Thomas E. wrote:
> -hh wrote:
> > Tom wrote:
> > > I enjoy a variety of activities. Prefer nice places,
> > > and the tent had a power cord ...
> >
> > My point as that you talked down to the choices of others
> > (which have been more than an air mattress in a tent with
> > an extension cord)
[re-arranged for context]
> My apologies. I was not "talking down" more adventurous travel.
> I was actually putting myself down for being such a wimp. :)
No problem then: just an example of the medium's limitations.
> > > As for travel, the first trip was 1976 ..
> >
> > Did [not] ask about the first international, but for recent.
> > ...
> > Since 2000, the list show personal international trips taken
> > total to seven; business is about double that over the past
> > decade, although a bit looks to be mostly Canada or Central/
> > /South America...not the places you name-dropped before.
> > ...
> > With three of those seven being of but four (4) day duration,
> > and none double digits, it's not likely that there's many (if
> > any) other countries. Especially if ...
[re-arranged again]
Actually, this helps quite a bit, as I see that I was using the
wrong data column for my comment above about personal trip durations:
I had used your "Air Legs", not "OUS" (Out of USA). As such, the
average trip duration discussion pulled from the wrong data:
instead of being under a week, its a bit over...although the data
does appear a bit odd in that it is highly bimodal between being
either "two+ week" or "weekend" in duration. Didn't look like
these short ones were as a personal extension off of a business-
paid ticket either, although that is a possibility.
> The list was originally created to track business travel only.
> I did not log any personal travel in this list until about 2000.
> Since I don't have the records I did not attempt to add them
> back in. There were one or two vacation trips to Europe before 2000.
> Also, in some cases family was on the business trips, so those
> are a bit of both.
A legacy source of data has its own reasons to exist (hence,
limitations for reuse). I have similar lists, one of which was
prompted by a class action lawsuit claim on foreign credit card
transaction fees which motivated finding/documenting trips from
the 1996-2006 timeframe for the claim. I've generally not
bothered with much recordkeeping on business trips unless there
were tax implications, and since these get filed annually, a
consolidated multi-year list isn't particularly value added.
> > BTW...Auckland is a nice city; I'll try to see about
> > what decent food recommendations I might have from there.
>
> We are flying from Auckland to Christchurch the day
> after arrival, and back to Auckland the day before departure.
> That is not booked yet, and not included. Anyway, it's a
> domestic trip.
I've not bothered to count travel legs at all; merely just
another example of how counts can be done differently for
different reasons/interests.
> Yes, it has slowed down since retirement, and more focused
> on vacation time. As it should be.
Agreed, although even so, I would have expected that you
would have had a lot more personal international over the
past decade based on how you had spoken of it...particularly
since there's also the "do the hard trips before you're too
old for them" aspect; our general rule of thumb is to look
to arrange to do a big/hard one every 2-3 years...
> ...There was this one trip to Brussels to spend an hour
> with a EU bureaucrat, then back home. That was a killer.
I'll let you revisit that comment after you complete your
flights to NZ ;-)
BTW, if you're not looking at Business Class, Air New Zealand
came out with their 'Skycouch' shortly after we went there;
aka "cuddle class" ...
http://www.airnewzealand.com/economy-skycouch
... but it appears that reception has been mixed;
Caveat Emptor.
-hh