Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

News at 11: Michael Glasser lying again

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 1:06:13 PM8/29/08
to
The liar Michael Glasser (Snot/Snit/Rekruled) snotted:

> "Tattoo Vampire" <sit...@this.computer> stated in post
> g1l9n5pmdog4$.dlg@this.domain.or.that on 8/27/08 1:22 PM:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire freaks out over my having made a type (I typed 28 when I
>>> meant 26), while openly lying about me having called him and spewing BS
>>> about my personal and business life. He also repeatedly snips context
>>> and changes the topic to avoid talking about his proved lies.
>>
>> OK, Michael.
>
> I am glad you agree.
>
>> Here's your chance to show yourself to be an honest member of
>> COLA.
>
> I already have. You have not.
>
>> You laughed about my pic showing an "old" calendar on the wall. I told
>> you it was an old photo. You said I was a liar and that the EXIF tags
>> proved it was a recent one.
>
> Yup... and then you caught me making a typo... I said the data in the file
> indicated "28" and you corrected me and stated it was "26". I made a
> goof.
> Yup. You caught me red handed making a typo.
>
> Man... I am just humiliated over that one... I made a typo. I will never
> live that down.
>
> LOL!

Message-ID: <4mifhhv9i9yp$.dlg@this.domain.or.that>

He said nothing of that sort. He said "How could it be taken on August 28th
when today is only the 26th?"
Notice that he does not mention any creation date or EXIF data, lying fool
Glasser?
 
You then answered:
Message-ID: <C4D9E768.D27C4%use...@gallopinginsanity.com>
--------------
Hmmm, darn good question... and my typo.. it was taken today, on the 26th.
--------------


And he again corrected you:
Message-ID: <17jo33ik...@this.domain.or.that>
--------------
Wrong yet again, idiot. It was taken last month, after I moved into that
office. Last month was July, hence a July magazine schedule on the wall.
Follow that, Prescott Computer Guy?
--------------

Care to misrepresent the thread some more, Liar Glasser?

>
>> NOW - lets' see your proof. Post a screenshot showing said data, or admit
>> you were just trying to troll me.
>>
>> I *know* that you can't, because that image has no EXIF tags embedded.
>
> You mean the data you told me I was wrong about? LOL!
>
> Gee, get any more random calls you want to blame on me? Did you even get
> the first?
>
> Let us remember what your whole freak out is about: you do not like my
> well
> supported views on desktop Linux issues. *Nothing* more.
>

Poor liar Michael Glasser. You got caught outright lying *again*, and now
you want to move the goalposts and the topic to somewhat "friendlier" (for
you) pastures

Will not work, though. Expect to answer the question for the EXIF data for
the next 25 years, each day

--
"Against stupidity, the very gods themselves contend in vain."
Friedrich Schiller

Steve de Mena

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 1:11:13 PM8/29/08
to
Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.

Steve

Peter Köhlmann

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 1:21:08 PM8/29/08
to
Steve de Mena wrote:

> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.
>
> Steve

Do you actually think anyone in COLA cares for that Mac user Michael
Glasser, the most dishonest twit ever?
--
Don't abandon hope: your Tom Mix decoder ring arrives tomorrow

Snit

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 3:57:36 PM8/29/08
to
"Steve de Mena" <st...@stevedemena.com> stated in post
Cs-dnQgKU5gssCXV...@giganews.com on 8/29/08 10:11 AM:

> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.

Nor do I. Peter Köhlmann just keeps harping on a freaking *typo* I made...
a typo I acknowledged I made as soon as it was pointed out. And then he
insists on cross-posting the BS to other groups...

I noted the date listed in the EXIF data of an image - I wrote 28 when I
should have written 26. Peter could not find the EXIF data and then started
lying about multiple images with EXIF data (or no EXIF data - I am not sure
he ever decided what he meant).

Over a *typo* I made and acknowledged Peter Köhlmann has spewed his BS into
CSMA, has belittled my family, lied about my personal life (well,

So Peter, take your garbage to your *own* email... leave it out of CSMA, out
of COLA, and if you clutter my email I will simply create a rule to have
your BS deleted.

This debate is over.

--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.

Tattoo Vampire

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 5:42:23 PM8/29/08
to
Steve de Mena wrote:

> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.

Killfiles can set you free, champ.
--
Regards,
[tv]

...I'm just here for moral support... please ignore the gun.

Owner/Proprietor, Cheesus Crust Pizza Company
Good to the last supper

Snit

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 7:26:36 PM8/29/08
to
"Steve de Mena" <st...@stevedemena.com> stated in post
Cs-dnQgKU5gssCXV...@giganews.com on 8/29/08 10:11 AM:

> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.

Nor do I. Peter Köhlmann just keeps harping on a freaking *typo* I made...

Snit

unread,
Aug 29, 2008, 9:11:16 PM8/29/08
to
"Steve de Mena" <st...@stevedemena.com> stated in post
Cs-dnQgKU5gssCXV...@giganews.com on 8/29/08 10:11 AM:

> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.

Nor do I. Peter Köhlmann just keeps harping on a freaking *typo* I made...

Linonut

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 9:38:59 AM8/30/08
to
* Tattoo Vampire peremptorily fired off this memo:

> Steve de Mena wrote:
>
>> Why don't you take this to private email. No one in these groups cares.
>
> Killfiles can set you free, champ.

Indeed. Snit may be the first retraction of my general killfile
amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
effete candy-ass beggars belief.

If I hear about his breakfast choices again, I'm going to lose my lunch.

--
What they say: What they mean:
A major technological breakthrough... Back to the drawing board.
Developed after years of research Discovered by pure accident.
Designs are within allowable limits We made it, stretching a point or two.
We are looking forward to Windows 7 Vista sucks rat bags

0 new messages