Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dual Celeron ???

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jochen Kronsteiner

unread,
Nov 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/5/99
to
How good does a computer system with DUAL Celeron work ??
Please help me !!

Jochen


a

unread,
Nov 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/7/99
to
its a little suggestive really.

You haven't even said how fast the dual celerons are ;-)

Lots of memory is the big thing.

And you need an operating system that supports dual CPU's

W98 will run on a dual cpu system, but it only uses one cpu,
linux and wnt/windows2000 both support multi processors
(I think that nt on supports two cpus, but I may be wrong).

cheers ant

Jochen Kronsteiner wrote in message <38232A89...@vpn.at>...

Arthur Wong

unread,
Nov 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/8/99
to
Almost as good as a dual P-III system (on my Abit BP6).
However, it will work on Windows NT, Linux or other O/S support
multi-processing only.
In general, you will experience 50% to 70% increase in performance.

regards,

Arthur

Jochen Kronsteiner <jkrons...@vpn.at> wrote in message
news:38232A89...@vpn.at...

John Douglass

unread,
Nov 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/8/99
to
Just like a dual PII or PIII - you have to run an operating system like
NT or Linux that utilizes the second processor. The best board is Abit's
BP6. Get it with dual Celeron 366 Mhz PPGA chips. Generally you can
overclock it to 500 Mhz!

John

Terry

unread,
Nov 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/8/99
to
In article <uS5V3.2821$vO2....@ozemail.com.au>, a.@.com says...

> its a little suggestive really.
>
Standard NT Workstation supports dual processors, and Server supports 4.
But you can buy server versions (that's for 4.0 not 2000 too by the way)
for anything up to 32 processors.

Terry


> You haven't even said how fast the dual celerons are ;-)
>
> Lots of memory is the big thing.
>
> And you need an operating system that supports dual CPU's
>
> W98 will run on a dual cpu system, but it only uses one cpu,
> linux and wnt/windows2000 both support multi processors
> (I think that nt on supports two cpus, but I may be wrong).
>
> cheers ant
>
>
>
> Jochen Kronsteiner wrote in message <38232A89...@vpn.at>...

Peter Chen

unread,
Nov 8, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/8/99
to
The Server version supports up to 4 procs
The retail Server Enterprise Edition supports up to 8 procs
and the OEM Server Enterprise Edition supports up to 32 procs


Terry <ter...@NOSPAMozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:MPG.12916bb1...@news.ozemail.com.au...

Telcontar

unread,
Nov 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/10/99
to
2K is meant to kill NT sales...

It is NT5 after all...

2K supports dual procs Professional supports 2, server I think 2-4 ,
with advanced server 4-8.

Of interest:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/professional/
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/server/

bill davidsen wrote:
>
>
> NT supports two CPUs, do you have anything official which says Win2k
> does as well? That would seem to kill NT sales.

bill davidsen

unread,
Nov 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/11/99
to
In article <uS5V3.2821$vO2....@ozemail.com.au>, a <a.@.com> wrote:

| W98 will run on a dual cpu system, but it only uses one cpu,
| linux and wnt/windows2000 both support multi processors

NT supports two CPUs, do you have anything official which says Win2k


does as well? That would seem to kill NT sales.

--
bill davidsen <davi...@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
When taking small children to a carnival, always have them go potty
*before* you let them go on the rides, and let them eat all the junk
food and candy *after*.

bill davidsen

unread,
Nov 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/11/99
to
In article <3826B63F...@iamdigex.net>,

John Douglass <doug...@iamdigex.net> wrote:
| Just like a dual PII or PIII - you have to run an operating system like
| NT or Linux that utilizes the second processor. The best board is Abit's
| BP6. Get it with dual Celeron 366 Mhz PPGA chips. Generally you can
| overclock it to 500 Mhz!

I have a couple of dual Cel-400 systems, both run rock solid at 500MHz
at 2.0v and 540MHz at 2.2v. The 400's were way cheaper than the slower
chips (no, I don't know why), so I went that way and used PC100 memory.

How it compares with a dual P-III depends on how the application hit
cache, but price-performance favors the dual Celeron.

0 new messages