Just look at the effort F. Russell once again had to spend to get Onion
Knight able to pull messages from a message server via reverse engineering.
F. Russell once again, took mistreatment from Onion Knight, instead of
a great thanks, sign of indebtedness, response - that I feel F. Russell
was owed for the trouble and time he spent on the explaination. I am well
aware the channel I link to from F. Russell is merely dabbler level. That
said, it meets the requirements.
http://web.archive.org/web/20210414021502if_/https://ibb.co/vQ4M1sX
Generally, F. Russell would not call a comment like Onion Knight's claims
a fantasy right up until you invalidate it and Onion Knight responds with
the shifting of goal posts ignoring what you said. Anyway, it won't matter
because the name on a post is irrelevant, it's the content that counts.
The content clearly is a bunch of rambling Onion Knight-like crap. 2+2=
Onion Knight claimed the text mining were entirely consistent with many
of the socks. Well, why is he having such a struggle backing his statement
up when asked to do so? That is, if his statement was even mostly correct,
and not just a dishonest attempt to come to F. Russells rescue?
--
Top Ten Ways Onion Knight Trolls
https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-glasser-86860011
Narcissistic Bigot Steve Carroll