppet. Hell, show I am anyone's
sockpuppet but my own.
Poor Steve, left repeating his lies.
...
Where did I snip it Steve (it is ALL still there Steve)? You
are lying, again.
What was snipped Steve? It is ALL still there, right where it
was left. I am coming to the conclusion tha that it isn't
that you lie but that you are too stupid to recognize reality
when you see it.
Now, when do you connect the aratzio nym to the snit nym and
prove that I am a sock puppet rather than someone that just
considers you an idiot.
I just asked you. So where is it Steve? Where is the proof
you claim to have I am a snit sock puppet, steve. You do have
the proof? You know something like right below, evidence you
are a lying scumbag.
Now go ahead and snip the verifiable facts and pretend you did
not lie, again.
Arguing that Snit needs to prove it is all the proof I need
of your raging k00kery.
For his argument that my reference to the headers from two of
his posts as "posts" is proof that I am unable to distinguish
between a post and a header, and further, his claim that he
is being "forged" (apparently, by someone duplicating his
posts on a Windoze box, but not adding any new content, or
making any changes at all -- dude, who cares? You did in fact
say what you were quoted as saying, which is the point), I,
Snarky (not Snit, not Aratzio, not Kadaitcha Man, not Gary
"flatfish" Stewart, or any other poster on Steve's haet
lits), do hereby nominate Steve Carroll for Clueless Newbie
of the Month.
You do know what the word "executive" means, don't you?
You ARE a crazed right wing nutjob.
So ALL the people who point out that you are a complete
fucking idiot are actually just one person? Bizarre.
So, let us grant, for the purposes of argument only, that it
is true that there are MS advocates posting in cola who are
lying sacks of shit. How does that justify finding out
people's names and where they work then targeting them in
real life until they break?
So you're still lying, then. Like any (Re)thug.
Whilst I'm not certain if Fitton and Carroll (et al) acts of
stalking and outer-filthing exemplify "the eponymous founder
of this award", one thing is for sure, while a thoroughly
good rogering with a splintery bush-jarrah pole is in order
for the cola kooks, a painfully sharp anal pineapple is the
next best thing.
Cmon, fucktube, show how your *headers are not a post* works.
Feel free to prove that it was a forged post *anytime*,
fuckface. AFAIAC, it has been proven to be yours.
Steve's too much the coward to go look it up. I compared the
alleged forgery to the post where he makes the claim, and the
differences are irrelevant. Same newsreader, same OS, same
NSP -- those are the things one would need to be a real
0BsEsS0 to reproduce, and Steve's already one of the biggest
obsessos on CSMA. Steve is invited to check out my proof.
Why did you add those other newsgroups? Anxiety-panic?
Politics? Dreamweaver?
Translation: "LALALALALAAALAAALALA*ICANTHEARYOU*LALAAAAALAAA"
You know, Steve, you have become especially vicious of late.
Is it possible that you are mentally ill ...
Or is it just a big joke to you to flood this and other groups
and clog the server with endless megabytes of garbage that you
haven't even bothered to "X-No-Archive: Yes"?
Steve Carroll wrote:
> a whole bunc of trollish crap cross-posted to the world
Plonk
The posts which you claim are "forgeries" may or may not be
so. ... That you're a wingnut k00k? Bush _is_ a war criminal.
War crimes have been committed on his watch, and ultimate
responsibility for them leads to his desk.
Stop forging me, k00k.
DYOFDW. Motzarella's abuse dept. will act on solid evidence
of forgery of a valid email address on their server. ...
What lie? You /are/ busted. Fucking liar.
"Fantasies?" It's happening right before our eyes. You can't
see it because you're part of it.
Yeah, like you provided Message-IDs for all /your/ quotes.
Twit. I'm no more anonymous than you are -- you can google my
nyms and find a history dating back to 1999 -- and I know as
much about you as you do about me. Nothing, nada, zip,
bupkus. The caring is on the same level, too. All I care
about is your insane, frothy spew, and you are very obliging.
Re-read the sub-thread, carroll. I didn't mention third world
nations until *after* you skipped tracks.
Fiend! You're forging _me_, kO0k.
Please be explaining the law that has been broken.
Please be explaining why the police would pay attention to a
pantywaist whiner.
Please be explaining why any prosecutor would give a flying
fuck about your whining.
Please be explaining why you do not have the account nuked at
Motzerella, first.
I'll bet you are lying.
Oh, is a post without a body still a post?
Yay a meds lame.
Prove they're *Snit's*, and not, say, K-Man's, or mine
(neither he nor I are "Snit", who is being voted on for a
kook award right now, until tomorrow night). Wild, bug-eyed,
foaming accusations, aimed at some guy who handed you your
head in a political flamewar about five years ago, are
nothing.
No, I won't have sex with you, mister.
> I get it... you're measuring success in dollars and sense.
Your problem is you never use /either/ measure to rate your
success.
Wanna try a new lie, Steve?
Oh, still awaiting you to provide one piece of evidence that
I am ANYONEs sock puppet.
If I told you where to find one post under my name that
exists in google from 1995 would you admit you are wrong?
>> Steve blames me when the weather is bad.
> Whose fault is this?
Apparently, Snit's, according to you. A less-biased point of
view might well see it as a matter of your own obsession
blinding you -- or perhaps it's because you're a wingnut. I
dunno.
It appears that you're ignoring the constraint "and email".
Aratzio has published sufficient evidence to support his
claim, which you conveniently snecked.
I don't really give a flying fuck if a bunch of other people
hate Snit, for whatever reason, or blame him for bad weather,
or think he's forging you -- a million people sharing a
hallucination are a million delusional people. There is no
proof whatsoever that the Motzarella copies of your posts
came from Snit, unless the Motz admin has it himself. Your
own paranoia about Snit -- similar to BushCo paranoia about
"terrorism" -- is proof of nothing.
Classical "Commies hiding under my bed to STEAL MY KIDNEYS!"
paranoid histrionics.
No, he was merely unclear. As kooks go, Snit seems a minor
one, to me, but you seem to be more of a Gerald C. Newton.
Maybe a Lysaght, but that'd be a pretty huge diff -- you
might wind up with an award named for you, in a few years, if
so. Mind you, Emmett Earl Gulley did, and he only won 13 (but
he's in prison now for his usenet-to-real-life kookery).
These people are known technically as net.kooks. You know,
guys like Steve Carroll.
Snit may be a k00k; Steve Carroll is unquestionably a k00k
Or the guys (and gals) that Steve Carrol's paranoid delusions
think are snit.
--
"For example, user interfaces are _usually_ better in commercial software.
I'm not saying that this is always true, but in many cases the user
interface to a program is the most important part for a commercial
company..." Linus Torvalds <http://www.tlug.jp/docs/linus.html>
Steve Carroll
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Correct me where I misunderstand you, Steve.
LOL! Snit, Snit Snit... when will you learn that it makes no sense to compare
many unattributed multiple quotes from a few trolls in usenet kook groups (many
of whom use sock puppets like you do... for all anyone knows, most or all of
them are your puppets) is the same as single quotes from many different
posters... all which contain attribution.
I keep telling you... people just aren't as stupid as you need them to be;)
-- Things a few people have said about Snit --
1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to you,
and a bot will send an e-mail.
*That* is the e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes he's that
fucked in the head and starved for attention that he'd claim it to be an
e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get sucked into his little
circus.
The e-mail, in this particular instance, did probably originate from
Sandman.net."
2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd leave
too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is Edwin, I
have never made the same wish of him."
3- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup."
4- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to weasel
out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole."
5- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you are?
You could show your enemies up by being better than then, rise above the
low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just stop...."
6- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes, then
troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to expire, but
it's fixed now."
7- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do
the same.."
8- Bob S: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group, but
since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a decent
discussion about anything.
The solution is to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people
just can't stop feeding him."
9- ?b? unny: "snit makes me sad."
10- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill..."
11- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him "shit", and rightly so, for they
way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus depot, and
simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes.
It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..."
12- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
Usenet browser has a kill-filter."
13- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to "win"
an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must you keep
this up? What results are you expecting?"
14- Dawg Tail: "You've already apologized for having already misread
what I had previously written. What makes you think that you're
correctly understanding what I'm writting now. You've got a history of
reading into things what you wanted people to have said instead of what
they really said.
I suggest you get over this limitation of yours. It's making you look
foolish."
Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost all of
them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so many diverse
people who share a common perception where do you think the problem
lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an
advanced degree to figure out."
15- Dave Fritzinger: "Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do
something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!! "
16- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was presented
to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you."
17- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for the
magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double
condolences to her). "
18- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought it
would make people look at you."
19- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see a
doctor."
20- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points in
my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode. How
childishly typical of you, Snit. "
21- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you. I
hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle
of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs and
more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end then all
this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has always
been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up to the
point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA
and making this place your own personal
circus."
22- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
(AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you crazy
with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right at any
cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you into
submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage him is
to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that
will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!"
23- gimme_this_gimme_t...@yahoo.com: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
24- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
notices that you are not honest and you have no honor."
25- Henry Flam: "Who gives a damn about this shit? Snit, once in a
while, I make the mistake in thinking that that you are starting to make
sense in your posts; I tend to agree with your politics. Then you post
stuff like this and it destroys any respect that I have for you."
26- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"
27- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have some
insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and avoid
answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was just
repeated. "
28- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over. Either
you're a super troll, or you're a super mess."
29- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."
30- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
31- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me achieve
a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from it and
those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as this."
32- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
besides being annoying? Is that your goal?"
33- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
threads."
34- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved in
seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to OT
things and garbage?"
35- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I suppose."
36- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall -
in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'"
37- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are you
bitching about?"
38- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like a
black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain an
unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up? Please??"
39- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his name."
40- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked that
he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a computer
repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best ignored. Let him
deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do one thing, get
attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what he's
counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes to get a rise
out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't regret it."
John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding
drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of my
killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK."
41- Josh McKee: "Snit, I assume there was some point to this posting?
Because I certainly cannot find it."
42- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot is
mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers that
keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all this
place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll pack up
and take his trolling to more fertile ground."
43- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother reading
the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of putrid
excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your position,
instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming, hoping it'll
all go away."
44- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad hominem
attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem attacks.You
make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your silliness. You're a
liar and a hypocrite and you always have been."
45- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid."
46- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time, but
the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth it
anymore. *plonk*"
47- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense of
trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is trashtalk
about Linux and you acting every bit the troll."
48- Linonut (cola): "Snit is a Tholenoid."
"Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief".
49- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most cretinous,
I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"
50- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very keen
on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story.
Mr Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to
help him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if
he's ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has."
51- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to this
post since its all about him and he managed to make me think about him
today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her house and
videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then burned a DVD
of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got
mad because we quit making him the center of attention and made that kid
on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life."
52- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes your
"facts", you run away and ignore them. Refuting your "facts" is easily
done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it. "
53- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see you
doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone.
You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!"
54- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I can
only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens to
inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how deranged
you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please seek
professional help."
55- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious. Treat
him the same way, look but just keep moving on."
56- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
show that you are crying out for attention."
57- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your
obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him.
Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet
you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their
e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual."
58- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
about social behavior."
59- Muahman: "Ummm, dude you post 1000 posts a day. 999 of them are
trolls, if anyone here has issues it's not me."
60- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced that
snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I certainly am
now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?"
61- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."
62- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
children in the back seat of the family car saying:
Mom, 'snits' touching me ...
and you responding much as you do now ...
I'm not touching you, you're touching me!
The problem is that by now you should've grown out of that type of poke
and complain interaction with others. But, of course, you've haven't
learned how to interact with others in a more 'constructive' and
mutually beneficial manner even now."
63- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I killfiled
him?"
64- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and desire
to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of things."
65- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:
Select offending Author, example Snit...
Go to the Filters Menu, Choose "Kill this Author"
Click "OK"
Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your choice.
Then to see your work...
Choose the Filter Menu again,
Then "Refilter Articles"...
Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about nothing.
Enjoy!!!!!"
66- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?"
67- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "
68- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear to
be the least honest and honorable of anyone here."
69- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in Newswatcher
but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with Snit. Ten
seconds later and he's gone! Amazing."
70- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
argument with sandman into the private room."
71- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and someti...
err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he has something
useful to say."
72- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."
73- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot is a hideous troll. Nobody is as
dishonest as that piece of unadultered garbage. There are csma posters
even more stupid than Snot. Oxford comes to mind. There are certainly
other csma posters who lie nearly as much. But no others are so intent
on trolling in whatever way possible as Snot"
74- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get superficial
snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."
75- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their
acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad
infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing
pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your primary
purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll."
76- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."
77- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You trash
people that are trying their level best to cope with a horrendous
situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what is going
on."
78- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a troll.
I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a troll, he is
... somewhat clumsy."
79- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you quote
Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the shell
of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk of
looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If that's
your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you."
80- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group?
As the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your
posts seem to confirm that saying IMHO."
81- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY- of
csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news group
before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against him in
just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the funny part
with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider himself be a
troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him. Obviously they are
wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this behaviour."
82- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly, even
the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more sense than
this. You been doing drugs or something?"
83- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
remove smut from your harddrive."
84- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing anger,
i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he thinks
he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's pretty
smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and the iq
tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well adjusted."
85- Steve Carroll: "The only things we are sure about Snit is that he
has:
* a monumental reading comprehension problem.
* nym-shifted numerous times to avoid kill-files.
* built too many straw-men to count... some, the size of small cities.
* been labeled a disingenuous liar/troll(or worse) by the vast majority.
* used numerous sock-puppets and admitted to it.
* stolen IDs and admitted to it.
* gotten booted off by ISPs for his behavior.
* twisted more context than all csma posters combined.
* made more unsupported accusations than all csma posters combined.
* virtually no life outside of csma."
86- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of elephant
dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the "Snit Circus",
but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun to smell like
elephant dung."
87- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
for your rediculous argument regarding this."
88- Steve Travis: "Oh oh... Now look what we've done. Snit has lost all
self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses' when
referring to others. Oh, how could the morally superior snit have fallen
so low.. Please take a moment out of your busy schedule to feel
embarassed for him. Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get him more
happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)."
89- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him then. A
snit is a snit is a snit and always will be."
90- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls that
inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than you
are. "
91-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see, you
never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why just the
other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of liars (in this
NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar."
92- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more compassion.
Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor sick fool can
get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out with and
supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that no-one
likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or don't
know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
one of them"
93- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you could
actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here."
94- Timberwoof: "*Plonk!*"
95- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one of
your Circus acts?"
96- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have succeeded!
That also goes for all that bullshit on your website"
97- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit. Most
people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict their
responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'.
Just what would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity?
Must be some kind of severe mental illness."
98- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game."
99- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my sincere
apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the first
person to be plonked from my new computer! :-) "
100- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"
101- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping Snit
to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his tawdry
little life."
102- Znu: "I think your 'I'll go start a new thread to try to draw more
people into the debate I'm currently having with Steve/Elizabot/etc'
tactic is fairly trollish."
103 - High Plains Thumper: "Well, for one who is trolling this
group, those were extremely poorly done examples, making problems
that do not exist except an invention of Snit's own mind."
104 - Geoff M. Fitton:
"The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing how stupid he is...
What a mar00n".
105 - William Poaster:
"Good grief. If anyone's having a mental breakdown it's the Prescott
Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a f#cked up mess he is'.
106 - Tattoo Vampire:
"In other words, in another attempt to troll, you made yourself look like a
fool. Again".
107 -Mr. Blonde
"Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that your obsession with
Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF him. Killfilling
someone generally implies you're ignoring that person, yet you
piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and and check his
website's validation status more often than most people check their
e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced individual".
108 - CozmicDebris
"I'm done with your three year old games. The archives show my answers and your
inability to process them. Keep posting your list and proving that you are an
idiot troll. I will not address it any further- you being too stupid to realize
and accept that is not my problem".
109 - WhoMe
"F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more than he's anywhere near a
classroom".
110 - spi...@freenet.co.uk
"The thought is probably to show everyone here just how bad a troll snit is".
111- Carlo Coggi
"He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in the groups he trolls
in, that is.
I wondered if the idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of
course, I didn't see his posts, only your reply".
112 - bobinv
"I learned some time ago how much better this group can be if you kill file
Snit. I have never understood why more people don't do the same".
113 - Zaren Ankleweed
"And with that, Snit goes in the global killfile. No subject, no author,
no nothing. Buh-bye".
114 - H
"Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads, are you doing this
on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor people cause that's just
retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your
name 40 times in a row. So uh, change your client or something".
115 - PeterBP
"Oh will you stfu".
--
--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air] is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty much
just throw it away". - Snit
Steve Carroll
Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> Correct me
The hypocrite named Snit wrote to Sandman:
"I am saying quote scavenging "contests" are silly. Here: I grant that you
are a better quote scavenger than I am - or at least than I care to be. You
win... I shall not even enter the contest: let us both acknowledge that you
can (and are willing to) dredge up more disparaging quotes than I am.
OK, now that your quote scavenging BS is handled, are you willing to
actually get back to the topic of *behavior* and not of side issues such as
quote scavenging?"
Funny stuff;)